The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 54 of the 88 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Creative thinking is central to the arts, sciences, and everyday life. How does the brain produce creative thought? A series of recently published papers has begun to provide insight into this question, reporting a strikingly similar pattern of brain activity and connectivity across a range of creative tasks and domains, from divergent thinking to poetry composition to musical improvisation. This research suggests that creative thought involves dynamic interactions of large-scale brain systems, with the most compelling finding being that the default and executive control networks, which can show an antagonistic relation, tend to cooperate during creative cognition and artistic performance. These findings have implications for understanding how brain networks interact to support complex cognitive processes, particularly those involving goal-directed, self-generated thought.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that creative thinking emerges from dynamic interplay between default and executive control brain systems, especially when self-generated thought is guided by task goals. It synthesizes neuroimaging evidence from divergent thinking and artistic performance to propose that default regions generate candidate ideas while control regions evaluate and constrain them.
Key findings
- Across divergent thinking, poetry composition, musical improvisation, and visual art, studies report cooperation or coupling between default and control network regions, contrary to their usual antagonistic relationship.
- In a poetry composition study, ICA identified five hierarchical clusters, including default and control clusters; during spontaneous generation these clusters were negatively correlated, but their correlation increased during revision/evaluation.
- In musical improvisation, constraining pianists to specific pitch sets increased DLPFC coupling with motor-control regions, whereas expressing specific emotions increased DLPFC–default network connectivity.
- The proposed framework holds that the default network supplies candidate ideas from memory and self-generated thought, while the control network monitors, selects, inhibits, and modifies ideas to meet goals; coupling may weaken when goals are vague or top-down constraints are relaxed.
Methods
- Narrative review and integrative framework, not a primary empirical study.
- Draws on recent fMRI and functional connectivity studies of domain-general creativity (e.g., alternate uses divergent thinking) and domain-specific artistic performance (music, poetry, visual art).
- Synthesizes findings from cited experiments using seed-based, dynamic functional connectivity, ICA, and univariate analyses to support a default–control interaction model.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors explicitly exclude research on creative insight and refer readers elsewhere; no formal limitations section is provided.
- Evident from the text: it is a selective narrative synthesis rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, with no new data or quantitative pooling.
- Evident: conclusions rest on a limited set of cited neuroimaging studies across different tasks and domains, and the authors note default–control coupling is not ubiquitous, so boundary conditions remain to be clarified.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
21 Own interpretation · 15 Partly supported · 13 No full text of the sources · 11 Supported · 9 Supported so far · 1 Sources not found · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although self-generated thoughts can occur spontaneously in mind, they also have been shown to benefit from goal-directed processing and cognitive control [5].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Creativity, Cognitive Control, and Self-Generated Thought
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes self-generated thoughts as sometimes purposeful and related to personal goals, even though they can also arise without intent. The section on default and frontoparietal control network interactions says that some forms depend on executive resources, while the content regulation section links adaptive regulation to their benefits. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Such processes typically involve the top-down modulation of self-generated information [5].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] source
In “Default and frontoparietal control network interactions” (page not provided), the paper says that goals served by the default network depend on top-down regulatory processes. It also describes default–control network cooperation as maintaining or evaluating self-generated information in the service of a goal. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Importantly, the default and control networks have also shown cooperation during several cognitive processes [8, 17–21].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [8] source
The Results report recruitment of both default and executive network regions during mind wandering. The Discussion describes similar parallel recruitment during creative thinking and naturalistic film viewing, supporting the broader statement that the networks can cooperate during several cognitive processes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Could not verifycites [17] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports activation of cognitive-control regions during reappraisal, but does not assess cooperation between default and control networks. Searches for “default mode” and “cooperation between default and control networks” found no passage addressing that relationship across cognitive processes. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] source
- Supportedcites [19] source
The Discussion reports coupling between default-network and executive regions during goal-directed mental simulation. It also describes parallel activity in creative thinking, mind wandering, and autobiographical planning, supporting the broader statement about cooperation across several cognitive processes. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [20] source
The Introduction reports coactivation and coupling of default and executive regions during internally directed, goal-directed cognition. The Discussion describes interactions during the paper’s working-memory task and reports increased connectivity or activation in transitive reasoning and social working-memory tasks. Together, these passages support the broad claim that the networks cooperate across several cognitive processes. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [21] source
The Discussion reports cooperation between the default mode network (DMN) and frontoparietal network (FPN) during a working-memory task. It also describes a similar pattern of network activity across future planning, creative thought, decisions about future rewards, and social memory, supporting the broader claim about several cognitive processes. No page number is supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We suspect that memory systems may play a key role in the generation of candidate ideas across domain-general and domain-specific contexts (cf. [52]).”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [52] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction links memory search and retrieval to generating unusual associations and a larger pool of novel ideas. The Discussion proposes that semantic-memory structure constrains search in the Remote Associates Test. These passages support a role for memory in generating candidate ideas, but they do not establish that role across both domain-general and domain-specific contexts. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Moreover, a study of healthy young and older adults reported that performance on the alternate uses task was positively correlated with the number of episodic details that participants reported when they imagined future personal experiences [71].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [71] source
The Results ("Relation between Divergent Thinking and Episodic Simulation"; page unavailable) report that all five divergent-thinking measures correlated significantly with internal episodic details in imagined future events. The Methods identify the measure as the Alternative Uses Task, and the study included young and older adults. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, a functional connectivity analysis revealed increased coupling of default and control network regions during idea evaluation, consistent with the poetry composition study described above [34].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] source
- Supportedcites [34] source
