Cited by 336Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionPersonality Traits and PsychologyWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Relationships between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: a study with adults

Baughman, Holly M., Dearing, Sylvia, Giammarco, Erica, Vernon, Philip A.·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.020

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vernon, Philip A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
571-575
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048360397
Cited by
336
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
bullying, Dark Triad, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, adult bullying, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review