The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 61 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods
Open accessAbstract
Dietary restraint theoretically increases risk for binge eating, but prospective and experimental studies have produced contradictory findings, apparently because dietary restraint scales do not identify individuals who are reducing caloric intake. Yet, experimentally manipulated caloric deprivation increases responsivity of brain regions implicated in attention and reward to food images, which may contribute to binge eating. We tested whether self-imposed acute and longer-term caloric restriction increases responsivity of attention and reward regions to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food using functional magnetic resonance imaging among female and male adolescents (Study 1 n=34; Study 2 n=51/81). Duration of acute caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation in response to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen, and precentral gyrus respectively). Youth in a longer-term negative energy balance likewise showed greater activation in attention (anterior cingulate cortex, ventral medial prefrontal cortex), visual processing (superior visual cortex), reward (caudate) and memory (hippocampus) regions in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food relative to those in neutral or positive energy balance. Results confirm that self-imposed caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention, reward, and motivation regions to food, which may explain why caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In two fMRI studies of adolescents, longer self-imposed caloric deprivation and a 2-week negative energy balance were associated with greater responsivity of attention, reward, and motivation brain regions to palatable food images, anticipated milkshake receipt, and milkshake receipt. The authors argue this may help explain why caloric-deprivation weight-loss diets often do not produce lasting weight loss.
Key findings
- Study 1 (N = 34 female adolescents; mean deprivation 7.8 ± 4.6 hours, range 1–16): duration of caloric deprivation correlated positively with left OFC activation for appetizing > unappetizing food pictures and right precentral gyrus activation for appetizing > water pictures; no significant effects emerged for reverse contrasts or quadratic relations.
- Study 2 acute deprivation (n = 51; mean 6.9 ± 3.7 hours, range 3–22.5): hours since last caloric intake correlated positively with activation during milkshake cue > tasteless cue in regions including MTG, precentral gyrus, medial SFG, lingual gyrus, dlPFC, dorsal ACC, MFG, IOG, vlPFC, parahippocampal gyrus, putamen, cerebellum, thalamus, and MOG; for milkshake receipt > tasteless receipt, it correlated positively with left mid insula.
- Study 2 longer-term energy balance: the negative energy balance group (≥1 kg loss; n = 27; mean −1.5 ± 0.5 kg) showed greater activation than the positive energy balance group (n = 23; mean +1.7 ± 0.9 kg) in left precuneus, left mPFC, and right ventral ACC for anticipated receipt, and in left caudate and right precentral gyrus for receipt; versus the energy stable group (n = 31; mean −0.01 ± 0.08 kg), it showed greater activation in left cuneus, left dlPFC, and left PCC for anticipated receipt, and bilateral caudate, right hippocampus, left MOG, and left fusiform gyrus for receipt.
- Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation in Study 1 (p = 0.98; r = 0.004) or Study 2 (p = 0.46; r = 0.10), and did not differ across energy balance groups (p = 0.92).
Methods
- Two fMRI studies in adolescents. Study 1 included 34 healthy female adolescents (M age = 15.5 ± 0.9, BMI = 24.6 ± 5.6). Study 2 included 162 adolescent males and females (M age = 15.3 ± 1.07, BMI = 20.8 ± 1.90), but analyses used 51 participants with data on pre-scan caloric deprivation and 81 participants meeting weight-change criteria.
- Study 1 used a food-picture paradigm: participants rated 103 food pictures, then viewed their 40 most appetizing, 40 least appetizing, and 40 water pictures; contrasts were appetizing > unappetizing and appetizing > water, regressed on hours since last dietary intake.
- Study 2 used a milkshake receipt/anticipation paradigm with chocolate milkshake versus calorie-free tasteless solution; contrasts were milkshake receipt > tasteless receipt and milkshake cue > tasteless cue, regressed on hours since last caloric intake and compared across negative, stable, and positive energy balance groups based on 2-week weight change (lost ≥1 kg, remained within 0.1 kg, gained ≥1 kg). Imaging used SPM8 with whole-brain cluster-level correction (p < 0.001, k ≥ 11, corrected p < 0.05).