The Results (Functional Connectivity during Generation and Revision Phases; page not available) report that anticorrelation between MPFC- and DLPFC/IPS-centered clusters during poetry generation was markedly attenuated during revision. The Discussion describes revision as potentially involving evaluation. The citation supports the stated consistency with the poetry study; it is not offered as the source of the visual-artists finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Recent research points to an important role of the default network and episodic memory in creative cognition ([50–51]; see Box 1).”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [50] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (‘The generation of new vs. old ideas’; page unavailable) proposes that episodic-memory recall may be crucial for generating novel ideas. The Discussion (‘Divergent thinking effects’; page unavailable) reports deactivation of default-mode-network regions during divergent thinking, but interprets it as possibly reflecting general goal-directed processing, not an important creative role for the network. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Supportedcites [51] source
In the Discussion’s ‘Neural correlates of metaphor production’ section (page not supplied), the authors report activation of regions associated with the default mode network during metaphor production and link the PCC to episodic memory retrieval. They also describe creative ideas as recombinations of memory elements, supporting the citing sentence’s broad, hedged claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Whole-brain functional connectivity analysis was used to identify a network of brain regions associated with divergent thinking, which included several regions of the default, control, and salience networks (see Figure 1A).”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Domain-General Creative Cognition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] source
The Present Research section states that participants performed an alternate-uses divergent thinking task during fMRI and that whole-brain connectivity was analyzed. The Discussion states that this analysis identified a distributed network containing default, executive (control), and salience network regions. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The default network has shown robust activation when people imagine future experiences [14, 22–23].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [22] source
- Supportedcites [23] source
The “Neural and cognitive similarities” section reports activation in brain regions that substantially overlap with the default network when people imagine the future. It also explicitly describes studies showing default-network activity during future imagination; the copy does not provide a page number. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, the default and control networks show cooperation during autobiographical future planning—constructing a detailed and sequential mental representation about a future goal state [10, 19, 24].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [10] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that the frontoparietal control network coupled with the default network during autobiographical planning. The Tasks section describes participants sequencing steps and obstacles into a personal plan for achieving a goal and rating the plan’s detail. These passages support both the network cooperation and the characterization of the planning task; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [19] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes planning for a future goal as integrating relevant information and envisioning a sequence of actions. The Discussion reports coactivity of default-network and cognitive-control regions during autobiographical planning, and relates that finding to the paper’s own goal-directed simulation results. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The default network consists of midline and posterior inferior parietal regions that show increased metabolic activity in the absence of most externally-presented cognitive tasks [12].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] source
The Discussion identifies medial prefrontal, posterior cingulate and precuneus regions as part of a default state when a person is not engaged in an attention-demanding task; it also identifies lateral parietal cortex as part of the system. The paper reports that these regions decrease in activity during cognitive tasks, consistent with greater activity in their absence. It does not use the precise label “posterior inferior parietal,” but the anatomical paraphrase does not change the central claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The control network consists of lateral prefrontal and anterior inferior parietal regions, and its activity is associated with cognitive processes that require externally-directed attention, including working memory, relational integration, and task-set switching [15].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [15] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ICA and Functional significance sections describe an executive-control network including lateral prefrontal and lateral parietal regions, associated with attention, working memory, and control. The Executive functioning section also describes switching between mental sets, but the copy does not identify the parietal region specifically as anterior inferior or link the network to relational integration. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Default network activity is associated with spontaneous and self-generated thought, including mind-wandering, mental simulation, social cognition, autobiographical retrieval, and episodic future thinking [5, 13–14].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] source
In “The default network plays an active role in self-generated cognition” (page not supplied), the paper links default-network activity to mind-wandering and spontaneous thought. The same section describes increased activity during autobiographical retrieval, imagining scenes, thinking about the future, and inferring others’ mental states, supporting the listed examples. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites [13] source
The “Internal mentation or external attention?” section links default-network activity to spontaneous thought and mind-wandering. The sections on the MTL subsystem, dMPFC subsystem, and aMPFC/PCC hubs describe its involvement in memory-based simulation, autobiographical recollection, future-event simulation, and social cognition. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“During working memory tasks, for example, the control network typically shows increased activation while the default network deactivates, presumably reflecting the suppression of task-unrelated thoughts during cognitive control [16].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [16] source
In “Functional relevance of DMN deactivation” (page unavailable), the review says visual working memory robustly activates a task-positive frontoparietal attention network whose activity is often anticorrelated with the DMN. The same section reports DMN suppression during working-memory tasks and presents disengagement from distracting thoughts such as mind-wandering as a hypothesis, consistent with the claim’s tentative wording. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This correlation with divergent thinking, however, was specific to imagined future events and was not observed for recalled or imagined past events.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [71] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Relation between Divergent Thinking and Episodic Simulation; page unavailable) report that all five Alternative Uses measures correlated significantly with episodic detail in imagined future events. But elaboration also correlated significantly with detail in imagined past events and showed a trend for recalled past events. The paper further reports no significant difference between the future and imagined-past relationships, so the claim of a future-specific correlation overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Our model builds on a seminal theory [28] that suggested that the default and control networks may contribute to idea generation and selection, respectively, by means of the evolutionary processes of blind variation and selective retention (cf. [30–31]).”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Default and Executive Control Network Dynamics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [28] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Creativity as blind variation and selective retention” (page unavailable), Jung links blind variation to generating ideas and selective retention to filtering them. In “What does it all mean?” (page unavailable), the paper proposes the default mode network as a setting for sequential BVSR, but it does not assign idea selection specifically to the cognitive control network. The claimed division of labor between the two networks is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] source
