CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do all roads lead to Oct4? The emerging concepts of induced pluripotency

Radzisheuskaya, Aliaksandra, Silva, José C.R.·2014·Trends in Cell Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.11.010PMC PMC3976965
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.11.010

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OCT4 is the master regulator of epigenetic reprogramming.

    “Multiple studies have suggested OCT4 (Fig. 1a) as the master regulator of epigenetic reprogramming [31][32][33] , as OCT4 overexpression alone is sufficient to induce pluripotency when other canonical reprogramming factors are endogenously expressed or are in the presence of other chromatin remodeling chemical factors 32,34,35 .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Concluding remarks call Oct4 an essential transcriptional regulator in reprogramming, and ‘Overcoming epigenetic barriers’ describes its role in opening repressed chromatin. But ‘Molecular mechanisms of Oct4 in reprogramming’ says its precise mechanism remains unclear, while the epigenetic-barrier section describes its possible role in overcoming a specific barrier. The paper does not establish Oct4 as the master regulator of epigenetic reprogramming. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • OSKM facilitates MET by suppressing the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through multiple mechanisms, such as OCT4 and MYC repression of TGFβ signaling, OCT4 and SOX2 activation of miR-200 family, and OCT4 and KLF4 chromatin opening and activation of epithelial genes.

    “Interestingly, OSKM facilitates MET by suppressing the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through multiple mechanisms, such as OCT4 and MYC repression of TGFβ signaling 33,94 , OCT4 and SOX2 activation of miR-200 family 33,98 , and OCT4 and KLF4 chromatin opening and activation of epithelial genes 37 .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Martin, 1981, Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 78, 7634, 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634 · DOI
  2. Smith, 2001, Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 17, 435, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.435 · DOI
  3. Nichols, 2009, Naive and primed pluripotent states, Cell Stem Cell, 4, 487, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015 · DOI
  4. Nichols, 2012, Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 4, a008128, 10.1101/cshperspect.a008128 · DOI
  5. Takahashi, 2006, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors, Cell, 126, 663, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nichols, 1998, Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4, Cell, 95, 379, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81769-9 · DOI
  7. Niwa, 2000, Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells, Nat. Genet., 24, 372, 10.1038/74199 · DOI
  8. Avilion, 2003, Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function, Genes Dev., 17, 126, 10.1101/gad.224503 · DOI
  9. Masui, 2007, Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 625, 10.1038/ncb1589 · DOI
  10. Chambers, 2007, Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development, Nature, 450, 1230, 10.1038/nature06403 · DOI
  11. Martello, 2012, Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal, Cell Stem Cell, 11, 491, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.008 · DOI
  12. Masui, 2008, Rex1/Zfp42 is dispensable for pluripotency in mouse ES cells, BMC Dev. Biol., 8, 45, 10.1186/1471-213X-8-45 · DOI
  13. Jiang, 2008, A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 10, 353, 10.1038/ncb1698 · DOI
  14. Ye, 2013, Embryonic stem cell self-renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1, EMBO J., 32, 2548, 10.1038/emboj.2013.175 · DOI
  15. Martello, 2013, Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor, EMBO J., 32, 2561, 10.1038/emboj.2013.177 · DOI
  16. Chambers, 2003, Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells, Cell, 113, 643, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00392-1 · DOI
  17. Festuccia, 2012, Esrrb is a direct Nanog target gene that can substitute for Nanog function in pluripotent cells, Cell Stem Cell, 11, 477, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.08.002 · DOI
  18. Hall, 2009, Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Kruppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal, Cell Stem Cell, 5, 597, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.003 · DOI
  19. Kopp, 2008, Small increases in the level of Sox2 trigger the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, Stem Cells, 26, 903, 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0951 · DOI
  20. Kim, 2009, Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells, Cell, 136, 411, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.023 · DOI
  21. Kim, 2009, Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4, Nature, 461, 649, 10.1038/nature08436 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wu, 2011, Reprogramming of trophoblast stem cells into pluripotent stem cells by Oct4, Stem Cells, 29, 755, 10.1002/stem.617 · DOI
