Cited by 299Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionWorkplace Violence and Bullying

A META-ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF CYBERBULLYING PERPETRATION AND VICTIMIZATION

Guo, Siying·2016·Psychology in the Schools

Abstract

Previous studies so far have investigated various aspects of cyberbullying. Using meta-analytic approaches, the study was primarily to determine the target factors predicting individuals’ perpetration and victimization in cyberbullying. A meta-analysis of 77 studies containing 418 primary effect sizes was conducted to exam the relative magnitude of demographic, individual, and contextual predictors. Several study characteristics (i.e., sample age, sample gender, study location, publication status, and publication year) were further analyzed as moderators. The results showed the average effect size of each predictor for both cyberbully and cybervictim groups. Several significant shared and unique predictors were identified as important factors for designing effective prevention and intervention programs. The implications of the findings for future research were discussed in relation to interventions on cyberbullying.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pits.21914

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, S.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Guo, Siying
Venue
Psychology in the Schools
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
432-453
ISSN
0033-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2286468323
Cited by
299
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology in the Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, predictors of cyberbullying, demographic factors, personal factors, contextual factors, moderators, cyberbullying prevention, cyberbullying intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review