Limitations
- The paper states: there was no way to confirm that the negative energy balance group consumed fewer calories than needed on the actual scan day; only one palatable food was tested and it was a beverage, so generalization to solid foods is cautious; participants were adolescents, so results may not generalize to adults; and sample sizes, though larger than many imaging studies, were still moderate and may have limited power and generalizability.
- Evident from the text: the acute-deprivation analyses in Study 2 used only 51 of 162 participants because deprivation data were not collected for all; Study 1 included only females while Study 2 included both sexes; and the acute-deprivation findings are correlational, based on self-reported hours since last intake rather than experimentally manipulated deprivation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own result · 35 Not checked yet · 27 Own interpretation · 10 Own method · 2 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Youth in a longer-term negative energy balance likewise showed greater activation in attention (anterior cingulate cortex, ventral medial prefrontal cortex), visual processing (superior visual cortex), reward (caudate) and memory (hippocampus) regions in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food relative to those in neutral or positive energy balance.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Duration of acute caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation in response to images, anticipated receipt, and receipt of palatable food (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen, and precentral gyrus respectively).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
plaincorrelationaln = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the appetizing food > unappetizing food contrast, duration of caloric deprivation was positively related to activity in the left OFC (Figure 1A).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plaincorrelationaln = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no evidence of significant quadratic relations between hours of caloric deprivation and neural activation in response to images of appetizing foods.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the appetizing food > water contrast, duration of caloric deprivation was positively related to activity in the right precentral gyrus (Figure 1B).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plaincorrelationaln = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no significant effects when examining the unappetizing > appetizing food or water > appetizing food contrasts.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participant’s Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation (P = 0.98; r = 0.004)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants in a negative energy balance state during the scan in Study 2 compared to those in a positive or stable energy balance showed greater activation in the precuneus, mPFC, ventral ACC, cuneus, dlPFC, and PCC in response to anticipated receipt of milkshake.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The positive energy balance group did not show significantly greater activation in response to the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast compared to either energy stable or negative energy balance groups.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No significant effects emerged for the reverse contrasts.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 51- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
- It may state two separate claims as one. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On 1-20 point scales, participants rated the chocolate milkshake as highly pleasant (M = 14.2) and edible (M = 15.8) immediately before the scan.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 51- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants (N = 34) reported a mean deprivation of 7.8 ± 4.6 hours (range 1 to 16).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Again, participant’s Dutch Restrained Eating Scale scores were not significantly related to hours of food deprivation (P = 0.46, r = 0.10).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 51- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast, hours of caloric deprivation correlated positively with activation in the right hemisphere in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG), precentral gyrus, medial superior frontal gyrus (medial SFG), lingual gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, Figure 1C), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dorsal ACC), and middle frontal gyrus (MFG)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plaincorrelationaln = 51- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants (n = 51) reported a mean deprivation of 6.9 ± 3.7 hours (range 3 to 22.5).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 51- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those in the positive energy balance group (≥ 1kg in weight gain; n = 23) showed a mean weight gain of 1.7 ± 0.9kg (range 1.1 - 5.6kg) over the 2-week period.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 23- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the milkshake cue > tasteless solution cue contrast, participants in the negative energy balance group showed greater activation in the left precuneus, left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and right ventral ACC relative to the positive energy balance group and greater activation in the left cuneus, left dlPFC, and left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) relative to the energy stable group (Table”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
- Rests on an assumption: BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants in the energy stable group (remained within 0.1kg, n = 31) showed a trivial increase in mean weight (−0.01 ± 0.08kg; range −0.1 - 0.1kg).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 31- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hours since last caloric intake and negative energy balance status showed no correlation with scores on the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dietary restraint theoretically increases risk for binge eating”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“Theorists posit that dietary restraint increases risk for onset and maintenance of binge eating and bulimia nervosa (Fairburn, 1997; Polivy & Herman, 1985).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fairburn, 1997
