Cited by 242Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Creativity and Memory: Effects of an Episodic-Specificity Induction on Divergent Thinking

Open access
Madore, Kevin P., Addis, Donna Rose, Schacter, Daniel L.·2015·Psychological Science

Abstract

People produce more episodic details when imagining future events and solving means-end problems after receiving an episodic-specificity induction—brief training in recollecting details of a recent event—than after receiving a control induction not focused on episodic retrieval. Here we show for the first time that an episodic-specificity induction also enhances divergent creative thinking. In Experiment 1, participants exhibited a selective boost on a divergent-thinking task (generating unusual uses of common objects) after a specificity induction compared with a control induction; by contrast, performance following the two inductions was similar on an object association task thought to involve little divergent thinking. In Experiment 2, we replicated the specificity-induction effect on divergent thinking using a different control induction, and also found that participants performed similarly on a convergent-thinking task following the two inductions. These experiments provide novel evidence that episodic memory is involved in divergent creative thinking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797615591863

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With respect to divergent thinking, ESI increases the production of both old ideas from memory and new ideas from imagination generated for the first time during study.

    “With respect to divergent thinking, ESI increases the production of both old ideas from memory (e.g., novel uses of an object based on remembering a past experience involving that use) and new ideas from imagination generated for the first time during study”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Madore et al. 2015

    The General Discussion reports preliminary data suggesting that ESI may boost both “old” and “new” ideas. The citing sentence presents that tentative finding as an established increase, although the paper says it requires more systematic investigation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ESI does not affect performance on nonepisodic tasks like typical semantic associates and convergent creative riddles.

    “without affecting performance on nonepisodic tasks like typical semantic associates (Madore et al. 2015(Madore et al. , 2016a) ) and convergent creative riddles (Madore et al. 2015).”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Madore et al. 2015

    The General Discussion reports no comparable effect on the object-association task and no reliable effect on Remote Associates Test performance. But it cautions that the convergent-thinking result requires care because the Induction × Task interaction was marginal; the claim’s unqualified “does not affect” is stronger than that finding. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An episodic retrieval manipulation increased not only the retrieval of old ideas but the production of new ideas that were not associated with any one particular past experience.

    “That is, an episodic retrieval manipulation increased not only the retrieval of old ideas but the production of new ideas that were not associated with any one particular past experience, as in our previous induction-related behavioral work (Madore et al. 2015(Madore et al. , 2016a)).”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Madore et al. 2015

    The General Discussion (page not provided) says preliminary data suggest the induction may boost both “old” and “new” ideas. It also says the issue requires more systematic investigation; it does not establish that the new ideas were unrelated to any particular past experience. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Administering an episodic specificity induction increased the number of appropriate uses generated on a subsequent alternate uses task and also increased episodic details on a future simulation task.

    “Critically, administering the specificity induction increased the number of appropriate uses that participants generated on a subsequent alternate uses task, and also increased episodic details on a future simulation task [72].”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Kernels of evidence suggest that neural processes supporting episodic memory may be involved in divergent thinking.

    “Kernels of evidence suggest that neural processes supporting episodic memory-the retrieval of particular elements of prior experiences-may also be involved in divergent thinking, but such processes have typically been characterized as not very relevant for, or even a hindrance to, creative output.”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Madore et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bowden EM Jung-Beeman M 1998 Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems Psychological Science 9 435 440 10.1111/146709280.00082 · DOI
  2. Eichenbaum H Cohen NJ 2001 From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Madore, Kevin P.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2015-07-23
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1461-1468
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W1827753710
Cited by
242
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
30.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008441-30)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG008441, AG 08441, R37AG008441)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 060941, R01MH060941)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
creativity, episodic memory, divergent thinking, episodic memory retrieval, convergent thinking, object association
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Creativity, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Thinking, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review