Cited by 140Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations

Open access
Addis, Donna Rose, Pan, Ling, Musicaro, Regina, Schacter, Daniel L.·2016·Memory

Abstract

Divergent thinking likely plays an important role in simulating autobiographical events. We investigated whether divergent thinking is differentially associated with the ability to construct detailed imagined future and imagined past events as opposed to recalling past events. We also examined whether age differences in divergent thinking might underlie the reduced episodic detail generated by older adults. The richness of episodic detail comprising autobiographical events in young and older adults was assessed using the Autobiographical Interview. Divergent thinking abilities were measured using the Alternative Uses Task. Divergent thinking was significantly associated with the amount of episodic detail for imagined future events. Moreover, while age was significantly associated with imagined episodic detail, this effect was strongly related to age-related changes in episodic retrieval rather than divergent thinking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2014.985591

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correlation between alternate uses performance and episodic details was specific to imagined future events and was not observed for recalled or imagined past events.

    “This correlation with divergent thinking, however, was specific to imagined future events and was not observed for recalled or imagined past events.”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results (Relation between Divergent Thinking and Episodic Simulation; page unavailable) report that all five Alternative Uses measures correlated significantly with episodic detail in imagined future events. But elaboration also correlated significantly with detail in imagined past events and showed a trend for recalled past events. The paper further reports no significant difference between the future and imagined-past relationships, so the claim of a future-specific correlation overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Episodic details from past versus future events do not correlate strongly with divergent thinking.

    “and that episodic details from past (vs.future) events do not correlate strongly with divergent thinking (Addis et al. 2016).”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Addis et al. 2016

    The Results section reports significant correlations between all five divergent-thinking measures and detail in imagined future events, but only one significant correlation for imagined past events. It also reports that the past–future difference was not statistically significant, so the source does not establish a strong contrast between them. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the AUT and OAT involve assembling, integrating, and generating information in response to an object cue, but the AUT involves divergent thinking and episodic imagery.

    “Both the AUT and OAT involve assembling, integrating, and generating information in response to an object cue, but the AUT involves divergent thinking and episodic imagery (Madore et al. 2015(Madore et al. , 2016a;;Addis et al. 2016).”

    From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Addis et al. 2016

    The Materials and Methods section (page unavailable) describes the AUT as generating multiple uses for an object, scored for divergent thinking. The paper also links AUT performance to detail in imagined episodes, but it does not establish that the AUT itself involves episodic imagery. Our copy does not describe the OAT or compare its processes with those of the AUT. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Performance on the alternate uses task was positively correlated with the number of episodic details participants reported when they imagined future personal experiences.

    “Moreover, a study of healthy young and older adults reported that performance on the alternate uses task was positively correlated with the number of episodic details that participants reported when they imagined future personal experiences [71].”

    From Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics (2016) · cites this paper as [71]

  • Cognitive and neuroimaging evidence indicate a connection between episodic future thinking and divergent creative thinking.

    “both cognitive and neuroimaging evidence indicate a connection between episodic future thinking and divergent creative thinking (94–95)”

    From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Musicaro, R., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Addis, Donna Rose
Venue
Memory
Published
2014-12-06
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
89-97
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2161540786
Cited by
140
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG08441)
  • Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (RDF-10-UOA-024)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
divergent thinking, episodic simulation, autobiographical memory, episodic detail, episodic memory retrieval, aging, older adults, age differences, autobiographical interviews, alternative uses task
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Mental Recall, Thinking, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review