- Not checked yetcites Polivy & Herman, 1985 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“prospective and experimental studies have produced contradictory findings”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“increases in bulimic symptoms (Johnson & Wardle, 2005; Stice, 2001; Wertheim, Koerner, & Paxton, 2001).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson & Wardle, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Stice, 2001 source
- Not checked yetcites Wertheim, Koerner, & Paxton, 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“some individuals may engage in true caloric restriction, which does increase risk for binge eating (Stice et al., 2010).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stice et al., 2010 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, randomized trials find that assignment to energy-deficit weight loss interventions versus waitlist control conditions results in significant decreases in binge eating for healthy young adults”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Groesz & Stice, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Presnell & Stice, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Goodrick, Poston, Kimball, Reeves & Foreyt, 1998
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because we used larger samples (N = 34, 51, & 81) than employed in past studies (N = 10 to 20), we were able to conduct whole-brain analyses, rather than region of interest analyses, which should provide a more comprehensive and reliable index of the effect of elective dietary restriction in neural response to food.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
hedgeddirectn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants who moved greater 2mm or 2° in any direction were excluded from analyses.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“rats randomized to extreme caloric deprivation conditions (in which they lost 7% - 20% of their body mass) eat significantly more calories during ad lib feeding and show a preference for high-fat foods immediately after the deprivation period relative to non-deprived rats”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagan, Chandler, Wauford, Rybak, & Oswald, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Lucas & Sclafani, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Ogawa et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another gap in the literature is that few studies have investigated the effects of elective longer-term caloric deprivation; the fMRI experiments described above only investigated the effects of acute caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The effects remained when potential outliers were excluded for these and subsequently reported effects.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
plainn = 34- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Because findings did not change when this covariate was included, results from analyses that did not include this covariate are reported.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dreher et al., 2007 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“potentially because of the small samples used in these studies (Ns = 10 to 20).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“though null effects also emerged (Siep et al., 2009; Uher et al., 2006)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“humans randomized to periods of caloric deprivation work longer on operant tasks to earn high-calorie snack foods and eat more snack foods than non-deprived controls”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cameron, Goldfield, Cyr, & Doucet, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Epstein et al., 2003 source
- Not checked yetcites Raynor & Epstein, 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resulting threshold of p < 0.001 with a cluster (k) ≥ 11 was considered corrected for multiple comparisions across the whole brain.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This scale has shown internal consistency (α’s range from .93 to .95) and temporal reliability (2-week test-retest r = .82; Stice, et al., 2004; van Strien et al., 1986).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.3 Dutch Restrained Eating Scale
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random effects analyses were used to account for both within-group and within-subject variance.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Prospective acquisition correction (PACE) was applied to adjust slice position and orientation, as well as to re-grid residual volume-to-volume motion in real-time during data acquisition for the purpose of reducing motion-induced effects in Study 2 (Thesen et al., 2000).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thesen et al., 2000 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, data suggest that true caloric restriction may increase the reward value of food, such that the longer the caloric deprivation, the greater the activation of attention and reward regions in response to food, which putatively increases the likelihood of food intake.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A cluster level threshold of p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain for each study were derived using Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) of random noise distribution in the whole brain mask (3×3×3mm) using the 3dClustSim in AFNI (Cox, 1996; Forman et al., 1995).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.6 Imaging acquisition, preprocessing and analysis
