Cited by 143Sleep and Work-Related FatigueRegulation of Appetite and ObesitySleep and Wakefulness Research

Acute sleep deprivation increases portion size and affects food choice in young men

Open access
Hogenkamp, Pleunie S., Nilsson, Emil, Nilsson, Victor C., Chapman, Colin D., Vogel, Heike, Lundberg, Lina S., Zarei, Sanaz, Cedernaes, Jonathan +6 more·2013·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Acute sleep loss increases food intake in adults. However, little is known about the influence of acute sleep loss on portion size choice, and whether this depends on both hunger state and the type of food (snack or meal item) offered to an individual. The aim of the current study was to compare portion size choice after a night of sleep and a period of nocturnal wakefulness (a condition experienced by night-shift workers, e.g. physicians and nurses). Sixteen men (age: 23 ± 0.9 years, BMI: 23.6 ± 0.6 kg/m(2)) participated in a randomized within-subject design with two conditions, 8-h of sleep and total sleep deprivation (TSD). In the morning following sleep interventions, portion size, comprising meal and snack items, was measured using a computer-based task, in both fasted and sated state. In addition, hunger as well as plasma levels of ghrelin were measured. In the morning after TSD, subjects had increased plasma ghrelin levels (13%, p=0.04), and chose larger portions (14%, p=0.02), irrespective of the type of food, as compared to the sleep condition. Self-reported hunger was also enhanced (p<0.01). Following breakfast, sleep-deprived subjects chose larger portions of snacks (16%, p=0.02), whereas the selection of meal items did not differ between the sleep interventions (6%, p=0.13). Our results suggest that overeating in the morning after sleep loss is driven by both homeostatic and hedonic factors. Further, they show that portion size choice after sleep loss depend on both an individual's hunger status, and the type of food offered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.01.012

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute sleep loss increases food intake and ideal portion sizes.

    “Acute sleep loss increases food intake and ideal portion sizes (Hogenkamp et al., 2013;St-Onge et al., 2011), accentuates the brain's hedonic response to food (Benedict et al., 2012), and relatedly, impairs the ability to cognitively inhibit pre-potent responses to rewarding food stimuli (Cedernaes et al., 2014; topics reviewed in Cedernaes et al., 2015a).”
  • A randomized crossover study of 16 healthy normal-weight men resulted in an increase in hunger ratings parallel to an increase in morning plasma ghrelin levels (+13%, p=0.04) after one night of total sleep deprivation when compared to 8 hours in bed sleep opportunity.

    “A randomized crossover study of 16 healthy normal-weight men resulted in an increase in hunger ratings parallel to an increase in morning plasma ghrelin levels (+13%, p=0.04) after one night of TSD when compared to 8 hours in bed sleep opportunity [59].”
  • After one night of total sleep deprivation, 16 healthy normal-weight men chose larger food portions (+14%, p=0.02) in correspondence with increased hunger status; portions of snacks consumed after breakfast also increased (+16%, p=0.02).

    “After one night of TSD, 16 healthy normal-weight men choose larger food portions (+14%, p=0.02) in correspondence with increased hunger status [59]. The portions of snacks consumed after breakfast also increased (+16%, p=0.02).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogenkamp, P. S., Nilsson, E., Nilsson, V. C., Chapman, C. D., Vogel, H., Lundberg, L. S., Zarei, S., Cedernaes, J., Rångtell, F. H., Broman, J.-E., Dickson, S. L., Brunstrom, J. M., Benedict, C., & Schiöth, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Hogenkamp, Pleunie S.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1668-1674
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972147236
Cited by
143
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6
FWCI
19.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB654, project B7)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF13OC0005539, NNF12OC1016479)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
acute sleep deprivation, portion size, food choice, hunger, ghrelin, nocturnal wakefulness, night shift workers, overeating, snacks, young men
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Appetite, Fasting, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Homeostasis, Humans, Hunger, Male, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Ghrelin, Young Adult, Pleasure, Self Report, Meals, Snacks, Portion Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review