Cited by 141Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data

van Belle, Janna, Vink, Matthijs, Durston, Sarah, Zandbelt, Bram B.·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Response inhibition involves proactive and reactive modes. Proactive inhibition is goal-directed, triggered by warning cues, and serves to restrain actions. Reactive inhibition is stimulus-driven, triggered by salient stop-signals, and used to stop actions completely. Functional MRI studies have identified brain regions that activate during proactive and reactive inhibition. It remains unclear how these brain regions operate in functional networks, and whether proactive and reactive inhibition depend on common networks, unique networks, or a combination. To address this we analyzed a large fMRI dataset (N=65) of a stop-signal task designed to measure proactive and reactive inhibition, using independent component analysis (ICA). We found 1) three frontal networks that were associated with both proactive and reactive inhibition, 2) one network in the superior parietal lobe, which also included dorsal premotor cortex and left putamen, that was specifically associated with proactive inhibition, and 3) two right-lateralized frontal and fronto-parietal networks, including the right inferior frontal gyrus and temporoparietal junction as well as a bilateral fronto-temporal network that were uniquely associated with reactive inhibition. Overlap between networks was observed in dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices. Taken together, we offer a new perspective on the neural underpinnings of inhibitory control, by showing that proactive inhibition and reactive inhibition are supported by a group of common and unique networks that appear to integrate and interact in frontoparietal areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.014

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective integration of cognitive control processes relies not only on functional recruitment of implicated brain regions but also on the strength of connectivity among them.

    “The effective integration of these processes relies not only on the functional recruitment of implicated brain regions, but also on the strength of connectivity among them (Hwang et al., 2010, van Belle et al., 2014).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as van Belle et al., 2014

  • The use of data generated from stop signal tasks to assess action cancellation drew more on proactive than reactive control for inhibiting inappropriate responses.

    “Third, the use of the data generated from stop signal tasks to assess action cancellation drew more on proactive than reactive control for inhibiting inappropriate responses (Aron 2011; Vink et al. 2014; Van Belle et al. 2014; Vink et al. 2015).”
  • Specific neural correlates for each subcategory of response inhibition may help identify phenotypes for mental disorders such as schizophrenia and ADHD.

    “Moreover, specific neural correlates for each subcategory of response inhibition may also help us to identify phenotypes for mental disorders (Van Belle et al. 2014), such as schizophrenia and ADHD.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Belle, J., Vink, M., Durston, S., & Zandbelt, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
103
Pages
65-74
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987055966
Cited by
141
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
response inhibition, proactive inhibition, reactive inhibition, inhibitory control, artificial neural networks, stop-signal task, frontal network, superior parietal lobule, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, right hemisphere lateralization, temporoparietal junction, inferior frontal gyrus, putamen, dorsal premotor cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Reactive Inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review