The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 61 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods
Open accessAbstract
Dietary restraint theoretically increases risk for binge eating, but prospective and experimental studies have produced contradictory findings, apparently because dietary restraint scales do not identify individuals who are reducing caloric intake. Yet, experimentally manipulated caloric deprivation increases responsivity of brain regions implicated in attention and reward to food images, which may contribute to binge eating. We tested whether self-imposed acute and longer-term caloric restriction increases responsivity of attention and reward regions to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food using functional magnetic resonance imaging among female and male adolescents (Study 1 n=34; Study 2 n=51/81). Duration of acute caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation in response to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen, and precentral gyrus respectively). Youth in a longer-term negative energy balance likewise showed greater activation in attention (anterior cingulate cortex, ventral medial prefrontal cortex), visual processing (superior visual cortex), reward (caudate) and memory (hippocampus) regions in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food relative to those in neutral or positive energy balance. Results confirm that self-imposed caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention, reward, and motivation regions to food, which may explain why caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In two fMRI studies of adolescents, longer self-imposed caloric deprivation and a 2-week negative energy balance were associated with greater responsivity of attention, reward, and motivation brain regions to palatable food images, anticipated milkshake receipt, and milkshake receipt. The authors argue this may help explain why caloric-deprivation weight-loss diets often do not produce lasting weight loss.
Key findings
- Study 1 (N = 34 female adolescents; mean deprivation 7.8 ± 4.6 hours, range 1–16): duration of caloric deprivation correlated positively with left OFC activation for appetizing > unappetizing food pictures and right precentral gyrus activation for appetizing > water pictures; no significant effects emerged for reverse contrasts or quadratic relations.
- Study 2 acute deprivation (n = 51; mean 6.9 ± 3.7 hours, range 3–22.5): hours since last caloric intake correlated positively with activation during milkshake cue > tasteless cue in regions including MTG, precentral gyrus, medial SFG, lingual gyrus, dlPFC, dorsal ACC, MFG, IOG, vlPFC, parahippocampal gyrus, putamen, cerebellum, thalamus, and MOG; for milkshake receipt > tasteless receipt, it correlated positively with left mid insula.
- Study 2 longer-term energy balance: the negative energy balance group (≥1 kg loss; n = 27; mean −1.5 ± 0.5 kg) showed greater activation than the positive energy balance group (n = 23; mean +1.7 ± 0.9 kg) in left precuneus, left mPFC, and right ventral ACC for anticipated receipt, and in left caudate and right precentral gyrus for receipt; versus the energy stable group (n = 31; mean −0.01 ± 0.08 kg), it showed greater activation in left cuneus, left dlPFC, and left PCC for anticipated receipt, and bilateral caudate, right hippocampus, left MOG, and left fusiform gyrus for receipt.
- Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation in Study 1 (p = 0.98; r = 0.004) or Study 2 (p = 0.46; r = 0.10), and did not differ across energy balance groups (p = 0.92).
Methods
- Two fMRI studies in adolescents. Study 1 included 34 healthy female adolescents (M age = 15.5 ± 0.9, BMI = 24.6 ± 5.6). Study 2 included 162 adolescent males and females (M age = 15.3 ± 1.07, BMI = 20.8 ± 1.90), but analyses used 51 participants with data on pre-scan caloric deprivation and 81 participants meeting weight-change criteria.
- Study 1 used a food-picture paradigm: participants rated 103 food pictures, then viewed their 40 most appetizing, 40 least appetizing, and 40 water pictures; contrasts were appetizing > unappetizing and appetizing > water, regressed on hours since last dietary intake.
- Study 2 used a milkshake receipt/anticipation paradigm with chocolate milkshake versus calorie-free tasteless solution; contrasts were milkshake receipt > tasteless receipt and milkshake cue > tasteless cue, regressed on hours since last caloric intake and compared across negative, stable, and positive energy balance groups based on 2-week weight change (lost ≥1 kg, remained within 0.1 kg, gained ≥1 kg). Imaging used SPM8 with whole-brain cluster-level correction (p < 0.001, k ≥ 11, corrected p < 0.05).
Limitations
- The paper states: there was no way to confirm that the negative energy balance group consumed fewer calories than needed on the actual scan day; only one palatable food was tested and it was a beverage, so generalization to solid foods is cautious; participants were adolescents, so results may not generalize to adults; and sample sizes, though larger than many imaging studies, were still moderate and may have limited power and generalizability.
