Cited by 2,144Health disparities and outcomesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived social isolation and cognition

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Hawkley, Louise C.·2009·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Social species, from Drosophila melanogaster to Homo sapiens, fare poorly when isolated. Homo sapiens, an irrepressibly meaning-making species, are, in normal circumstances, dramatically affected by perceived social isolation. Research indicates that perceived social isolation (i.e. loneliness) is a risk factor for, and may contribute to, poorer overall cognitive performance, faster cognitive decline, poorer executive functioning, increased negativity and depressive cognition, heightened sensitivity to social threats, a confirmatory bias in social cognition that is self-protective and paradoxically self-defeating, heightened anthropomorphism and contagion that threatens social cohesion. These differences in attention and cognition impact on emotions, decisions, behaviors and interpersonal interactions that can contribute to the association between loneliness and cognitive decline and between loneliness and morbidity more generally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Boomsma, 2005, Genetic and environmental contributions to loneliness in adults: The Netherlands Twin Register Study, Behav. Genet., 35, 745, 10.1007/s10519-005-6040-8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hawkey, 2006, Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressure, Psychol. Aging, 21, 152, 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.152 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hawkley, 2009, Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses, Health Psychol., 28, 354, 10.1037/a0014400 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Adam, 2006, Day-to-day dynamics of experience-cortisol associations in a population-based sample of older adults, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 17058, 10.1073/pnas.0605053103 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cacioppo, 2009, In the eye of the beholder: individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 21, 1, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21007 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,003

Metadata

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Cacioppo, John T.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
447-454
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131334268
Cited by
2,144
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 284 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 196 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 37
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 RG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG18911, P01AG018911, R01AG034052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
perceived social isolation, loneliness, cognitive decline, executive function, depressive cognitions, confirmation bias, anthropomorphism, social contagion, social cohesion, attention, morbidity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Social Isolation, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review