Cited by 156Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistrySynthesis and properties of polymers

Occurrence survey and spatial distribution of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl surfactants in groundwater, surface water, and sediments from tropical environments

Munoz, Gabriel, Labadie, Pierre, Botta, Fabrizio, Lestremau, François, Lopez, Benjamin, Geneste, Emmanuel, Pardon, Patrick, Dévier, Marie-Hélène +1 more·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The occurrence and spatial distribution of 22 selected perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in surface water (n=75), groundwater (n=80) and surficial sediment (n=15) were investigated for the first time in the tropical areas constituted by the French Overseas Territories (French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte and Reunion). Descriptive statistics and correlations between PFASs were evaluated through the use of specific statistical treatments to handle left-censored data ("non-detects"). PFASs were ubiquitous in these samples and detection frequencies as high as 79% for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and 65% for perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) were reported in surface waters. ∑PFASs was in the range<LOD-77ngL-1 (median=1.8ngL-1) in surface waters and <LOD-638ngL-1 (median=0.56ngL-1) in groundwater. PFOS and PFOA dominated PFAS composition profiles in surface water, while shorter-chain compounds prevailed in groundwater, highlighting their higher transfer potential through infiltration processes and the possible influence of precursors. Elevated levels of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTSA) and short-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylates were found in groundwater near several industrial facilities such as oil refineries or electricity power plants. This may be related to the existence of firefighting operations involving the use of aqueous film forming foams (AFFFs) that contain precursors to such compounds. These findings would also tend to confirm recent trends regarding the increasing proportion of C 4- or C 6-based perfluoroalkyl acids, their precursors, or even shorter-chain congeners at PFAS hot spots.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.146

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among water bodies without acute contamination sources, PFAS are more common in surface water than groundwater.

    “Among water bodies without acute contamination sources, the PFAS content of surface water is much more extensively surveyed than that of groundwater, and PFAS are more common in surface water than groundwater (Munoz et al., 2017; Sims et al., 2022).”

    From PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns (2025) · cites this paper as Munoz et al., 2017

  • Munoz et al. (2017) first confirmed that PFAS were present in French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion, with concentrations significantly lower than those detected in metropolitan France.

    “This research was the first to confirm that PFAS were present in these regions; however, concentrations were significantly lower than those detected in metropolitan France.”
  • PFAS were detected in groundwater close to several industrial sites, including oil refineries and electrical power plants, but the highest concentration of PFOS was detected in sediment and surface water samples.

    “PFAS were detected in groundwater close to several industrial sites, including oil refineries and electrical power plants, but the highest concentration of PFOS was detected in sediment and surface water samples.”
  • Most PFAS contamination in the tropical areas studied by Munoz et al. was attributed to firefighting training activities near the sites.

    “Most PFAS contamination was attributed to the firefighting training activities which took place near those sites (KEMI, 2015; Munoz et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munoz, G., Labadie, P., Botta, F., Lestremau, F., Lopez, B., Geneste, E., Pardon, P., Dévier, M.-H., & Budzinski, H.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques (FR)
Corresponding author
Budzinski, Hélène
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
607-608
Pages
243-252
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740915461
Cited by
156
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments
  • French National Research Agency
  • INTERREG ORQUE SUDOE (SOE3/P2/F591)
  • Aquitaine Region
  • European Union
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Synthesis and properties of polymers
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, spatial distribution, groundwater contamination, surface water contamination, surface sediments, tropical conditions, French overseas territories, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, fluorotelomer sulfonates, aqueous film-forming foam, industrial pollution, non-detects, left-censored data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review