Cited by 45Schizophrenia research and treatmentReading and Literacy DevelopmentVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Impaired magnocellular/dorsal stream activation predicts impaired reading ability in schizophrenia

Open access
Martínez, Antígona, Revheim, Nadine, Butler, Pamela D., Guilfoyle, David N., Dias, Elisa C., Javitt, Daniel C.·2013·NeuroImage: Clinical

Abstract

In healthy humans, passage reading depends upon a critical organizing role played by the magnocellular/dorsal visual pathway. In a recent study, we found a significant correlation between orthographic reading deficits in schizophrenia and deficits in contrast sensitivity to low spatial frequency stimuli, suggesting an underlying magnocellular processing abnormality. The interrelationship between magnocellular dysfunction and passage reading impairments in schizophrenia was investigated in 21 patients with schizophrenia and 17 healthy control volunteers using behavioral and functional MRI (fMRI) based measures. fMRI activation patterns during passage- and single-word reading were evaluated in relation to cortical areas with differential sensitivity to low versus high spatial frequency cortical regions indentified using a phase-encoded fMRI paradigm. On average, patients with schizophrenia read at the 6th grade level, despite completion of more than 12 years of education and estimated normal pre-morbid IQ. Schizophrenia patients also showed significantly impaired contrast sensitivity to low spatial frequencies and abnormal neural activity in response to stimulation with low spatial frequencies, consistent with dysfunction of magnocellular processing. Further, these magnocellular deficits were predictive of poor performance on a standardized psychoeducational test of passage reading. These findings suggest that reading is an important index of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and highlight the contribution of magnocellular dysfunction to overall cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nicl.2012.09.006

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Martínez, A., Revheim, N., Butler, P. D., Guilfoyle, D. N., Dias, E. C., & Javitt, D. C.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Venue
NeuroImage: Clinical
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013
Volume
2
Pages
8-16
ISSN
2213-1582 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085615063
Cited by
45
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage Clinical (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (R21MH075849, R24MH082790, P50MH86385)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
schizophrenia, reading disorders, magnocellular pathway, dorsal stream, passage reading, contrast sensitivity, cognitive impairment, brain activation patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review