- Not matchedcites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Idea generation is often conceived as a bottom-up process associated with diffuse attention, whereas idea evaluation is thought to involve focused attention and cognitive control [28].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [28] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Creativity as blind variation and selective retention” (page unavailable), the paper describes generating many novel ideas and then filtering them for usefulness. “What does it all mean?” (page unavailable) links disinhibition to generating multiple ideas without refinement or selection. These passages support the generation–evaluation distinction, but do not characterize generation as bottom-up or explicitly link evaluation to focused attention and cognitive control. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the study of study of poetry composition [34], for example, poets were simply asked to spontaneously generate novel poetry—not to engage a generative strategy, as in the study of musical improvisation (e.g., [35])—so the top-down functions of the control network were not required.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [34] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Experimental Design; page not supplied) say participants were asked to spontaneously generate a novel poem, with no prescribed generative strategy. The Results (Brain Activations During Generation of New Poems in All Subjects; page not supplied) report decreased activity in DLPFC and IPS during generation, but decreased activity does not establish that top-down control was unnecessary. The Discussion (Expertise; page not supplied) also suggests novices may rely more on prefrontal control. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“It has previously been suggested that the default and control networks will cooperate to generate and maintain an “internal train of thought” [65] or during the extended evaluation of internal information [5].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] source
- Supportedcites [5] source
Citation [5] is attached to the extended evaluation of internal information, not the quoted “internal train of thought” attributed to [65]. In “Default and frontoparietal control network interactions” (page not provided), the paper says default and control networks can cooperate in tasks requiring the maintenance or extended evaluation of internal information. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Critically, administering the specificity induction increased the number of appropriate uses that participants generated on a subsequent alternate uses task, and also increased episodic details on a future simulation task [72].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [72] source
Experiment 1 Results report that the specificity induction increased appropriate uses on the alternate uses task. Experiment 1 Discussion reports that it also increased episodic details when participants imagined future events. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“But this negative correlation was markedly attenuated during idea evaluation, possibly due to increased task demands and top-down control required.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [34] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (Functional Connectivity; The Creative Process, pages unavailable) report that anticorrelation between the MPFC-associated and attention/control clusters was markedly attenuated during poetry revision, when top-down attention was reengaged. The paper describes idea evaluation as a component of revision, but it did not measure the correlation during a separate idea-evaluation condition or establish increased task demands as its cause. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Indeed, the authors reported increased activation of default regions during poetry generation, and a functional connectivity analysis revealed a negative correlation between default and control network regions during generation.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [34] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results sections on brain activations and functional connectivity report increased MPFC activity during poetry generation and a significant anticorrelation between MPFC-centered and DLPFC/IPS-centered clusters. But the broader claim that default regions increased activation overstates the findings: the activation results also report decreased activity in the precuneus, and the connectivity results group portions of the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex with DLPFC/IPS. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Self-generated thoughts arise from internally-focused mental activity that is largely independent of external input [4].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Creativity, Cognitive Control, and Self-Generated Thought
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [4] source
direct- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Borderline substantial claim. It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Creativity is a broadly defined construct, but it is generally assumed to involve the generation of some product that is both novel and useful [1–3].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Creativity, Cognitive Control, and Self-Generated Thought
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, we contend that the default network influences the generation of candidate ideas, but that the control network can constrain and direct this process to meet task-specific goals via top-down monitoring and executive control.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Default-control network coupling is not ubiquitous, however, as the networks have shown both cooperation and competition during creative thinking tasks.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the univariate level of analysis, idea generation was associated with widespread activity of default regions, whereas idea evaluation was associated with both default (e.g., MPFC and PCC) and control network activity (e.g., DLPFC and ACC).”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Generating semantically-distant verbs—responses that were remotely associated with nouns, assessed via Latent Semantic Analysis—was associated with activation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), a hub of the default network; moreover, as the semantic distance between the noun and verb increased, the MPFC showed greater coupling with the ventral ACC.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Domain-General Creative Cognition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Creativity researchers have long speculated that creative thought involves a two-stage process of idea generation and idea evaluation [49].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies suggest that generating new ideas in poetry and visual art may benefit from self-generated thoughts originating in the default network, but that such ideas may require top-down modulation during evaluation, thus reflected in default-control network coupling.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The control network may therefore maintain an “internal train of thought” by keeping the task goal activated, inhibiting aesthetically undesirable or goal-incongruent melodic sequences, and strategically searching memory for goal-congruent sequences.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this context, the default network may provide bottom-up evaluations via spontaneously-generated and self-referential mechanisms; the control network, in turn, may compare this information to the task goal and modify it via cognitive control mechanisms such as inhibition and selection.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors of this study suggest that idea evaluation may invoke a unique mode of analytic processing characterized by both deliberate (top-down) and spontaneous (bottom-up) forms of evaluative thought [27].”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Brain Networks and Creative Cognition: An Integrative Framework
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This emerging literature suggests that creative thought involves cooperation of the default and control networks—similar to other forms of goal-directed, self-generated thought—and that the extent of control network involvement may depend on the extent to which creative thought is constrained to meet specific task goals.”
§ Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics > Concluding Remarks
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Functional connectivity or coupling between brain regions indexes cooperation or interaction between the corresponding large-scale networks.
“A growing number of studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional connectivity analysis of fMRI data to assess dynamic interactions between large-scale brain systems, such as the default and executive control networks, during creative cognition and artistic performance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Performance on laboratory creative tasks such as divergent thinking, poetry composition, and musical improvisation reflects creative cognition in real-world domains.
“We consider neuroimaging evidence related to both domain-general (e.g., divergent thinking) and domain-specific (e.g., musical improvisation) creative thought.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, this overarching data pattern fits with emerging frameworks that emphasize the role of the core network and its flexible coupling with other networks in the service of goal-directed tasks that comprise multiple component processes, including divergent thinking”
From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Beaty et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 1×
“The default network comprises midline and posterior inferior parietal regions that show increased metabolic activity in the absence of most externally presented cognitive tasks [12].”
BackgroundThe Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Self-citationDissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426 · cited 1×
“The control network comprises lateral prefrontal and anterior inferior parietal regions, and its activity is associated with cognitive processes that require externally directed attention, including working memory, relational integration, and task-set switching [15].”
BackgroundThe standard definition of creativity
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 · Cited by 3,895 · cited 1×
“Creativity is a broadly defined construct, but it is generally assumed to involve the generation of some product that is both novel and useful [1–3].”
BackgroundRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 4×
“As noted above, a primary function of the default network is episodic memory retrieval [22].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBlind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes
Campbell, D. T. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040373 · Cited by 2,329 · cited 1×
“[30,31]).”
Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12360 · Cited by 2,102
Cognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht154 · Cited by 1,896
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900234106 · Cited by 1,769 · cited 1×
“The model is discussed in the context of research that has provided evidence for related default-control network interactions in studies of mind wandering [8,9], autobiographical planning [10,11], and other modes of self-generated thought [5].”
BackgroundCreative cognition: theory, research, and applications
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5870 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity
Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., Fink, A., Qiu, J., Kwapil, T. R., Kane, M. J., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713532115 · Cited by 835
“Nevertheless, the high-creative network showed stable prediction of creative ability across datasets, and the neuroanatomy of this network mirrors previous fMRI studies of creative cognition reporting functional interactions among default, executive, and salience networks (1), suggesting that it may be a more reliable…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationVuust, P., Heggli, O. A., Friston, K. J., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2022) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00578-5 · Cited by 473
“The few studies of musical improvisation from a whole-brain connectivity perspective point to a large repertoire of brain states involving functional brain connectivity among frontal and parietal regions within default, salience and executive brain networks 230,237,242,243 .”
Electroencephalograms during Mental Arithmetic Task Performance
Zyma, I. G., Тукаєв, С., Seleznov, I., Kiyono, K., Popov, A. O., Chernykh, M., & Shpenkov, O. (2019) · Data · doi:10.3390/data4010014 · Cited by 320
“Many theoretical and practical works have been published over the last decades about the relationships between cognitive phenomena and activity of brain structures [1], the “global workspace” theory of brain functioning during emotions and mental activity [2], dynamical properties of cortical areas and their coordinat…”
BackgroundHeller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2019) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.03.005 · Cited by 311
Beaty, R. E., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.013 · Cited by 300
“In a recent review of studies examining creative cognition and artistic performance, we reported a consistent pattern of functional network connectivity that was characterized by interactions between the Default Network (DN) and the Executive Control Network (ECN; [1]).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBenedek, M., & Fink, A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.002 · Cited by 331
Self-citationBenedek, M., Kenett, Y. N., Umdasch, K., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.1278034 · Cited by 251
Self-citationAssociative thinking at the core of creativity
Beaty, R. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.004 · Cited by 272
Self-citationBeaty, R. E., Christensen, A. P., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012 · Cited by 208
“DLPFC activation during creative task performance is thought to reflect the involvement of executive control processes (Beaty et al., 2016; Benedek et al., 2014a; Chen et al., 2015, 2017).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe Process Definition of Creativity
Green, A. E., Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., & Kaufman, J. C. (2023) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573 · Cited by 286
“The criterion of goal constraint is aligned with the evidence concerning FPCN and its connectivity with DMN during creative cognition (Beaty, Benedek, Silvia, & Schacter, 2016, Beaty, Cortes, Zeitlen, Weinberger, & Green, 2021).”
Self-citationAyahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking while decreasing conventional convergent thinking
Kuypers, K. P. C., Riba, J., de la Fuente Revenga, M., Barker, S., Theunissen, E. L., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2016) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-016-4377-8 · Cited by 201
“The thalamus feeds information into the SN which in turn coordinates the other mentioned networks (Beaty et al. 2016; Uddin 2015).”
BackgroundBeaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23065 · Cited by 196
Self-citationCooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair
Xue, H., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007 · Cited by 201
“Moreover, neuroscience studies in the field of creativity have revealed that the PFC and rTPJ play pivotal roles in cognitive processing during creative-tasks (Beaty et al., 2016; Benedek et al., 2014; Goel et al., 2015; Kleibeuker et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2015).”