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fMRI experiments in which participants were randomly assigned to a period of caloric deprivation or a non-deprivation condition have strong internal validity, but limited external validity because participants did not voluntarily elect to engage in caloric restriction, as occurs in real-world dieters.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In response to pictures of palatable foods, individuals who had successfully recovered from obesity showed greater activation in a region associated with inhibitory control (the superior frontal region) than obese and normal weight individuals, greater activation in a region involved in visual attention (middle temporal region) than normal weight individuals, and less activation in a motor”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McCaffery et al., 2009 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although this scale correlates with self-reported caloric intake, like all dietary restraint or dieting scales, it does not correlate with objectively measured caloric intake (e.g., Ouwens et al., 2003; Stice, et al., 2004).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 2.3 Dutch Restrained Eating Scale
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Experimental research with rats has revealed that acute food deprivation and chronic caloric deprivation results in increased DA release at feeding and increased D2 receptor binding (Thanos et al., 2008)”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thanos et al., 2008 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interesting, animal experiments show that caloric deprivation selectively increases preferences for high-fat foods (Lucas & Sclafani, 1992).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lucas & Sclafani, 1992
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the findings from Study 1 and Study 2 suggest that duration of acute calorie deprivation is related to greater reward valuation of and attention to palatable food pictures and food cues and potentially with greater motivation to obtain or consume the food.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Abstinence from cocaine after a period of regular use resulted in a 17% increase in cells that selectively fire in response to cocaine directed behavior”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cameron & Carelli, 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, results imply that caloric deprivation increases responsivity to real food much more than it does to images of food, probably because pictures of food hold no caloric value for hungry people.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data collectively suggest that caloric deprivation increases D2R receptor sensitization, which could explain the greater reward value of food after caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Mechanisms of caloric deprivation observed in rats generalize to humans.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, we investigated neural response to receipt and anticipated receipt of only one palatable food and it was a beverage.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and elevated D2Rs showed enhanced effector striatal coupling (Carr et al., 2003).”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carr et al., 2003 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results should be generalized with caution to other palatable foods, particularly solid foods.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, although the samples used in these studies are larger than those typically used in brain imaging studies, they were still only moderate in magnitude, which may have limited our statistical power and the generalizability of our findings.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, because participants in these two studies were adolescents, results may not generalize to adults.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Administration of the D1R agonist SFK-82958 produced enhanced striatal activation”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carr et al., 2003 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most critically, findings imply that weight loss diets that involve the replacement of unhealthy energy dense foods with healthy low energy density foods should be more effective than diets that involve long periods of caloric deprivation.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion > 4.1 Conclusions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results imply that if people attempt to lose weight by abstaining from food intake for long durations of time, it will have the effect of increasing the reward value of food, which may lead to poor food choices when the individual eventually does eat.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, although the samples used in these studies are larger than those typically used in brain imaging studies, they were still only moderate in magnitude, which may have limited our statistical power and the generalizability of our findings.”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 4. Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Weight change over the 2-week period is a valid index of negative, neutral, or positive energy balance.
“To assess the impact of longer-term energy balance we used weight change over the 2-week period during which the scan occurred to group participants into three a priori groups”
“This allowed us to contrast the neural response of individuals who were in an objectively measured negative energy balance to those who were in an energy stable or positive energy balance state when the scan took place.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Number of hours since last caloric intake is a valid measure of acute caloric deprivation.
“participants reported the number of hours since their last dietary intake (to the nearest quarter hour)”
“duration of caloric deprivation”
The paper relies on this without support.
BOLD response in attention and reward regions reflects responsivity or reward value to food.
“BOLD response was contrasted during receipt of milkshake versus tasteless solution”
“activation in regions implicated in attention, reward, and motivation”
The paper relies on this without support.
Caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.
“which may explain why caloric deprivation weight loss diets typically do not produce lasting weight loss.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participants' self-reported duration of elective acute caloric deprivation accurately reflects their actual caloric deprivation.
“participants reporting a longer duration of elective acute caloric deprivation”
“Hours since last caloric intake and negative energy balance status showed no correlation with scores on the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mechanisms of caloric deprivation observed in rats generalize to humans.
