Cited by 116Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Oxytocin administration enhances controlled social cognition in patients with schizophrenia

Open access
Woolley, J.D., Chuang, B., Lam, O., Lai, W., O’Donovan, A., Rankin, K.P., Mathalon, D.H., Vinogradov, S.·2014·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Background Individuals with schizophrenia have functionally significant deficits in automatic and controlled social cognition, but no currently available pharmacologic treatments reduce these deficits. The neuropeptide oxytocin has multiple prosocial effects when administered intranasally in humans and there is growing interest in its therapeutic potential in schizophrenia.Methods We administered 40 IU of oxytocin and saline placebo intranasally to 29 male subjects with schizophrenia and 31 age-matched, healthy controls in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Social cognition was assessed with The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We examined the effects of oxytocin administration on automatic social cognition (the ability to rapidly interpret and understand emotional cues from the voice, face, and body); controlled social cognition (the ability to comprehend indirectly expressed emotions, thoughts, and intentions through complex deliberations over longer time periods); and a control task (the ability to comprehend truthful dialog and perform general task procedures) in individuals with and without schizophrenia using mixed factorial analysis of variance models.Results Patients with schizophrenia showed significant impairments in automatic and controlled social cognition compared to healthy controls, and administration of oxytocin significantly improved their controlled, but not automatic, social cognition, F(1, 58)=8.75; p=0.004. Conversely, oxytocin administration had limited effects on social cognition in healthy participants. Patients and controls performed equally well and there were no effects of oxytocin administration on the control task.Discussion Intact social cognitive abilities are associated with better functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. Our data highlight the potentially complex effects of oxytocin on some but not all aspects of social cognition, and support the exploration of intranasal oxytocin as a potential adjunct treatment to improve controlled social cognition in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.024

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent trials found no effect of intranasal oxytocin in schizophrenia patients or healthy volunteers.

    “They show no effect of intranasal oxytocin on patients with schizophrenia or healthy volunteers (102,103)”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Abstract Results report that intranasal oxytocin significantly improved controlled social cognition in patients with schizophrenia, contrary to the claimed lack of effect. The Discussion (§4.3) also reports improved performance on difficult RMET items in healthy participants, although effects on other aspects of their social cognition were limited. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woolley, J. D., Chuang, B., Lam, O., Lai, W., O’Donovan, A., Rankin, K. P., Mathalon, D. H., & Vinogradov, S.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Woolley, J.D.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
47
Pages
116-125
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171996691
Cited by
116
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 21
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-02-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 CX000758)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Northern California Institute for Research and Education
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH068725)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, schizophrenia, social cognition, intranasal administration, emotional understanding, social inference, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, adjunct treatment
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Awareness, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxytocin, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review