Boot, N. C., Baas, M., van Gaal, S., Cools, R., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.007 · Cited by 198
“Recent advances in neurobiology and (cognitive) neuroscience converge on several candidate regions and networks in the human brain that seem to be involved in creative cognition, including prefrontal, parietal, and temporal circuitries, and the striatum (e.g., Abraham et al., 2012; Beaty et al., 2016; Mayseless et al.…”
Exploring the Link Between Mind Wandering, Mindfulness, and Creativity: A Multidimensional Approach
Agnoli, S., Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2018) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1411423 · Cited by 208
“Creative thinking is indeed characterized by a complex process involving both implicit associative processes and explicit control processes (Beaty, Benedek, Silvia, & Schachter, 2016), and MW might inversely influence these different processes.”
“Forward flow”: A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity.
Gray, K. J., Anderson, S., Chen, E. E., Kelly, J., Christian, M. S., Patrick, J., Huang, L., Kenett, Y. N., & Lewis, K. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000391 · Cited by 189
“Creativity is predicted by expertise (Baer & Kaufman, 2005), personality (Kaufman et al., 2016), attentional control (Beaty, Benedek, Silvia, & Schacter, 2016), one’s social network (Perry-Smith & Shalley, 2003), and the broader cultural milieu (Rudowicz, 2003).”
BackgroundThe role of memory in creative ideation
Benedek, M., Beaty, R. E., Schacter, D. L., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00158-z · Cited by 202
Self-citationBrain mechanisms associated with internally directed attention and self-generated thought
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Beaty, R. E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22959 · Cited by 175
Self-citationBeaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Christensen, A. P., Qiu, J., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23884 · Cited by 184
“…findings indicate that the imaginative personality is associated with default and cognitive control network cooperation, consistent with the growing literature on brain dynamics supporting imagination and creativity (Beaty et al., 2016a; Christoff et al., 2016; Zabelina & Andrews-Hanna, 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationKleinmintz, O. M., Ivancovsky, T., & Shamay‐Tsoory, S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.004 · Cited by 176
Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword
Amer, T., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002 · Cited by 206
“In addition, neuroimaging evidence [65,66] demonstrates that the generation of creative ideas is associated with activation of the default mode network (a network of brain regions involved in internally based cognition that is typically deactivated during externally oriented tasks [67]) and interaction with the execut…”
BackgroundPredictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder
O’Callaghan, C., Kveraga, K., Shine, J. M., Adams, R. B., & Bar, M. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.003 · Cited by 175
Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control
Chrysikou, E. G. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.014 · Cited by 176
Smallwood, J., Karapanagiotidis, T., Ruby, F., Medea, B., de Caso, I., Konishi, M., Wang, H.-T., Hallam, G., Margulies, D. S., & Jefferies, E. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152272 · Cited by 165
A systematic framework of creative metacognition
Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.002 · Cited by 187
Self-citationThe Link Between Creativity, Cognition, and Creative Drives and Underlying Neural Mechanisms
Khalil, R., Godde, B., & Karim, A. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2019.00018 · Cited by 183
Kenett, Y. N., Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2016) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000056 · Cited by 150
“The top-down account of creativity proposes that creative thought is a top-down process that taps individual differences in the ability to control attention and cognition (Beaty et al., 2016, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking
Madore, K. P., Thakral, P. P., Beaty, R. E., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx312 · Cited by 137
“Studies of between-network functional connectivity (for review, see Beaty et al. 2016) using multivariate independent components analysis (ICA) and univariate region of interest (ROI) approaches have also suggested that components of the core network and frontoparietal cognitive control and dorsal…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationCooperation Makes a Group be More Creative
Lu, K., Xue, H., Nozawa, T., & Hao, N. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy215 · Cited by 147
Dynamics of aesthetic experience are reflected in the default-mode network
Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., Brielmann, A. A., Isik, A. I., Chatterjee, A. K., Leder, H., Pelli, D. G., & Starr, G. G. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.017 · Cited by 145
Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0605-z · Cited by 151
Self-citationSun, J., Liu, Z., Rolls, E. T., Chen, Q., Yao, Y., Yang, W., Wei, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Feng, J., et al. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy010 · Cited by 138
Spontaneous and deliberate creative cognition during and after psilocybin exposure
Mason, N. L., Kuypers, K. P. C., Reckweg, J. T., Müller, F., Tse, D. H. Y., Rios, B. D., Toennes, S. W., Stiers, P. L. J., Feilding, A., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01335-5 · Cited by 144
Semantic search during divergent thinking
Hass, R. W. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039 · Cited by 132
Updating the dynamic framework of thought: Creativity and psychedelics
Girn, M., Mills, C., Roseman, L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116726 · Cited by 135
Hass, R. W. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0659-y · Cited by 135
Chain free association, creativity, and the default mode network
Marron, T. R., Lerner, Y., Berant, E., Kinreich, S., Shapira‐Lichter, I., Hendler, T., & Faust, M. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.018 · Cited by 137
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682 · Cited by 172
Assessment of creativity evaluation skills: A psychometric investigation in prospective teachers
Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.007 · Cited by 125
Self-citationBunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 · Cited by 127
Sun, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Li, H., Wei, D., Yang, W., & Qiu, J. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23246 · Cited by 122
“The DMN and the CCN likely correspond to the blind variation and the selective retention components of creative thinking, respectively [Campbell, 1960; Simonton, 1984].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDriving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis
Kenett, Y. N., Medaglia, J. D., Beaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Betzel, R. F., Thompson‐Schill, S. L., & Qiu, J. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.001 · Cited by 128
“, 2016; Jung and Haier, 2007) and creativity (Beaty et al., 2016; Chrysikou, 2018; Chrysikou et al., 2014).”