“These data collectively suggest that caloric deprivation increases D2R receptor sensitization, which could explain the greater reward value of food after caloric deprivation.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The targeted-effect size was chosen based on findings from studies employing CIC paradigms for drug craving52, food cravings25,37,53,54 and internet gaming craving27, which report medium-to-large effect sizes in cue reactivity52.”
From Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
“showed a trivial increase in mean weight”
§ Caloric Deprivation Increases Responsivity of Attention and Reward Brain Regions to Intake, Anticipated Intake, and Images of Palatable Foods > 2. Methods > 3.1 Results
“(−0.01 ± 0.08kg; range −0.1 - 0.1kg)”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.110 · Cited by 5,340
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,539
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,279
Stice, E. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.124 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationChanges in brain activity related to eating chocolate: From pleasure to aversion
Small, D. M. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.9.1720 · Cited by 1,179
Neumark-Sztainer, D., Wall, M., Guo, J., Story, M., Haines, J., & Eisenberg, M. (2006) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.003 · Cited by 939
Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods
Stoeckel, L. E., Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Twieg, D. B., Knowlton, R. C., & Cox, J. E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.031 · Cited by 857
Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., Veldhuizen, M. G., & Small, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013600 · Cited by 779
Self-citationUsing Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4549-07.2007 · Cited by 744
The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain
Maddock, R. J. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01374-5 · Cited by 733
Rothemund, Y., Preuschhof, C., Bohner, G., Bauknecht, H.-C., Klingebiel, R., Flor, H., & Klapp, B. F. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.008 · Cited by 679
Images of desire: food-craving activation during fMRI
Pelchat, M. L., Johnson, A., Chan, R., Valdez, J., & Ragland, J. D. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.023 · Cited by 667
Weight concerns influence the development of eating disorders: A 4-year prospective study.
Killen, J. D., Taylor, C. B., Hayward, C., Haydel, K. F., Wilson, D. M., Hammer, L., Kraemer, H., Blair-Greiner, A., & Strachowski, D. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.5.936 · Cited by 641
Weight concerns influence the development of eating disorders: A 4-year prospective study.
Killen, J. D., Taylor, C. B., Hayward, C., Haydel, K. F., Wilson, D. M., Hammer, L., Kraemer, H., Blair-Greiner, A., & Strachowski, D. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.936 · Cited by 641
Dietary Restraint, Body Dissatisfaction, and Psychological Distress: A Prospective Analysis.
Johnson, F., & Wardle, J. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.1.119 · Cited by 638
Small, D. M., Jones-Gotman, M., & Dagher, A. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00253-2 · Cited by 632
Neuroanatomical correlates of hunger and satiation in humans using positron emission tomography
Tataranni, P. A., Gautier, J., Chen, K., Uecker, A., Bandy, D. J., Salbe, A. D., Pratley, R. E., Lawson, M. A., Reiman, E. M., & Ravussin, É. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.8.4569 · Cited by 592
Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods
Killgore, W. D. S., Young, A. D., Femia, L. A., Bogorodzki, P., Rogowska, J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00191-5 · Cited by 581
Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women
Dreher, J.-C., Schmidt, P. J., Kohn, P., Furman, D., Rubinow, D., & Berman, K. F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605569104 · Cited by 567
Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli
Pessoa, L., Kästner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00214-8 · Cited by 538
The Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., & Jones, J. V. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.11.2.141 · Cited by 447
Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans
LaBar, K. S., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Kim, Y.-H., Nobre, A. C., & Mesulam, M. M. (2001) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.115.2.493 · Cited by 444
Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.015 · Cited by 439
Due, D. L., Huettel, S. A., HALL, W. G., & Rubin, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.954 · Cited by 437
Siep, N., Roefs, A., Roebroeck, A., Havermans, R., Bonte, M. L., & Jansen, A. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.035 · Cited by 375
Stice, E., Fisher, M., & Lowe, M. R. (2004) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.51 · Cited by 364
Fasting biases brain reward systems towards high‐calorie foods
Goldstone, A. P., Prechtl de Hernandez, C. G., Beaver, J. D., Muhammed, K., Croese, C., Bell, G., Durighel, G., Hughes, E., Waldman, A. D., Frost, G., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06949.x · Cited by 356
Overweight children overeat after exposure to food cues
Jansen, A. T. M., Theunissen, N. C. M., Slechten, K., Nederkoorn, C., Boon, B. J. F., Mulkens, S., & Roefs, A. (2003) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s1471-0153(03)00011-4 · Cited by 336
Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences
Wang, G.-J., Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Cervany, P., Hitzemann, R. J., Pappas, N. R., Wong, C. T., & Felder, C. (1999) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00619-5 · Cited by 336
Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy
Williams, R. M. (1998) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10026-2 · Cited by 303
Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive
Wilson, C., Nomikos, G., Collu, M., & Fibiger, H. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05169.1995 · Cited by 294
The temporal response of the brain after eating revealed by functional MRI
Liu, Y., Gao, J., Liu, H., & Fox, P. T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016590 · Cited by 291
Bruce, A. S., Holsen, L. M., Chambers, R. J., Martin, L. E., Brooks, W. M., Zarcone, J. R., Butler, M. G., & Savage, C. R. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.84 · Cited by 282
Neural Mechanisms Associated With Food Motivation in Obese and Healthy Weight Adults
Martin, L. E., Holsen, L. M., Chambers, R. J., Bruce, A. S., Brooks, W. M., Zarcone, J. R., Butler, M. G., & Savage, C. R. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2009.220 · Cited by 278
The role of breakfast In the treatment of obesity: a randomized clinical trial
Schlundt, D., Hill, J., Sbrocco, T., Pope-Cordle, J., & Sharp, T. (1992) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/55.3.645 · Cited by 275
Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food
Epstein, L. H., Truesdale, R., Wojcik, A., Paluch, R. A., & Raynor, H. A. (2003) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00978-2 · Cited by 267
Hahn, B., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.177 · Cited by 264
Weight loss attempts in adults: goals, duration, and rate of weight loss.
Williamson, D. F., Serdula, M. K., Anda, R. F., Levy, A. S., & Byers, T. (1992) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.82.9.1251 · Cited by 260
Haase, L., Cerf-Ducastel, B., & Murphy, C. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.044 · Cited by 259
Cerebral processing of food-related stimuli: effects of fasting and gender
Uher, R., Treasure, J., Heining, M., Brammer, M. J., & Campbell, I. C. (2006) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.12.008 · Cited by 258
Odorant-Induced and Sniff-Induced Activation in the Cerebellum of the Human
Sobel, N., Prabhakaran, V., Hartley, C. A., Desmond, J. E., Zhao, Z., Glover, G. H., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Sullivan, E. V. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08990.1998 · Cited by 246
Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology
Banich, M. T. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 237
Food for thought: hedonic experience beyond homeostasis in the human brain
Kringelbach, M. L. (2004) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.035 · Cited by 236
Wertheim, E. H., Koerner, J., & Paxton, S. J. (2001) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1005224921891 · Cited by 233
Brain activity in hunger and satiety: an exploratory visually stimulated fMRI study
Führer, D., Zysset, S., & Stumvoll, M. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.33 · Cited by 218
Fasting increases risk for onset of binge eating and bulimic pathology: A 5-year prospective study.
