Cited by 260Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Evidence of Developmental Differences in Implicit Sequence Learning: An fMRI Study of Children and Adults

Thomas, Kathleen M., Hunt, Ruskin H., Vizueta, Nathalie, Sommer, Tobias, Durston, Sarah, Yang, Yihong, Worden, Michael S.·2004·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Prevailing theories of implicit or unaware learning propose a developmental invariance model, with implicit function maturing early in infancy or childhood despite prolonged improvements in explicit or intentional learning and memory systems across childhood. Neuroimaging studies of adult visuomotor sequence learning have associated fronto-striatal brain regions with implicit learning of spatial sequences. Given evidence of continued development in these brain regions during childhood, we compare implicit sequence learning in adults and 7- to 11-year-old children to examine potential developmental differences in the recruitment of fronto-striatal circuitry during implicit learning. Participants performed a standard serial reaction time task. Stimuli alternately followed a fixed 10-step sequence of locations or were presented in a pseudorandom order of locations. Adults outperformed children, achieving a significantly larger sequence learning effect and showing learning more quickly than children. Age-related differences in activity were observed in the premotor cortex, putamen, hippocampus, inferotemporal cortex, and parietal cortex. We observed differential recruitment of cortical and subcortical motor systems between groups, presumably reflecting age differences in motor response execution. Adults showed greater hippocampal activity for sequence trials, whereas children demonstrated greater signal during random trials. Activity in the right caudate correlated significantly…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/0898929042304688

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differential recruitment of prefrontal and subcortical regions has been reported across a number of developmental fMRI studies.

    “Differential recruitment of prefrontal and subcortical regions has been reported across a number of developmental fMRI studies (Casey et al. 2002; Monk et al. 2003; Thomas et al. 2004).”

    From <i>The Adolescent Brain</i> (2008) · cites this paper as Thomas et al. 2004

  • In children, skill performance is generally much slower, less accurate, and less automated than in adults, particularly in the initial stage of training.

    “In children, skill performance is generally much slower, less accurate, and less automated than in adults, particularly in the initial stage of training (318, 385, 1185), which gives rise to the question of whether sleep enhances skill memories also in children if presleep performance is improved to a level comparable with that in adults.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1185]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, K. M., Hunt, R. H., Vizueta, N., Sommer, T., Durston, S., Yang, Y., & Worden, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1339-1351
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2107564662
Cited by
260
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH002024, K01 MH02024)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
implicit sequence learning, developmental differences, children, adults, serial reaction time task, frontostriatal circuits, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, putamen, premotor cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child Development, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Putamen, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Serial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review