InfluentialSelf-citationKrieger-Redwood, K., Jefferies, E., Karapanagiotidis, T., Seymour, R., Nunes, A., Ang, J. W. A., Majernikova, V., Mollo, G., & Smallwood, J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.060 · Cited by 106
Williams, K. J. H., Lee, E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Johnson, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.005 · Cited by 133
Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity
Zabelina, D. L., Friedman, N. P., & Andrews‐Hanna, J. R. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005 · Cited by 128
Parsing Heterogeneity in the Brain Connectivity of Depressed and Healthy Adults During Positive Mood
Price, R. B., Lane, S., Gates, K., Kraynak, T. E., Horner, M. S., Thase, M. E., & Siegle, G. J. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023 · Cited by 106
Mind-wandering as creative thinking: neural, psychological, and theoretical considerations
Fox, K. C. R., & Beaty, R. E. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.10.009 · Cited by 129
Self-citationBrain hemispheric involvement in visuospatial and verbal divergent thinking
Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., Cui, Z., Sun, J., He, H. G., Zhuang, K., Ren, Z., Liu, G., & Qiu, J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116065 · Cited by 113
Self-citationShi, L., Sun, J., Xia, Y., Ren, Z., Chen, Q., Wei, D., Yang, W., & Qiu, J. (2018) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.03.005 · Cited by 111
Common and distinct brain networks underlying verbal and visual creativity
Zhu, W., Chen, Q., Xia, L., Beaty, R. E., Yang, W., Tian, F., Sun, J., Cao, G., Zhang, Q., Chen, X., et al. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23507 · Cited by 108
“Together, these results suggest that brain regions linked to cognitive control play a central role in creative cognition by inhibiting unoriginal ideas and selecting useful and original ideas [Beaty et al., 2014a, 2015, 2016; Jung et al., 2013].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBenedek, M., Schües, T., Beaty, R. E., Jauk, E., Koschutnig, K., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.024 · Cited by 109
Self-citationTwo critical brain networks for generation and combination of remote associations
Bendetowicz, D., Urbanski, M., Garcin, B., Foulon, C., Lévy, R., Bréchemier, M.-L., Rosso, C., de Schotten, M. T., & Volle, E. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx294 · Cited by 112
Brain connectivity–based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure
Ovando‐Tellez, M., Kenett, Y. N., Benedek, M., Bernard, M., Belo, J., Béranger, B., Bieth, T., & Volle, E. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl4294 · Cited by 110
“Previous studies exploring the cognitive processes involved in creativity have revealed brain regions and functional networks associated with different creativity tasks (30, 32).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015 · Cited by 104
Brain Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Flexibility Across the Lifespan
Kupis, L. B., Goodman, Z. T., Kornfeld, S., Hoang, S., Romero, C., Dirks, B., Dehoney, J., Chang, C., Spreng, R. N., Nomi, J. S., et al. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab156 · Cited by 107
Volle, E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316556238.020 · Cited by 118
Sleep onset is a creative sweet spot
Lacaux, C., Andrillon, T., Bastoul, C., Idir, Y., Fonteix-Galet, A., Arnulf, I., & Oudiette, D. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj5866 · Cited by 95
“Creative cognition is supposed to rely on a dynamic interplay between brain networks involved in spontaneous thinking (default mode network) and cognitive control, which respectively support creative idea generation and evaluation (15).”
Dietrich, A. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1517-7 · Cited by 138
“…thinking, etc.), or neuroanatomy (right brains, prefrontal cortex, default mode network, network connectivity, etc.) (Baird et al., 2012; Beaty et al., 2016; Boden, 1998; Carson, Peterson, & Higgins, 2003; Chrysikou, 2018; DeBono, 1968; Dijksterhuis, 2006; Fink & Benedek, 2014; Jamison,…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWeinberger, A. B., Green, A. E., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00246 · Cited by 100
“…cognition—cognition manifesting in ideas that are both novel and useful (Barron, 1955; Runco and Jaeger, 2012)—comprises two primary processes: (1) idea generation; and (2) idea selection (Christoff et al., 2001; Smallwood, 2014; Beaty et al., 2016; Chrysikou, in press).”
BackgroundBeaty, R. E., Chen, Q., Christensen, A. P., Kenett, Y. N., Silvia, P. J., Benedek, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116499 · Cited by 108
Self-citationGreen, A. E., Katherine, S., Giangrande, E. J., Weinberger, A. B., Gallagher, N. M., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw080 · Cited by 100
“Promising brain-based accounts of creativity have emphasized connectivity between prefrontal executive cortical regions and the so-called default mode network of frontal and posterior midline regions (Jung et al. 2013; Beaty et al. 2016).”
