CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 367Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autobiographical and episodic memory—one and the same?

Gilboa, Asaf·2004·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Laboratory investigations of episodic memory often require participants to encode and later retrieve lists of items (words, pictures, or faces). The underlying assumption is that recollection of items from the list is analogous to recollection of events from one's past, i.e. autobiographical re-experiencing. Functional neuroimaging studies of episodic memory have provided extensive evidence suggesting that regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) play a role in episodic memory retrieval. A review of PFC activations reported in imaging studies of autobiographical memory and matched sub-sets of list-learning episodic memory studies reveals patterns of similarity but also substantial differences. Episodic memory studies often report activations in the right mid-dorsolateral PFC, but such activations are absent in autobiographical memory studies. Additionally, activations in the ventromedial PFC, primarily on the left, are almost invariably found in autobiographical memory studies, but rarely occur in studies of episodic memory. It is suggested that these two regions mediate different modes of post-retrieval monitoring and verification. Autobiographical memory relies on quick intuitive 'feeling of rightness' to monitor the veracity and cohesiveness of retrieved memories in relation to an activated self-schema. Episodic memory for lists requires more conscious elaborate monitoring to avoid omissions, commissions and repetitions. The present analysis suggests that care and caution should be exercised in extrapolating from the way we recollect 'events' from a list learned in the laboratory to the way we recollect events from our lives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.014

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gilboa, A., & Moscovitch, M. (2002). The cognitive neuroscience of confabulation: A review and a model. In A. D. Baddeley, M. D. Kopelman, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (2nd ed., pp. 315–342). London: Wiley.
  2. Moscovitch, M. (1989). Confabulation and the frontal systems: Strategic versus associative retrieval in neuropsychological theories of memory. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 133–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Ranganath, 2003, Medial temporal lobe activity associated with active maintenance of novel information, Learning, Learning & Memory, 10, 253

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gilboa, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Gilboa, Asaf
ORCID
Gilboa, Asaf
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1336-1349
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.014
OpenAlex
W1583495198
Cited by
367
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, episodic memory, prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, memory retrieval, recollection, self-schemas, list learning
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Electrophysiology, Humans, Memory, Psychological Theory, Self Concept, Semantics, Verbal Learning, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review