Cited by 22Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyberbullying among children and youth in Türkiye: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Erbiçer, Eyüp Sabır, Ceylan, Vedat, Yalçın, Mehmet Hanifi, Erbiçer, Sinem, Akın, Ercan, Koçtürk, Nilüfer, Doğan, Türkan·2023·Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Problem It has been reported in various studies that identifying risk and protective factors and outcomes of cyberbullying perpetration (CP) and cyberbullying victimization (CV) is crucial for educational strategies to fight against cyberbullying. The main purpose of the present study is to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review to identify which risk and protective factors are more strongly associated with CP/CV and possible consequences of CP/CV among children and youth in Türkiye.Eligibility criteria Various databases, including PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), ProQuest, ERIC, SCOPUS, Turkish Psychiatry Index, DergiPark, and National Dissertation/Thesis Center of Türkiye were searched to identify relevant studies.Sample Fifty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria included in the present study.Results Results revealed that the strongest risk factor was traditional bullying for CP (r = 0.47, p < .001) and traditional victimization for CV (r = 0.43, p < .001). The strongest protective factor was social skill for CP (r = -0.45, p < .001) and empathy for CV (r = -0.25, p < .001). In addition, involvement in CP behaviors had the strongest effect on negative self-concept (r = 0.28, p < .001), while exposure to CV on anxiety (r = 0.35, p < .001).Conclusions Although this study has some limitations, the study's findings are important source of information for many professionals, such as pediatric nurses, school psychological counselors, psychologists, and policymakers to further educational strategies for children and young people in Türkiye.Implications The study findings would be useful for developing educational programs to strengthen protective factors and reduce risk factors to prevent cyberbullying perpetration behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.09.003

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erbiçer, E. S., Ceylan, V., Yalçın, M. H., Erbiçer, S., Akın, E., Koçtürk, N., & Doğan, T.
Affiliations
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Hasan Kalyoncu University (TR)
Corresponding author
Erbiçer, Eyüp Sabır
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
73
Pages
184-195
ISSN
0882-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386624131
Cited by
22
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hasan Kalyoncu University Institutional Repository (Hasan Kalyoncu University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (T\u00DCB\u0130TAK ARDEB-122G020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, risk factors, protective factors, traditional bullying, social skills, empathy, self-concept, anxiety, children and young people, Turkey
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Risk Factors, Turkey, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review