Cited by 259Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Changes in cortical activity after training of working memory — a single-subject analysis

Westerberg, Helena, Klingberg, Torkel·2007·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Working memory (WM) capacity is an important factor for a wide range of cognitive skills. This capacity has generally been assumed to be fixed. However, recent studies have suggested that WM can be improved by intensive, computerized training [Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen P, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlström K, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 2005;44:177--86]. A recent study by Olesen, Westerberg and Klingberg [Olesen P, Westerberg H, Klingberg T. Increased prefrontal and parietal brain activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:75--9] showed that group analysis of brain activity data show increases in prefrontal and parietal cortices after WM training. In the present study we performed single-subject analysis of the changes in brain activity after five weeks of training. Three young, healthy adults participated in the study. On two separate days before practice and during one day after practice, brain activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during performance of a WM and a baseline task. Practice on the WM tasks gradually improved performance and this effect lasted several months. The effect of practice also generalized to improve performance on a non-trained WM task and a reasoning task. After training, WM-related brain activity was significantly increased in the middle and inferior frontal gyrus. The changes in activity were not due to activations of any additional area that was not activated before training. Instead, the changes could best be described by small increases in the extent of the area of activated cortex. The effect of training of WM is thus in several respects similar to the changes in the functional map observed in primate studies of skill learning, although the physiological effect in WM training is located in the prefrontal association cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.041

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of the neural mechanism of working memory training in healthy adults suggest training increases prefrontal and parietal cortex activity.

    “Studies of the neural mechanism of action of WMT in 2 modestly sized functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in healthy adults (n03 and n08) in Olesen et al. [35] and (n03) in Westerberg and Klingberg [41] suggest that WMT increases brain activity in the PFC and parietal cortex [35]”
  • Plasticity accounts lack specificity to accommodate limited transfer across WM tasks.

    “Accounts that attribute training and transfer to plasticity in the undifferentiated neural substrate of WM (Klingberg, 2010; Westerberg & Klingberg, 2007) lack the specificity to accommodate limited transfer across WM tasks.”

    From Working memory training involves learning new skills (2019) · cites this paper as Westerberg & Klingberg, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Klingberg, Torkel
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
92
Issue
1-2
Pages
186-192
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141559543
Cited by
259
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory, working memory training, single-subject analysis, prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, brain activity changes, training-induced plasticity, transfer of training, reasoning tasks, skill acquisition, functional maps
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Reference Values, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review