  23. Tsai, 2011, Single transcription factor reprogramming of hair follicle dermal papilla cells to induced pluripotent stem cells, Stem Cells, 29, 964, 10.1002/stem.649 · DOI
  24. Yuan, 2011, Brief report: combined chemical treatment enables Oct4-induced reprogramming from mouse embryonic fibroblasts, Stem Cells, 29, 549, 10.1002/stem.594 · DOI
  25. Li, 2011, Generation of iPSCs from mouse fibroblasts with a single gene, Oct4, and small molecules, Cell Res., 21, 196, 10.1038/cr.2010.142 · DOI
  26. Zhu, 2010, Reprogramming of human primary somatic cells by OCT4 and chemical compounds, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 651, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Heng, 2010, The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells, Cell Stem Cell, 6, 167, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.009 · DOI
  28. Gu, 2005, Orphan nuclear receptor LRH-1 is required to maintain Oct4 expression at the epiblast stage of embryonic development, Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 3492, 10.1128/MCB.25.9.3492-3505.2005 · DOI
  29. Barnea, 2000, Synergy of SF1 and RAR in activation of Oct-3/4 promoter, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 6608, 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6608 · DOI
  30. Costa, 2013, NANOG-dependent function of TET1 and TET2 in establishment of pluripotency, Nature, 495, 370, 10.1038/nature11925 · DOI
  31. Buganim, 2012, Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase, Cell, 150, 1209, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mansour, 2012, The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming, Nature, 488, 409, 10.1038/nature11272 · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2006, Sall4 modulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency and early embryonic development by the transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 1114, 10.1038/ncb1481 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Gao, 2013, Reprogramming to pluripotency using designer TALE transcription factors targeting enhancers, Stem Cell Reports, 1, 183, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.06.002 · DOI
  35. Nakagawa, 2008, Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts, Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 101, 10.1038/nbt1374 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Niwa, 2002, Phenotypic complementation establishes requirements for specific POU domain and generic transactivation function of Oct-3/4 in embryonic stem cells, Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 1526, 10.1128/MCB.22.5.1526-1536.2002 · DOI
  37. Esch, 2013, A unique Oct4 interface is crucial for reprogramming to pluripotency, Nat. Cell Biol., 15, 295, 10.1038/ncb2680 · DOI
  38. Frankenberg, 2013, On the origin of POU5F1, BMC Biol., 11, 56, 10.1186/1741-7007-11-56 · DOI
  39. Frankenberg, 2010, The evolution of class V POU domain transcription factors in vertebrates and their characterisation in a marsupial, Dev. Biol., 337, 162, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.017 · DOI
  40. Tapia, 2012, Reprogramming to pluripotency is an ancient trait of vertebrate Oct4 and Pou2 proteins, Nat. Commun., 3, 1279, 10.1038/ncomms2229 · DOI
  41. Niwa, 2008, Platypus Pou5f1 reveals the first steps in the evolution of trophectoderm differentiation and pluripotency in mammals, Evol. Dev., 10, 671, 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00280.x · DOI
  42. Morrison, 2006, Conserved roles for Oct4 homologues in maintaining multipotency during early vertebrate development, Development, 133, 2011, 10.1242/dev.02362 · DOI
  43. Rossello, 2013, Mammalian genes induce partially reprogrammed pluripotent stem cells in non-mammalian vertebrate and invertebrate species, Elife, 2, e00036, 10.7554/eLife.00036 · DOI
  44. Lu, 2012, Avian-induced pluripotent stem cells derived using human reprogramming factors, Stem Cells Dev., 21, 394, 10.1089/scd.2011.0499 · DOI
  45. Esteban, 2012, The mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 22, 423, 10.1016/j.gde.2012.09.004 · DOI
  46. Ichida, 2009, A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog, Cell Stem Cell, 5, 491, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Maherali, 2009, Tgfbeta signal inhibition cooperates in the induction of iPSCs and replaces Sox2 and cMyc, Curr. Biol., 19, 1718, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.025 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Samavarchi-Tehrani, 2010, Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 64, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Li, 2010, A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 51, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Wang, 2013, Critical regulation of miR-200/ZEB2 pathway in Oct4/Sox2-induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and induced pluripotent stem cell generation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 2858, 10.1073/pnas.1212769110 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Redmer, 2011, E-cadherin is crucial for embryonic stem cell pluripotency and can replace OCT4 during somatic cell reprogramming, EMBO Rep., 12, 720, 10.1038/embor.2011.88 · DOI
  52. Ho, 2013, Stage-specific regulation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells by Wnt signaling and T cell factor proteins, Cell Rep., 3, 2113, 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.015 · DOI