BackgroundTobón, S., & Luna-Nemecio, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126591 · Cited by 95
Ovando‐Tellez, M., Benedek, M., Kenett, Y. N., Hills, T. T., Bouanane, S., Bernard, M., Belo, J., Bieth, T., & Volle, E. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03547-x · Cited by 100
Self-citationBrain networks underlying novel metaphor production
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., & Benedek, M. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004 · Cited by 91
“Both fields are beginning to challenge the notion that core brain networks like the DN and ECN always exhibit an antagonistic relationship (Beaty et al., 2016; Christoff et al., 2016; Zabelina & Andrews-Hanna, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRominger, C., Papousek, I., Perchtold‐Stefan, C. M., Benedek, M., Weiss, E. M., Schwerdtfeger, A. R., & Fink, A. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00699-y · Cited by 89
Self-citationBenedek, M., Jurisch, J., Koschutnig, K., Fink, A., & Beaty, R. E. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116586 · Cited by 98
“Moreover, generative constraints were further related to increased functional connectivity between a left executive control network and anterior default network, suggesting that coupling between these executive and default network regions plays a role in overcoming conceptual interference in creative thought (Beaty et…”
Self-citationDefault Mode and Executive Networks Areas: Association with the Serial Order in Divergent Thinking
Heinonen, J., Numminen, J., Hlushchuk, Y., Antell, H., Taatila, V. P., & Suomala, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162234 · Cited by 95
“Our findings corroborate previously proposed notion that creative/divergent thinking involves interactions of the default, salience, and executive networks [11,48,52,60,72].”
BackgroundResultAgnoli, S., Zanon, M., Mastria, S., Avenanti, A., & Corazza, G. E. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116385 · Cited by 90
Johnson, D. R., Kaufman, J. C., Baker, B. S., Patterson, J. D., Barbot, B., Green, A. E., van Hell, J. G., Kennedy, E., Sullivan, G., Taylor, C. L., et al. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01986-2 · Cited by 118
“Here, we focus on psychometric or “domain-general” creativity that can be captured by performance on verbal tasks. appropriateness and elaborated upon accordingly to meet specific creative goals (Beaty et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChen, Q., Beaty, R. E., & Qiu, J. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25025 · Cited by 97
“Moreover, an increasing number of studies also indicate that highly creative individuals showed stronger connectivity between this “evaluation network” (ECN) and a second network that supports idea generation (i.e., the DN; Beaty et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationAI as a co-creator and a design material: Transforming the design process
Yu, W. F. (2025) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2025.101303 · Cited by 94
Ren, J., Huang, F., Zhou, Y., Zhuang, L., Xu, J., Gao, C., Qin, S., & Luo, J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116751 · Cited by 89
Is the Mind a Network? Maps, Vehicles, and Skyhooks in Cognitive Network Science
Hills, T. T., & Kenett, Y. N. (2021) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12570 · Cited by 87
“…2016), introduce secondary tasks that interfere with control processing (Rosen & Engle, 1997), use neuroimaging to identify control processing (Beaty, Benedek, Silvia, & Schacter, 2016), and evaluate more nuanced differences in the behavior, such as reaction time data (Kenett et al., 2017;…”
Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2020) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination · doi:10.1017/9781108580298.008 · Cited by 91
Self-citationCore Network Contributions to Remembering the Past, Imagining the Future, and Thinking Creatively
Beaty, R. E., Thakral, P. P., Madore, K. P., Benedek, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01327 · Cited by 84
“Note also that our results bear on discussions of default network contributions to creative cognition (for discussion, see Beaty et al., 2016) since both hippocampus and MPFC are part of the default network.”
Self-citationA conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking
Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794 · Cited by 109
“The choice of this indicator variable is due to the fact that it connects with theories of creativity that postulate that creative ideas arise from the recovery of remote associations that are combined in novel and appropriate ways (Benedek et al., 2020; Mednick, 1962).”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural basis of functional fixedness during creative idea generation: An EEG study
Camarda, A., Salvia, É., Vidal, J., Weil, B., Poirel, N., Houdé, O., Borst, G., & Cassotti, M. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.009 · Cited by 93
“We hypothesized that if executive control and semantic processes are the two key mechanisms allowing one to generate ideas outside of the fixation effect, as predicted by recent models of creativity (Beaty et al., 2016; Cassotti et al., 2016), then we should observe a greater synchronization of the alpha power in fron…”
Spontaneous thought as an unconstrained memory process
Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2019) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.09.001 · Cited by 83
“daydreaming, creative thought [119,120], and dreaming.”
BackgroundCreativity assessment in neuroscience research.
