CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consciousness: converging insights from connectionist modeling and neuroscience

Maia, Tiago V., Cleeremans, Axel·2005·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the past decade, many findings in cognitive neuroscience have resulted in the view that selective attention, working memory and cognitive control involve competition between widely distributed representations. This competition is biased by top-down projections (notably from prefrontal cortex), which can selectively enhance some representations over others. This view has now been implemented in several connectionist models. In this review, we emphasize the relevance of these models to understanding consciousness. Interestingly, the models we review have striking similarities to others directly aimed at implementing 'global workspace theory'. All of these models embody a fundamental principle that has been used in many connectionist models over the past twenty years: global constraint satisfaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.016

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Desimone, 1995, Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 18, 193, 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Miller, 2001, An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 24, 167, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  3. O'Reilly, 1999, A biologically based computational model of working memory, 375
  4. Frank, 2001, Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 1, 137, 10.3758/CABN.1.2.137 · DOI · Paper page
  5. O'Reilly, R.C. (2003) Making Working Memory Work: A Computational Model of Learning in the Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia. Technical Report (03-03), Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado at Boulder
  6. Deco, 2005, Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons, J. Neurophysiol., 10.1152/jn.01095.2004 · DOI
  7. Cohen, 1990, On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect, Psychol. Rev., 97, 332, 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332 · DOI
  8. Corchs, 2002, Large-scale neural model for visual attention: Integration of experimental single-cell and fMRI data, Cereb. Cortex, 12, 339, 10.1093/cercor/12.4.339 · DOI
  9. Spratling, 2004, A feedback model of visual attention, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 219, 10.1162/089892904322984526 · DOI
  10. Rumelhart, 1986, Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models, Vol. 2, 7
  11. Cleeremans, A. Computational correlates of consciousness. Prog. Brain Res. (in press)
  12. Velmans, 1991, Is human information processing conscious?, Behav. Brain Sci., 14, 651, 10.1017/S0140525X00071776 · DOI
  13. Cleeremans, A. Being Virtual, Oxford University Press (in press)
  14. Libet, 1964, Production of threshold levels of conscious sensation by electrical stimulation of human somatosensory cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 27, 546, 10.1152/jn.1964.27.4.546 · DOI
  15. Merikle, 2001, Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology, Cognition, 79, 115, 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00126-8 · DOI
  16. Moutoussis, 2002, The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 9527, 10.1073/pnas.142305699 · DOI
  17. O'Brien, 1999, A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience, Behav. Brain Sci., 22, 127, 10.1017/S0140525X9900179X · DOI
  18. Dehaene, 1998, A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 14529, 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dehaene, 2003, A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 8520, 10.1073/pnas.1332574100 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Atallah, 2004, Hippocampus, cortex, and basal ganglia: insights from computational models of complementary learning systems, Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 82, 253, 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.004 · DOI
  21. Lamme, 2004, Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness, Neural Netw., 17, 861, 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.02.005 · DOI
  22. Schneider, 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention, Psychol. Rev., 84, 1, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Shiffrin, 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automaticity, attending and a general theory, Psychol. Rev., 84, 127, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Baars, 2003, Brain, conscious experience and the observing self, Trends Neurosci., 26, 671, 10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Faraone, 1998, Neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Biol. Psychiatry, 44, 951, 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00240-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tononi, 1998, Consciousness and complexity, Science, 282, 1846, 10.1126/science.282.5395.1846 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pascual-Leone, 2001, Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness, Science, 292, 510, 10.1126/science.1057099 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Tononi, 2000, Schizophrenia and the mechanisms of conscious integration, Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev., 31, 391, 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00056-9 · DOI
  29. McClelland, 1981, An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings, Psychol. Rev., 88, 375, 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mathis, W.D. and Mozer, M.C. (1996) Conscious and unconscious perception: A computational theory. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 324–328, Erlbaum
  31. Perruchet, 2002, The self-organizing consciousness, Behav. Brain Sci., 25, 297, 10.1017/S0140525X02000067 · DOI
  32. Treisman, 1996, The binding problem, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 6, 171, 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5 · DOI
  33. Crick, 1990, Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness, Semin. Neurosci., 2, 263
  34. Engel, 2001, Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness, Trends Cogn. Sci., 5, 16, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01568-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Shadlen, M.N. and Movshon, J.A. (1999) Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24, 67–77, 111-125 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hummel, 1992, Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition, Psychol. Rev., 99, 480, 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480 · DOI
  37. Hopfield, 2001, What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 1282, 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1282 · DOI
  38. Niebur, 1994, A model for the neuronal implementation of selective visual attention based on temporal correlation among neurons, J. Comput. Neurosci., 1, 141, 10.1007/BF00962722 · DOI
  39. Shastri, 1996, Temporal synchrony, dynamic bindings, and SHRUTI: a representational but non-classical model of reflexive reasoning, Behav. Brain Sci., 19, 331, 10.1017/S0140525X00042965 · DOI
  40. von der Malsburg, 1986, A neural cocktail-party processor, Biol. Cybern., 54, 29, 10.1007/BF00337113 · DOI
  41. Fries, 2002, Oscillatory neuronal synchronization in primary visual cortex as a correlate of stimulus selection, J. Neurosci., 22, 3739, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03739.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lumer, 1997, Neural dynamics in a model of the thalamocortical system. II. The role of neural synchrony tested through perturbations of spike timing, Cereb. Cortex, 7, 228, 10.1093/cercor/7.3.228 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Block, 1995, On a confusion about a function of consciousness, Behav. Brain Sci., 18, 227, 10.1017/S0140525X00038188 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Block, 2005, Two neural correlates of consciousness, Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, 46, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Tong, 2003, Primary visual cortex and visual awareness, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 4, 219, 10.1038/nrn1055 · DOI
  46. Braver, 1999, Dopamine, cognitive control, and schizophrenia: the gating model, Prog. Brain Res., 121, 327, 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63082-4 · DOI · Paper page
  47. O'Reilly, 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maia, T. V., & Cleeremans, A.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
397-404
ISSN
1364-6613
DOI
10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.016
Cited by
64
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review