  53. Livigni, 2013, A conserved Oct4/POUV-dependent network links adhesion and migration to progenitor maintenance, Curr. Biol., 23, 2233, 10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.048 · DOI
  54. Buganim, 2013, Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming, Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 427, 10.1038/nrg3473 · DOI
  55. Soufi, 2012, Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors’ initial engagement with the genome, Cell, 151, 994, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Papp, 2013, Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency, Cell, 152, 1324, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.043 · DOI · Paper page
  57. You, 2011, OCT4 establishes and maintains nucleosome-depleted regions that provide additional layers of epigenetic regulation of its target genes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 14497, 10.1073/pnas.1111309108 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Chen, 2013, H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs, Nat. Genet., 45, 34, 10.1038/ng.2491 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Loh, 2007, Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells, Genes Dev., 21, 2545, 10.1101/gad.1588207 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Shi, 2008, A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 2, 525, 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.011 · DOI
  61. Feldman, 2006, G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 188, 10.1038/ncb1353 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Athanasiadou, 2010, Targeting of de novo DNA methylation throughout the Oct-4 gene regulatory region in differentiating embryonic stem cells, PLoS ONE, 5, e9937, 10.1371/journal.pone.0009937 · DOI
  63. Loh, 2011, A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers, Cell Stem Cell, 8, 363, 10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Shu, 2013, Induction of pluripotency in mouse somatic cells with lineage specifiers, Cell, 153, 963, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.001 · DOI
  65. Montserrat, 2013, Reprogramming of human fibroblasts to pluripotency with lineage specifiers, Cell Stem Cell, 13, 341, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.019 · DOI
  66. Thomson, 2011, Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers, Cell, 145, 875, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.017 · DOI
  67. Wang, 2012, Distinct lineage specification roles for NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in human embryonic stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 10, 440, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.016 · DOI
  68. Takemoto, 2011, Tbx6-dependent Sox2 regulation determines neural or mesodermal fate in axial stem cells, Nature, 470, 394, 10.1038/nature09729 · DOI
  69. Silva, 2008, Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition, PLoS Biol., 6, e253, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060253 · DOI
  70. Eminli, 2008, Reprogramming of neural progenitor cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2 expression, Stem Cells, 26, 2467, 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0317 · DOI
  71. Yamaguchi, 2011, Sox2 expression effects on direct reprogramming efficiency as determined by alternative somatic cell fate, Stem Cell Res., 6, 177, 10.1016/j.scr.2010.09.004 · DOI
  72. Carey, 2011, Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 9, 588, 10.1016/j.stem.2011.11.003 · DOI
  73. Tiemann, 2011, Optimal reprogramming factor stoichiometry increases colony numbers and affects molecular characteristics of murine induced pluripotent stem cells, Cytometry A, 79, 426, 10.1002/cyto.a.21072 · DOI
  74. Nagamatsu, 2012, Optimal ratio of transcription factors for somatic cell reprogramming, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 36273, 10.1074/jbc.M112.380683 · DOI
  75. Radzisheuskaya, 2013, A defined Oct4 level governs cell state transitions of pluripotency entry and differentiation into all embryonic lineages, Nat. Cell Biol., 15, 579, 10.1038/ncb2742 · DOI
  76. Karwacki-Neisius, 2013, Reduced Oct4 expression directs a robust pluripotent state with distinct signaling activity and increased enhancer occupancy by Oct4 and Nanog, Cell Stem Cell, 12, 531, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.023 · DOI
  77. Finley, 1999, BMP-4 inhibits neural differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells, J. Neurobiol., 40, 271, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19990905)40:3<271::AID-NEU1>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  78. Ying, 2003, BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3, Cell, 115, 281, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00847-X · DOI
  79. Shimozaki, 2003, Involvement of Oct3/4 in the enhancement of neuronal differentiation of ES cells in neurogenesis-inducing cultures, Development, 130, 2505, 10.1242/dev.00476 · DOI
  80. Hammachi, 2012, Transcriptional activation by Oct4 is sufficient for the maintenance and induction of pluripotency, Cell Rep., 1, 99, 10.1016/j.celrep.2011.12.002 · DOI
