CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 318Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 273 of the 274 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Neuropsychology of Autobiographical Memory

Open access
GREENBERG, D, RUBIN, D·2003·Cortex
DOI 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70860-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This special issue of Cortex focuses on the relative contribution of different neural networks to memory and the interaction of 'core' memory processes with other cognitive processes. In this article, we examine both. Specifically, we identify cognitive processes other than encoding and retrieval that are thought to be involved in memory; we then examine the consequences of damage to brain regions that support these processes. This approach forces a consideration of the roles of brain regions outside of the frontal, medial-temporal, and diencephalic regions that form a central part of neurobiological theories of memory. Certain kinds of damage to visual cortex or lateral temporal cortex produced impairments of visual imagery or semantic memory; these patterns of impairment are associated with a unique pattern of amnesia that was distinctly different from the pattern associated with medial-temporal trauma. On the other hand, damage to language regions, auditory cortex, or parietal cortex produced impairments of language, auditory imagery, or spatial imagery; however, these impairments were not associated with amnesia. Therefore, a full model of autobiographical memory must consider cognitive processes that are not generally considered 'core processes,' as well as the brain regions upon which these processes depend.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70860-8

Cites

273 of 273 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 318

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
GREENBERG, D., & RUBIN, D.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
GREENBERG, D
ORCID
RUBIN, D
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003
Volume
39
Issue
4-5
Pages
687-728
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70860-8
OpenAlex
W1994535622
Cited by
318
References
274
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG016340, R01 AG16340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
autobiographical memory, neuropsychology of memory, visual imagery, semantic memory, auditory imagery, spatial imagery, language impairment, visual cortex damage, lateral temporal cortex, medial temporal lobe amnesia, parietal cortex, auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Humans, Imagination, Language, Memory, Neuropsychology, Perception, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review