Benedek, M., Christensen, A. P., Fink, A., & Beaty, R. E. (2019) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000215 · Cited by 93
“Or, the persistent relevance of the default network in creative cognition (Beaty et al., 2016; Zabelina & Andrews-Hanna, 2016) attracted much interest in the role of episodic memory for creative thought (e.”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeuroimaging predictors of creativity in healthy adults
Sunavsky, A., & Poppenk, J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116292 · Cited by 82
Neural correlates of serial order effect in verbal divergent thinking
Wang, M., Hao, N., Ku, Y., Grabner, R. H., & Fink, A. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.001 · Cited by 84
“In a recent review, Beaty and his colleagues (Beaty et al., 2016) proposed that the default network contribute to the generation of candidate ideas (potentially useful information derived from long-term memory) in light of its role in self-generated cognition, while the control network would often…”
Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: a state-of-the-art review
Palmiero, M., Fusi, G., Crepaldi, M., Borsa, V. M., & Rusconi, M. L. (2022) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4 · Cited by 90
Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., Wei, D., Yang, J., Sun, J., Liu, W., Yang, W., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, J. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw353 · Cited by 80
“The generation of novel and useful ideas is broadly considered to result from a set spontaneous and controlled cognitive processes that arise from the default mode network (DMN) and executive control network (ECN), respectively (Dietrich and Kanso 2010; Beaty et al. 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationBerkovich‐Ohana, A., Glicksohn, J., Ben‐Soussan, T. D., & Goldstein, A. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0649-y · Cited by 86
“In line with the networks approach to creativity, idea generation tasks are suggested to be related to default mode network (DMN) activation, while idea evaluation condition is related to a dynamic DMN—frontoparietal (FPN) cooperation (Beaty et al. 2016).”
BackgroundCreation Opportunities: Entrepreneurial Curiosity, Generative Cognition, and Knightian Uncertainty
Arikan, A. M., Arikan, I. T., & Koparan, I. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0252 · Cited by 85
The roles of sensory perceptions and mental imagery in consumer decision-making
Kim, M., Kim, J.-H., Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102517 · Cited by 97
Zhang, L., Qiao, L., Chen, Q., Yang, W., Xu, M., Yao, X., Qiu, J., & Yang, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01532 · Cited by 84
“A series of studies suggest that creative thought involves cooperation between idea generation and idea evaluation or cooperation between the default and the control networks (Dietrich and Kanso, 2010; Ellamil et al., 2012; Benedek et al., 2013; Beaty et al., 2014b, 2016).”
BackgroundGodwin, C. A., Hunter, M. A., Bezdek, M. A., Lieberman, G., Elkin-Frankston, S., Romero, V. L., Witkiewitz, K. A., Clark, V. P., & Schumacher, E. H. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.006 · Cited by 86
“Related to this, research indicates that regions of the default mode and executive networks couple in support of other cognitive processes including future planning and creative thought (Beaty et al., 2016; Spreng et al., 2010).”
BackgroundAdnan, A., Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2018) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.004 · Cited by 76
“Executive control networks, including the salience and frontoparietal networks, are subsequently engaged to evaluate these ideas in the latter stages of creative cognition (Beaty et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHigh transition frequencies of dynamic functional connectivity states in the creative brain
Li, J., Zhang, D., Liang, A., Liang, B., Wang, Z., Cai, Y., Gao, M., Gao, Z., Chang, S., Jiao, B., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46072 · Cited by 71
“…the DMN is highly associated with creativity through its contribution to the generation of candidate ideas or potentially valuable information 1,2,39 addition, a previous study 40 found that the dynamic spontaneous activities of the DMN was associated with the degree of mind-wandering, which…”
Creativity as a distinct trainable mental state: An EEG study of musical improvisation
Lopata, J. A., Nowicki, E. A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.020 · Cited by 77
“Since collected fMRI research shows that the degree to which tasks are goal-directed modulates frontal (de)activation (Beaty et al., 2016), future EEG research delineating several generative artistic performance tasks with varying degrees of high to low goal-direction is recommended.”
BackgroundInfluentialO’Callaghan, C., Walpola, I. C., & Shine, J. M. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0699 · Cited by 77
Use or Consequences: Probing the Cognitive Difference Between Two Measures of Divergent Thinking
Hass, R. W., & Beaty, R. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02327 · Cited by 72
Self-citationConnectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Creativity Anxiety
Ren, Z., Daker, R. J., Shi, L., Sun, J., Beaty, R. E., Wu, X., Chen, Q., Yang, W., Lyons, I. M., Green, A. E., et al. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117469 · Cited by 72
Self-citationSpontaneous and Controlled Processes in Creative Cognition
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190464745.013.22 · Cited by 82
Self-citationNeural and genetic determinants of creativity
Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Xie, X., Rolls, E. T., Sun, J., Zhang, K., Jiao, Z., Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Qiu, J., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.067 · Cited by 69
“The activation of the default mode network (DMN) in creative processes may reflect the spontaneous generation of candidate ideas, and/or the retrieval of long-term memory (Beaty et al., 2016), while the control network may serve to constrain cognition to meet specific goals of the tasks.”
BackgroundThe Costs and Benefits of Cognitive Control for Creativity
Chrysikou, E. G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316556238.018 · Cited by 81
Vartanian, O. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979839.010 · Cited by 92
Kenett, Y. N., Humphries, S. A., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2023) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2023.2165748 · Cited by 76
“…consistently reveals that the executive control network and the default network, two large-scale brain networks that typically act antagonistically actually increase functional coupling when a person is thinking creatively (Beaty et al., 2016, 2018, 2019; Benedek & Fink, 2019; Chrysikou, 2019).”
BackgroundInternally Directed Attention in Creative Cognition
Benedek, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316556238.011 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beaty, Roger E.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-95
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4724474
- OpenAlex
- W2148406463
- Cited by
- 1,105
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 34
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008441-30)
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG008441, R01AG08441)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060941)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- creative cognition, creative thinking, brain network dynamics, default mode network, frontoparietal network, divergent thinking, poetry composition, musical improvisation, self-generated thought, artistic performance
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Creativity, Humans, Neural Pathways, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
