Cited by 165Mind wandering and attentionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Spontaneous Thought and Vulnerability to Mood Disorders: The Dark Side of the Wandering Mind

Open access
Marchetti, Igor, Koster, Ernst H. W., Klinger, Eric, Alloy, Lauren B.·2016·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

There is increasing interest in spontaneous thought, namely task-unrelated or rest-related mental activity. Spontaneous thought is an umbrella term for processes like mindwandering, involuntary autobiographical memory, and daydreaming, with evidence elucidating adaptive and maladaptive consequences. In this theoretical framework, we propose that, apart from its positive functions, spontaneous thought is a precursor for cognitive vulnerability in individuals who are at-risk for mood disorders. Importantly, spontaneous thought mostly focuses on unattained goals and evaluates the discrepancy between current and desired status (Klinger, 1971, 2013a). In individuals who stably (i.e., trait negative affectivity) or transitorily (i.e., stress) experience negative emotions in reaction to goal-discrepancy, spontaneous thought fosters major cognitive vulnerabilities (e.g., rumination, hopelessness, low self-esteem, and cognitive reactivity) which, in turn, enhance depression. Furthermore, we also highlight preliminary links between spontaneous thought and bipolar disorder. The evidence for this framework is reviewed and we discuss theoretical and clinical implications of our proposal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702615622383

Cites

177 of 178 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carver CS Scheier MF 1998 On the self-regulation New York, NY Cambridge University Press
  2. Clore GL Gasper K 2000 Feeling is Believing: Some Affective Influences on Belief Frijda NH Manstead ASR Bem S Emotions and beliefs: How do emotions influence beliefs? 10 44 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  3. Gray JA 1994 Three fundamental emotion systems Ekman P Davidson RJ The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions 234 247 New York, NY Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchetti, I., Koster, E. H. W., Klinger, E., & Alloy, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Minnesota Morris (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Marchetti, Igor
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2016-06-21
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
835-857
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2220121489
Cited by
165
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079369, R01MH102310, R01MH077908, R01MH101168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
spontaneous thought, involuntary autobiographical memories, daydreaming, cognitive vulnerability, mood disorders, depression, bipolar disorder, goal discrepancy, negative affectivity, stress, rumination, hopelessness, self-esteem, cognitive reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review