Stice, E. M., Davis, K. R., Miller, N. P., & Marti, C. N. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013644 · Cited by 216
Self-citationEffect of Satiation on Brain Activity in Obese and Lean Women
Gautier, J., Parigi, A. D., Chen, K., Salbe, A. D., Bandy, D. J., Pratley, R. E., Ravussin, É., Reiman, E. M., & Tataranni, P. A. (2001) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2001.92 · Cited by 207
Hagan, M. M., Chandler-Laney, P. C., Wauford, P. K., Rybak, R. J., & Oswald, K. D. (2003) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10168 · Cited by 202
Stice, E. M., Cooper, J. A., Schoeller, D. A., Tappe, K. A., & Lowe, M. R. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.449 · Cited by 201
Self-citationTendency toward overeating and restraint as predictors of food consumption
Ouwens, M. A., van Strien, T., & van der Staak, C. P. F. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00006-0 · Cited by 180
Yoshida, M., Yokoo, H., Mizoguchi, K., Kawahara, H., Tsuda, A., Nishikawa, T., & Tanaka, M. (1992) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(92)90861-z · Cited by 179
Bathalon, G. P., Tucker, K. L., Hays, N. P., Vinken, A. G., Greenberg, A. S., McCrory, M. A., & Roberts, S. B. (2000) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.3.739 · Cited by 177
Evidence of increased dopamine receptor signaling in food-restricted rats
Carr, K. D., Tsimberg, Y., Berman, Y., & Yamamoto, N. (2003) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00227-6 · Cited by 167
Stice, E., Sysko, R., Roberto, C. A., & Allison, S. (2010) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.009 · Cited by 166
Self-citationThe relative-reinforcing value of food under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction
Raynor, H. A., & Epstein, L. H. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00161-7 · Cited by 164
McCaffery, J. M., Haley, A. P., Sweet, L. H., Phelan, S., Raynor, H. A., Del Parigi, A., Cohen, R., & Wing, R. R. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27924 · Cited by 161
Nondieting versus dieting treatment for overweight binge-eating women.
Goodrick, G. K., Carlos, I. P. W. S., Kimball, K. T., Reeves, R. S., & Foreyt, J. P. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.363 · Cited by 156
Presnell, K. E., & Stice, E. M. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.1.166 · Cited by 145
Self-citationAvena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.017 · Cited by 138
Burger, K. S., & Stice, E. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.009 · Cited by 138
Self-citationThanos, P. K., Michaelides, M., Piyis, Y. K., Wang, G., & Volkow, N. D. (2008) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.20468 · Cited by 135
Responsivity to food stimuli in obese and lean binge eaters using functional MRI
Geliebter, A., Ladell, T., Logan, M. S., Schweider, T., Sharafi, M., & Joy Hirsch, C. (2005) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.09.002 · Cited by 121
Nondieting versus dieting treatment for overweight binge-eating women.
Goodrick, G. K., Poston, W. S. C., Kimball, K. T., et al. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.363 · Cited by 119
Eating behavior among women with anorexia nervosa
Sysko, R., Walsh, B. T., Schebendach, J., & Wilson, G. T. (2005) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/82.2.296 · Cited by 107
Evaluation of a healthy-weight treatment program for bulimia nervosa: A preliminary randomized trial
Burton, E. M., & Stice, E. M. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.008 · Cited by 101
Self-citationEffects of repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake
Hetherington, M. M., Bell, A., & Rolls, B. J. (2000) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700010336517 · Cited by 99
Leidy, H. J., Lepping, R. J., Savage, C. R., & Harris, C. T. (2011) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2011.108 · Cited by 94
Cameron, J. D., Goldfield, G. S., Cyr, M.-J., & Doucet, É. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.02.014 · Cited by 79
Brain imaging studies of appetite in the context of obesity and the menstrual cycle
Vugt, D. A. V. (2009) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp051 · Cited by 72
Consistency of food intake over four eating sessions in the laboratory
Martin, C. K., Williamson, D. A., Geiselman, P. J., Walden, H. M., Smeets, M. A. M., Morales, S., & Redmann, S. M. (2005) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.03.002 · Cited by 68
Nutrient Intake of Obese Female Binge Eaters
Reeves, R. S., McPherson, R. S., Nichaman, M. Z., Harrist, R. B., Foreyt, J. P., & Goodrick, G. K. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00055-4 · Cited by 62
Weight-control behaviors and subsequent weight change among adolescents and young adult females