  81. Cirillo, 2002, Opening of compacted chromatin by early developmental transcription factors HNF3 (FoxA) and GATA-4, Mol. Cell, 9, 279, 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00459-8 · DOI
  82. Yang, 2011, Geminin escapes degradation in G1 of mouse pluripotent cells and mediates the expression of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog, Curr. Biol., 21, 692, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.026 · DOI
  83. Theunissen, 2011, Nanog overcomes reprogramming barriers and induces pluripotency in minimal conditions, Curr. Biol., 21, 65, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.074 · DOI
  84. O’Malley, 2013, High-resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells, Nature, 499, 88, 10.1038/nature12243 · DOI
  85. Oka, 2013, Differential role for transcription factor Oct4 nucleocytoplasmic dynamics in somatic cell reprogramming and self-renewal of embryonic stem cells, J. Biol. Chem., 288, 15085, 10.1074/jbc.M112.448837 · DOI
  86. Plachta, 2011, Oct4 kinetics predict cell lineage patterning in the early mammalian embryo, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 117, 10.1038/ncb2154 · DOI
  87. Faunes, 2013, A membrane-associated beta-catenin/Oct4 complex correlates with ground-state pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells, Development, 140, 1171, 10.1242/dev.085654 · DOI
  88. Frum, 2013, Oct4 cell-autonomously promotes primitive endoderm development in the mouse blastocyst, Dev. Cell, 25, 610, 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.004 · DOI
  89. Aksoy, 2013, Oct4 switches partnering from Sox2 to Sox17 to reinterpret the enhancer code and specify endoderm, EMBO J., 32, 938, 10.1038/emboj.2013.31 · DOI
  90. Zeineddine, 2006, Oct-3/4 dose dependently regulates specification of embryonic stem cells toward a cardiac lineage and early heart development, Dev. Cell, 11, 535, 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.07.013 · DOI
  91. Teo, 2011, Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin, Genes Dev., 25, 238, 10.1101/gad.607311 · DOI
  92. Palmieri, 1994, Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation, Dev. Biol., 166, 259, 10.1006/dbio.1994.1312 · DOI
  93. Guo, 2010, Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst, Dev. Cell, 18, 675, 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.012 · DOI
  94. Downs, 2008, Systematic localization of Oct-3/4 to the gastrulating mouse conceptus suggests manifold roles in mammalian development, Dev. Dyn., 237, 464, 10.1002/dvdy.21438 · DOI
  95. Yeom, 1996, Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells, Development, 122, 881, 10.1242/dev.122.3.881 · DOI
  96. Deveale, 2013, Oct4 is required ∼e7.5 for proliferation in the primitive streak, PLoS Genet., 9, e1003957, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003957 · DOI
  97. Young, 2011, Control of the embryonic stem cell state, Cell, 144, 940, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.032 · DOI
  98. Whyte, 2013, Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes, Cell, 153, 307, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.035 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Whyte, 2012, Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation, Nature, 482, 221, 10.1038/nature10805 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Pardo, 2010, An expanded Oct4 interaction network: implications for stem cell biology, development, and disease, Cell Stem Cell, 6, 382, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Palmqvist, 2005, Correlation of murine embryonic stem cell gene expression profiles with functional measures of pluripotency, Stem Cells, 23, 663, 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0157 · DOI
  102. Glover, 2006, Meta-analysis of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cell gene expression kinetics reveals early change of a small gene set, PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e158, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020158 · DOI
  103. Kaji, 2006, The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 285, 10.1038/ncb1372 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Wang, 2009, The lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1) is required for maintenance of global DNA methylation, Nat. Genet., 41, 125, 10.1038/ng.268 · DOI
  105. Szabo, 2010, Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to multilineage blood progenitors, Nature, 468, 521, 10.1038/nature09591 · DOI
  106. Efe, 2011, Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 215, 10.1038/ncb2164 · DOI
  107. Kim, 2011, Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 7838, 10.1073/pnas.1103113108 · DOI
  108. Thier, 2012, Direct conversion of fibroblasts into stably expandable neural stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 10, 473, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Hou, 2013, Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds, Science, 341, 651, 10.1126/science.1239278 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Radzisheuskaya, A., & Silva, J. C. R.
Venue
Trends in Cell Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
275-284
ISSN
0962-8924
DOI
10.1016/j.tcb.2013.11.010
PMC
PMC3976965
Cited by
101
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review