- Evident from the text: the acute-deprivation analyses in Study 2 used only 51 of 162 participants because deprivation data were not collected for all; Study 1 included only females while Study 2 included both sexes; and the acute-deprivation findings are correlational, based on self-reported hours since last intake rather than experimentally manipulated deprivation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 61 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Youth in a longer-term negative energy balance likewise showed greater activation in attention (anterior cingulate cortex, ventral medial prefrontal cortex), visual processing (superior visual cortex), reward (caudate) and memory (hippocampus) regions in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food relative to those in neutral or positive energy balance.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Duration of acute caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation in response to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen, and precentral gyrus respectively).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the appetizing food > unappetizing food contrast, duration of caloric deprivation was positively related to activity in the left OFC (Figure 1A).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no evidence of significant quadratic relations between hours of caloric deprivation and neural activation in response to images of appetizing foods.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 34Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the appetizing food > water contrast, duration of caloric deprivation was positively related to activity in the right precentral gyrus (Figure 1B).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no significant effects when examining the unappetizing > appetizing food or water > appetizing food contrasts.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 34Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participant’s Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation (P = 0.98; r = 0.004)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 34Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants in a negative energy balance state during the scan in Study 2 compared to those in a positive or stable energy balance showed greater activation in the precuneus, mPFC, ventral ACC, cuneus, dlPFC, and PCC in response to anticipated receipt of milkshake.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The positive energy balance group did not show significantly greater activation in response to the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast compared to either energy stable or negative energy balance groups.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No significant effects emerged for the reverse contrasts.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 51Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On 1-20 point scales, participants rated the chocolate milkshake as highly pleasant (M = 14.2) and edible (M = 15.8) immediately before the scan.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 51Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants (N = 34) reported a mean deprivation of 7.8 ± 4.6 hours (range 1 to 16).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 34Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Again, participant’s Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation (P = 0.46, r = 0.10).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 51Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast, hours of caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in the right hemisphere in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG), precentral gyrus, medial superior frontal gyrus (medial SFG), lingual gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, Figure 1C), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dorsal ACC), and middle frontal gyrus (MFG)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants (n = 51) reported a mean deprivation of 6.9 ± 3.7 hours (range 3 to 22.5).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 51Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those in the positive energy balance group (≥ 1kg in weight gain; n = 23) showed a mean weight gain of 1.7 ± 0.9kg (range 1.1 - 5.6kg) over the 2-week period.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 23Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast, participants in the negative energy balance group showed greater activation in the left precuneus, left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and right ventral ACC relative to the positive energy balance group and greater activation in the left cuneus, left dlPFC, and left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) relative to the energy stable group (Table”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants in the energy stable group (remained within 0.1kg, n = 31) showed a trivial increase in mean weight (−0.01 ± 0.08kg; range −0.1 - 0.1kg).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 31Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hours since last caloric intake and negative energy balance status showed no correlation with scores on the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dietary restraint theoretically increases risk for binge eating”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“Theorists posit that dietary restraint increases risk for onset and maintenance of binge eating and bulimia nervosa (Fairburn, 1997; Polivy & Herman, 1985).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fairburn, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Polivy & Herman, 1985 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“prospective and experimental studies have produced contradictory findings”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“increases in bulimic symptoms (Johnson & Wardle, 2005; Stice, 2001; Wertheim, Koerner, & Paxton, 2001).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson & Wardle, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Stice, 2001 source
- Not checked yetcites Wertheim, Koerner, & Paxton, 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“some individuals may engage in true caloric restriction, which does increase risk for binge eating (Stice et al., 2010).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stice et al., 2010 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, randomized trials find that assignment to energy-deficit weight loss interventions versus waitlist control conditions results in significant decreases in binge eating for healthy young adults”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Groesz & Stice, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Presnell & Stice, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Goodrick, Poston, Kimball, Reeves & Foreyt, 1998
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because we used larger samples (N = 34, 51, & 81) than employed in past studies (N = 10 to 20), we were able to conduct whole-brain analyses, rather than region of interest analyses, which should provide a more comprehensive and reliable index of the effect of elective dietary restriction in neural response to food.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants who moved greater 2mm or 2° in any direction were excluded from analyses.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“rats randomized to extreme caloric deprivation conditions (in which they lost 7% - 20% of their body mass) eat significantly more calories during ad lib feeding and show a preference for high-fat foods immediately after the deprivation period relative to non-deprived rats”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagan, Chandler, Wauford, Rybak, & Oswald, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Lucas & Sclafani, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Ogawa et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another gap in the literature is that few studies have investigated the effects of elective longer-term caloric deprivation; the fMRI experiments described above only investigated the effects of acute caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects remained when potential outliers were excluded for these and subsequently reported effects.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 34Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Because findings did not change when this covariate was included, results from analyses that did not include this covariate are reported.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dreher et al., 2007 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“potentially because of the small samples used in these studies (Ns = 10 to 20).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“though null effects also emerged (Siep et al., 2009; Uher et al., 2006)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“humans randomized to periods of caloric deprivation work longer on operant tasks to earn high-calorie snack foods and eat more snack foods than non-deprived controls”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cameron, Goldfield, Cyr, & Doucet, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Epstein et al., 2003 source