Field, A. E., Haines, J., ROSNER, B. A., & Willett, W. C. (2009) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28321 · Cited by 55
Cameron, C. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2012) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08024.x · Cited by 54
Sensory properties of a nonabsorbable fat substitute did not affect regulation of energy intake
Rolls, B., Castellanos, V., Shide, D. J., Miller, D., Pelkman, C., Thorwart, M., & Peters, J. (1997) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/65.5.1375 · Cited by 43
Groesz, L. M., & Stice, E. M. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.010 · Cited by 34
Self-citationExpectancies, dietary restraint, and test meal intake among undergraduate women
Sysko, R., Timothy Walsh, B., & Terence Wilson, G. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.11.002 · Cited by 27
Food Deprivation Increases the Rat's Preference for a Fatty Flavor Over a Sweet Taste
Lucas, F., & Sclafani, A. J. (1996) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/21.2.169 · Cited by 27
Chronic food restriction and reduced dietary fat: risk factors for bouts of overeating
OGAWA, R., STRADER, A., CLEGG, D., SAKAI, R., SEELEY, R., & WOODS, S. (2005) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.028 · Cited by 15
Slow vasomotor fluctuation in fMRI of anesthetized child brain
Kiviniemi, V., Jauhiainen, J., Tervonen, O., P��kk�, E., Oikarinen, J., Vainionp��, V., Rantala, H., & Biswal, B. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3
van Strien (1986) · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(198605)5:4
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gautier, 1999, Increased cortical representation of hunger and satiation in obese men, Diabetes, 48, A312
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger
Tomova, L., Wang, K. L., Thompson, T., Matthews, G. A., Takahashi, A., Tye, K. M., & Saxe, R. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00742-z · Cited by 283
“The targeted effect size was chosen based on findings from studies employing cue-induced craving paradigms for drug craving (53) , food cravings (28, (54) (55) (56) and internet gaming craving (30) which report medium to large effect sizes in cue reactivity (53) .”
Shared and unique mechanisms underlying binge eating disorder and addictive disorders
Schulte, E. M., Grilo, C. M., & Gearhardt, A. N. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.02.001 · Cited by 271
Brooks, S. J., Cedernaes, J., & Schiöth, H. B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060393 · Cited by 269
“We observed increased activation in the left dorsomedial prefrontal, right precentral and right parahippocampal gyri in obese subjects, regions linked to attention, motor coordination, and explicit memory, and that are implicated in processes associated with the anticipation of food intake, particularly during perceiv…”
BackgroundA Review of Interventions that Promote Eating by Internal Cues.
Schaefer, J. T., & Magnuson, A. B. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.024 · Cited by 227
“Physiologically, dieting or energy deprivation activates portions of the brain responsible for attention (anterior cingulate cortex) and reward (amygdala) of food.(11) Increasing the reward value of high-energy foods in the brain increases the likelihood of food intake and may result in binge eating.”
BackgroundByrne, C. S., Chambers, E. S., Alhabeeb, H., Chhina, N., Morrison, D. J., Preston, T., Tedford, C., Fitzpatrick, J., Irani, C., Busza, A., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.126706 · Cited by 201
“Similarly, satiation decreases BOLD responses to food taste in the nucleus accumbens (31), whereas duration of food deprivation correlates with a greater caudate BOLD signal in response to actual and anticipated receipt of palatable food (29).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Stice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stice, Eric
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 322-330
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3693571
- OpenAlex
- W2019359264
- Semantic Scholar
- d625270db3768000736d7210c91ae80a6f829b16
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 11.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R1MH64560A, DK080760, DK092468)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- caloric deprivation, dietary restraint, binge eating, food reward, negative energy balance, adolescents, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, motivation, weight loss diet
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Appetite, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Reward, Visual Perception, Caloric Restriction, Anticipation, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
