Cited by 201Psychedelics and Drug StudiesCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Ayahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking while decreasing conventional convergent thinking

Open access
Kuypers, K. P. C., Riba, J., de la Fuente Revenga, M., Barker, S., Theunissen, E. L., Ramaekers, J. G.·2016·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ayahuasca is a South American psychotropic plant tea traditionally used in Amazonian shamanism. The tea contains the psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonist N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), plus β-carboline alkaloids with monoamine oxidase-inhibiting properties. Increasing evidence from anecdotal reports and open-label studies indicates that ayahuasca may have therapeutic effects in treatment of substance use disorders and depression. A recent study on the psychological effects of ayahuasca found that the tea reduces judgmental processing and inner reactivity, classic goals of mindfulness psychotherapy. Another psychological facet that could potentially be targeted by ayahuasca is creative divergent thinking. This mode of thinking can enhance and strengthen psychological flexibility by allowing individuals to generate new and effective cognitive, emotional, and behavioral strategies. The present study aimed to assess the potential effects of ayahuasca on creative thinking. METHODS: We visited two spiritual ayahuasca workshops and invited participants to conduct creativity tests before and during the acute effects of ayahuasca. In total, 26 participants consented. Creativity tests included the "pattern/line meanings test" (PLMT) and the "picture concept test" (PCT), both assessing divergent thinking and the latter also assessing convergent thinking. RESULTS: While no significant effects were found for the PLMT, ayahuasca intake significantly modified divergent and convergent thinking as measured by the PCT. While convergent thinking decreased after intake, divergent thinking increased. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that ayahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking. They suggest that ayahuasca increases psychological flexibility, which may facilitate psychotherapeutic interventions and support clinical trial initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-016-4377-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ayahuasca improves creativity.

    “improved creativity (Frecska et al., 2012; Kuypers et al., 2016)”

    From Psychological variables implied in the therapeutic effect of ayahuasca: A contextual approach (2018) · cites this paper as Kuypers et al., 2016

    The Discussion reports that ayahuasca enhanced creative divergent thinking during acute intoxication, but also decreased conventional convergent thinking. Thus, the unqualified claim of improved creativity overstates the mixed findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies described increases in divergent thinking during ayahuasca intake and visual creativity after ritual use of ayahuasca.

    “Previous studies described increases in divergent thinking during the ayahuasca intake (Kuypers 2016) and visual creativity after ritual use of ayahuasca (Frecska 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuypers, K. P. C., Riba, J., de la Fuente Revenga, M., Barker, S., Theunissen, E. L., & Ramaekers, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kuypers, K. P. C.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2016-07-19
Volume
233
Issue
18
Pages
3395-3403
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2492489237
Cited by
201
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
ayahuasca, divergent thinking, convergent thinking, creativity, N,N-dimethyltryptamine, 5-HT2A receptor agonists, psychological flexibility, psychedelic effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alkaloids, Carbolines, Cognition, Creativity, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, Plant Extracts, Psychotropic Drugs, Thinking, Banisteriopsis, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A, Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Agonists, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review