- Not checked yetcites Raynor & Epstein, 2003
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resulting threshold of p < 0.001 with a cluster (k) ≥ 11 was considered corrected for multiple comparisions across the whole brain.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This scale has shown internal consistency (α’s range from .93 to .95) and temporal reliability (2-week test-retest r = .82; Stice, et al., 2004; van Strien et al., 1986).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.3 Dutch Restrained Eating Scale
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random effects analyses were used to account for both within-group and within-subject variance.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Prospective acquisition correction (PACE) was applied to adjust slice position and orientation, as well as to re-grid residual volume-to-volume motion in real-time during data acquisition for the purpose of reducing motion-induced effects in Study 2 (Thesen et al., 2000).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thesen et al., 2000 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, data suggest that true caloric restriction may increase the reward value of food, such that the longer the caloric deprivation, the greater the activation of attention and reward regions in response to food, which putatively increases the likelihood of food intake.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A cluster level threshold of p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain for each study were derived using Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) of random noise distribution in the whole brain mask (3×3×3mm) using the 3dClustSim in AFNI (Cox, 1996; Forman et al., 1995).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fMRI experiments in which participants were randomly assigned to a period of caloric deprivation or a non-deprivation condition have strong internal validity, but limited external validity because participants did not voluntarily elect to engage in caloric restriction, as occurs in real-world dieters.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In response to pictures of palatable foods, individuals who had successfully recovered from obesity showed greater activation in a region associated with inhibitory control (the superior frontal region) than obese and normal weight individuals, greater activation in a region involved in visual attention (middle temporal region) than normal weight individuals, and less activation in a motor”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McCaffery et al., 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although this scale correlates with self-reported caloric intake, like all dietary restraint or dieting scales, it does not correlate with objectively measured caloric intake (e.g., Ouwens et al., 2003; Stice, et al., 2004).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.3 Dutch Restrained Eating Scale
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Experimental research with rats has revealed that acute food deprivation and chronic caloric deprivation results in increased DA release at feeding and increased D2 receptor binding (Thanos et al., 2008)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thanos et al., 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interesting, animal experiments show that caloric deprivation selectively increases preferences for high-fat foods (Lucas & Sclafani, 1992).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lucas & Sclafani, 1992
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the findings from Study 1 and Study 2 suggest that duration of acute calorie deprivation is related to greater reward valuation of and attention to palatable food pictures and food cues and potentially with greater motivation to obtain or consume the food.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Abstinence from cocaine after a period of regular use resulted in a 17% increase in cells that selectively fire in response to cocaine directed behavior”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cameron & Carelli, 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, results imply that caloric deprivation increases responsivity to real food much more than it does to images of food, probably because pictures of food hold no caloric value for hungry people.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data collectively suggest that caloric deprivation increases D2R receptor sensitization, which could explain the greater reward value of food after caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Mechanisms of caloric deprivation observed in rats generalize to humans.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we investigated neural response to receipt and anticipated receipt of only one palatable food and it was a beverage.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and elevated D2Rs showed enhanced effector striatal coupling (Carr et al., 2003).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carr et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results should be generalized with caution to other palatable foods, particularly solid foods.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, although the samples used in these studies are larger than those typically used in brain imaging studies, they were still only moderate in magnitude, which may have limited our statistical power and the generalizability of our findings.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, because participants in these two studies were adolescents, results may not generalize to adults.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Administration of the D1R agonist SFK-82958 produced enhanced striatal activation”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carr et al., 2003 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most critically, findings imply that weight loss diets that involve the replacement of unhealthy energy dense foods with healthy low energy density foods should be more effective than diets that involve long periods of caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion > 4.1 Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results imply that if people attempt to lose weight by abstaining from food intake for long durations of time, it will have the effect of increasing the reward value of food, which may lead to poor food choices when the individual eventually does eat.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, although the samples used in these studies are larger than those typically used in brain imaging studies, they were still only moderate in magnitude, which may have limited our statistical power and the generalizability of our findings.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
“To assess the impact of longer-term energy balance we used weight change over the 2-week period during which the scan occurred to group participants into three a priori groups”
“This allowed us to contrast the neural response of individuals who were in an objectively measured negative energy balance to those who were in an energy stable or positive energy balance state when the scan took place.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
“participants reported the number of hours since their last dietary intake (to the nearest quarter hour)”
“duration of caloric deprivation”
The paper relies on this without support.
BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
“BOLD response was contrasted during receipt of milkshake versus tasteless solution”
“activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation”
The paper relies on this without support.
Caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.
“which may explain why caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' self-reported duration of elective acute caloric deprivation accurately reflects their actual caloric deprivation.
“participants reporting a longer duration of elective acute caloric deprivation”
“Hours since last caloric intake and negative energy balance status showed no correlation with scores on the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mechanisms of caloric deprivation observed in rats generalize to humans.
“These data collectively suggest that caloric deprivation increases D2R receptor sensitization, which could explain the greater reward value of food after caloric deprivation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The targeted-effect size was chosen based on findings from studies employing CIC paradigms for drug craving52, food cravings25,37,53,54 and internet gaming craving27, which report medium-to-large effect sizes in cue reactivity52.”
From Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A negative mean weight change is described as an increase
MinorThe energy-stable group's reported mean change of −0.01 kg is a slight decrease, not an increase.
“showed a trivial increase in mean weight”
“(−0.01 ± 0.08kg; range −0.1 - 0.1kg)”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.110 · Cited by 5,340
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,539
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,279
Stice, E. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.124 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gautier, 1999, Increased cortical representation of hunger and satiation in obese men, Diabetes, 48, A312
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–161 of 161
Weight Suppression and Risk for Childhood Psychiatric Disorders
Sim, L. A., Whiteside, S. P. H., Harbeck‐Weber, C., Sawchuk, N. R., & Lebow, J. R. (2023) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-023-01617-7 · Cited by 2
“However, more research is emerging on the relationship of weight suppression to pediatric eating disorders, defining food, as well as disrupt signals of hunger and satiety (Leidy et al. 2011; Lowe et al. 2018; Stice et al. 2013).”
Boyd, L. A. (2016) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · Cited by 2
The role of distinct food reward processing stages in restrained eating subtypes: An ERP study
Xie, X., & Chen, H. (2026) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2026.108463 · Cited by 1
Metabolic and neural responses to ultraprocessed foods: a randomized, controlled, crossover study
Hutelin, Z., Ahrens, M., Baugh, M. E., Nartey, E., Herald, D. L., Hanlon, A. L., & DiFeliceantonio, A. G. (2026) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-026-01619-4
“The lingual gyrus has been reported in studies of food cues 37 , and the visual association cortex in mice can be sensitive to reward associations 38 .”
