Cited by 35Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Oxytocin and vulnerable romantic relationships

Grebe, Nicholas M., Kristoffersen, Andreas Aarseth, Grøntvedt, Trond Viggo, Emery Thompson, Melissa, Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen, Gangestad, Steven W.·2017·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Oxytocin (OT) has been implicated in the formation and maintenance of various social relationships, including human romantic relationships. Competing models predict, alternatively, positive or negative associations between naturally-occurring OT levels and romantic relationship quality. Empirical tests of these models have been equivocal. We propose a novel hypothesis ('Identify and Invest') that frames OT as an allocator of psychological investment toward valued, vulnerable relationships, and test this proposal in two studies. In one sample of 75 couples, and a second sample of 148 romantically involved individuals, we assess facets of relationships predicting changes in OT across a thought-writing task regarding one's partner. In both studies, participants' OT change across the task corresponded positively with multiple dimensions of high relationship involvement. However, increases in participants' OT also corresponded to their partners reporting lower relationship involvement. OT increases, then, reflected discrepancies between assessments of self and partner relationship involvement. These findings are robust in a combined analysis of both studies, and do not significantly differ between samples. Collectively, our findings support the 'Identify and Invest' hypothesis in romantic couples, and we argue for its relevance across other types of social bonds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.02.009

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grebe, N. M., Kristoffersen, A. A., Grøntvedt, T. V., Emery Thompson, M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Gangestad, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Grebe, Nicholas M.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
90
Pages
64-74
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594490181
Cited by
34
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, romantic relationships, relationship quality, couples, social bonds
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Oxytocin, Personal Satisfaction, Saliva, Sexual Partners, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review