Cited by 149RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy induced by self-amplifying mRNA vaccines encoding bacterial antigens

Open access
Maruggi, Giulietta, Chiarot, Emiliano, Giovani, Cinzia, Buccato, Scilla, Bonacci, Stefano, Frigimelica, Elisabetta, Margarit, Immaculada, Geall, Andrew +2 more·2017·Vaccine

Abstract

Nucleic acid vaccines represent an attractive approach to vaccination, combining the positive attributes of both viral vectors and live-attenuated vaccines, without the inherent limitations of each technology. We have developed a novel technology, the Self-Amplifying mRNA (SAM) platform, which is based on the synthesis of self-amplifying mRNA formulated and delivered as a vaccine. SAM vaccines have been shown to stimulate robust innate and adaptive immune responses in small animals and non-human primates against a variety of viral antigens, thus representing a safe and versatile tool against viral infections. To assess whether the SAM technology could be used for a broader range of targets, we investigated the immunogenicity and efficacy of SAM vaccines expressing antigens from Group A (GAS) and Group B (GBS) Streptococci, as models of bacterial pathogens. Two prototype bacterial antigens (the double-mutated GAS Streptolysin-O (SLOdm) and the GBS pilus 2a backbone protein (BP-2a)) were successfully expressed by SAM vectors. Mice immunized with both vaccines produced significant amounts of fully functional serum antibodies. The antibody responses generated by SAM vaccines were capable of conferring consistent protection in murine models of GAS and GBS infections. Inclusion of a eukaryotic secretion signal or boosting with the recombinant protein resulted in higher specific-antibody levels and protection. Our results support the concept of using SAM vaccines as potential solution for a wide range of both viral and bacterial pathogens, due to the versatility of the manufacturing processes and the broad spectrum of elicited protective immune response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.040

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In several studies, maternal vaccination with mRNA-loaded LNPs protected mouse neonates from group A and group B streptococci.

    “In several studies, maternal vaccination with mRNA-loaded LNPs prevented fetal Zika virus transmission in pregnant mice225,226 and protected mouse neonates from herpesvirus227 and group A and group B streptococci228.”
  • Lipid nanoparticle-mRNA vaccines have been reported to induce immune protection against parasitical and bacterial infections.

    “Apart from viral infections, lipid nanoparticle–mRNA vaccines have been reported to induce immune protection against parasitical31 and bacterial30,198 infections.”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bagarazzi ML, Yan J, Morrow MP, Shen X, Parker RL, Lee JC, et al. Immunotherapy against HPV16/18 generates potent TH1 and cytotoxic cellular immune responses. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:155ra38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maruggi, G., Chiarot, E., Giovani, C., Buccato, S., Bonacci, S., Frigimelica, E., Margarit, I., Geall, A., Bensi, G., & Maione, D.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Maruggi, Giulietta
  • Maione, Domenico
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
361-368
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560416222
Cited by
149
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
self-amplifying mRNA vaccine, bacterial antigens, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, streptolysin O, antibody response, protective immunity, nucleic acid vaccines
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Antigens, Bacterial, Disease Models, Animal, Female, RNA, Messenger, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcal Vaccines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review