Neurobiology and Cognitive Neuroscience of Hedonic Eating
Wilcox, C. E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83078-6_8 · Cited by 1
Stockton, M. B., Pence, J., Davis, A., & Bloomer, R. J. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.72545 · Cited by 1
Problems Related to Eating, Nutrition, and Body Image
Modica, C. A. (2018) · Principles of specialty nursing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31772-4_31 · Cited by 1
Teaching the Self-Regulation of Eating
Standen, E. C., Furman, C. R., & Mann, T. L. (2018) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628318779279 · Cited by 1
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.010 · Cited by 1
The use of functional MRI to study the endocrinology of appetite
Salem, V., & Dhillo, W. S. (2015)
Prevention of diabetes through lifestyle intervention
Drummen, M. (2019) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20190124md
Psychological Rigidity in Eating Disorders: Rigid Dietary Control and Cognitive Rigidity
정영인 (2018) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Novel Approaches to Improving Opioid Analgesic Therapy
Duron, D. I. (2020) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.018
Objectification and Self-Objectification
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.013
Essstörungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen
Legenbauer, T., & Bühren, K. (2021) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49289-5_114-1 · Cited by 1
Weight Stigma versus Weight Inclusivity
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.005
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.020
Problems with Current Approaches to Treating Disorders of Overeating
Wilcox, C. E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83078-6_4
Appearance Ideals and Media Literacy
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.004
Efeitos da dieta low-carb sobre os desejos intensos por comida
de Oliveira, J. (2022) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.5.2022.tde-28042022-092743
Overnight fasting affects avoidance learning and reliefPreprint
Papalini, S., Neefs, L., Beckers, T., Oudenhove, L. V., & Vervliet, B. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/muz38
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.003
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.009
Self-Compassion and Body Image Flexibility
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.008
Introduction to thePositive Body Image Workbook
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.001
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.015
Defining Beauty and Cultural Pride
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.007
Brain-based Etiology of Weight RegulationPreprint
Burger, K. S., & Sadler, J. R. (2017) · doi:10.31232/osf.io/yq2cz · Cited by 1
Self-citationWood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.024
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.006
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.002
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.021 · Cited by 2
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.014
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.011
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.017
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.012
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.016
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.023
Adaptive Appearance Investment and Quality of Life
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.022
Wood-Barcalow, N. L., Tylka, T. L., & Judge, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108758796.019
Essstörungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen
Legenbauer, T., & Bühren, K. (2024) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66744-6_114
Quand l’imagerie cérébrale éclaire les habitudes, préférences et décisions alimentaires
Val‐Laillet, D., & Renaud, I. (2024) · Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique · doi:10.1016/j.cnd.2024.07.005
Hébert-Seropian, B., Boucher, O., Citherlet, D., Robert, M., Richer, F., & Nguyen, D. K. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15060593 · Cited by 1
Interdisciplinary trends in the promotion of sustainable food choices
Carfora, V., & Catellani, P. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33140-4.00003-8
Appetite Regulation and Motivation to Eat in Eating Disorders
Murray, S. M., Kirchberg, M. C., & Kaye, W. H. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197675212.003.0007
Can frame-semantic congruence enhance incidental memory for food labels?
Johnson, T. M., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2025) · Cognitive Linguistic Studies · doi:10.1075/cogls.23018.joh
The Growth of the Brain in a Changing Environment
Biesalski, H. K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99121-9_10
Gamode, A. A., Malik, R. B., Butler, J., & Kubis, H. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18010177
“This highlights the sensitivity to food cues during negative energy balance after the overnight fast, in agreement with others [15].”
Hua, S., Wu, T., Atanda-Ogunleye, O., Ibrahim, A., Jansen, E., Smith, K., Fan, W., Chen, L., & Carnell, S. (2026) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2026.108535
Gautier, Y. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1169b49bz1289z4c70za20dz2e2032cbff00
Weight Suppression, Brain Reward Response to Food Cues, and Bulimic Behaviours: A Pilot fMRI Study
Singh, S., Jagannathan, K., Childress, A. R., et al. (2026) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.70127
Renaud, I., Coquery, N., Guittière, M.-O., Godet, A., Bannier, É., Serrand, Y., Moirand, R., Thibault, R., & Val‐Laillet, D. (2026) · Clinical Nutrition ESPEN · doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2026.103589
Kong, K. L., CRANDELL, A., & Carr, K. A. (2026) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-026-00736-1
“Human neuroimaging similarly shows increased activation in reward and attention networks following caloric deprivation [ 105].”
Exercise intervention modulates food reward in obesity: efficacy, mechanisms, and prospects
Dongfei, L. I. U., Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., & Mo, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2026.1895299
Metadata
- Authors
- Stice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stice, Eric
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 322-330
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3693571
- OpenAlex
- W2019359264
- Semantic Scholar
- d625270db3768000736d7210c91ae80a6f829b16
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R1MH64560A, DK080760, DK092468)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- caloric deprivation, dietary restraint, binge eating, food reward, negative energy balance, adolescents, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, motivation, weight loss diet
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Appetite, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Reward, Visual Perception, Caloric Restriction, Anticipation, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
