The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this study was to Investigate individual differences in learning from worked-out examples with respect to the quality of self-explanations. Restrictions of former studies (e.g., lacking control of time-on-task) were avoided and additional research questions (e.g., reliability and dimensionality of self-explanation characteristics) were addressed. An investigation with 36 university freshmen students of education working in individual sessions was conducted. The domain was probability calculation. Prior knowledge and the quality of self-explanations (protocols of the individuals' thinking aloud) were assessed as predictors of learning. A post-test was employed to measure the learning gains as the dependent variable. The following main results were obtained. Most self-explanation characteristics could be regarded as relatively stable person characteristics. The individual differences in the quality of self-explanations were, however, found to be multidimensional. Most Important, even when controlling for time-on-task (quantitative aspect), learning gains could be substantially predicted by qualitative differences of self-explanation characteristics. In particular, successful learners tended to employ more prlnciplebased explanations, more explication of operator-goal combinations, and more anticipative reasoning. In addition, there were two types of effective learners, labeled anticipative reasoners and principle-based explainers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Cognitive load research has tended to focus on rule or schema knowledge (kinds of KCs), induction or compilation processes (kinds of LEs), and transfer tests (a kind of AE) to argue in favor of instructional approaches such as increased study of examples (Renkl, 1997).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Renkl, 1997
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Asking learners to explain to themselves aloud what they have understood from a learning task has proved to be an effective instructional method (Chi et al. 1989;Renkl 1997;Renkl and Atkinson 2002).”
From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Renkl 1997
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 · Cited by 2,206
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Sweller, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5 · Cited by 2,020
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_4 · Cited by 1,927
Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process.
Rittle‐Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346 · Cited by 1,155
Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction
Kalyuga, S. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3 · Cited by 1,056
“Faded worked examples ( Renkl 1997; Renkl and Atkinson 2003; Renkl et al. 2002) gradually fade worked-out steps with increased levels of learner expertise by replacing these steps with problem solving sub-tasks.”
BackgroundChi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1 · Cited by 855
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772
“Cognitive load research has tended to focus on rule or schema knowledge (kinds of KCs), induction or compilation processes (kinds of LEs), and transfer tests (a kind of AE) to argue in favor of instructional approaches, such as increased study of examples (Renkl, 1997).”
BackgroundRenkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_3 · Cited by 540
Self-citationEvolution of human cognitive architecture
Sweller, J. (2003) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(03)01015-6 · Cited by 511
Toward an Instructionally Oriented Theory of Example‐Based Learning
Renkl, A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12086 · Cited by 509
Self-citationPaas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2 · Cited by 502
Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling
Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1021258506583 · Cited by 493
Sweller, J. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021808.72598.4d · Cited by 470
Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents.
Atkinson, R. K. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.416 · Cited by 472
Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations
Renkl, A. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00030-5 · Cited by 452
Self-citationRummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2 · Cited by 470
Learning from Worked-Out Examples: The Effects of Example Variability and Elicited Self-Explanations
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0959 · Cited by 374
Self-citationvan Gog, T., PAAS, F. G. W. C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237 · Cited by 359
Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701756420 · Cited by 277
Self-citationGerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021809.10236.71 · Cited by 251
Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load
Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.004 · Cited by 252
Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements
van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Paas, F. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.007 · Cited by 224
How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308320320 · Cited by 224
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.007 · Cited by 178
Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_5 · Cited by 176
Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.1.68 · Cited by 191
The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity.
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000018 · Cited by 167
Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209340235 · Cited by 158
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9092-5 · Cited by 156
Stark, R., Kopp, V., & Fischer, M. R. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.001 · Cited by 154
Western University, Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Western University (2013) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00055 · Cited by 145
Interactivity in Video-based Models
Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4 · Cited by 145
Reisslein, J., Atkinson, R. K., Seeling, P., & Reisslein, M. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.008 · Cited by 138
Making Sense of Generative Learning
Fiorella, L. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7 · Cited by 135
Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning
Rittle‐Johnson, B., & Loehr, A. M. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5 · Cited by 103
Learner Articulation as Interactional Achievement: Studying the Conversation of Gesture
Koschmann, T. D., & Lebaron, C. D. (2002) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2002_4 · Cited by 101
Earley, C. E. (2001) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.81 · Cited by 94
Krauß, S., & Xiaodong, W. A. N. G. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.3 · Cited by 100
Khalil, M. K., Paas, F., Johnson, T. E., & Payer, A. F. (2005) · The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist · doi:10.1002/ar.b.20078 · Cited by 79
Helsdingen, A. S., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022370 · Cited by 84
Learning to prove: The idea of heuristic examples
Reiss, K. M., & Renkl, A. (2002) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/bf02655690 · Cited by 78
Self-citationLearning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats
Evans, K. L., Yaron, D., & Leinhardt, G. (2008) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/b812409b · Cited by 56
Positive transfer and negative transfer/antilearning of problem-solving skills.
Osman, M. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.97 · Cited by 46
A Review of Worked Examples in Programming Activities
Müldner, K., Jennings, J., & Chiarelli, V. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3560266 · Cited by 46
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9079-0 · Cited by 37
On the improvement of students' conceptual understanding in statistics education
Budé, L. M. (2007) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20071005lb · Cited by 36
Further Results from the Evaluation of an Intelligent Computer Tutor to Coach Self-Explanation
Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. A. (2000) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45108-0_34 · Cited by 31
Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making
Makransky, G., Shiwalia, B. M., Herlau, T., & Blurton, S. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10039-x · Cited by 27
Earley, C. E. (2003) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.111 · Cited by 24
Turns, S. R., & Meter, P. N. V. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--17500 · Cited by 26
The Relative Merits of Explicit and Implicit Learning of Contrasted Algebra Principles
Ziegler, E., Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Stern, E. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9424-4 · Cited by 25
Instructional Support for Collaboration in Desktop Videoconference Settings
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-24319-4_4 · Cited by 23
Shall We Explain? Augmenting Learning from Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Peer Collaboration
Hausmann, R. G. M., van de Sande, B., & VanLehn, K. A. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_66 · Cited by 20
Stark, R. (2004) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1023/b:leri.0000037197.78134.cd · Cited by 21
Learning by explaining after pauses in video lectures: Are provided visuals a scaffold or a crutch?
Fiorella, L. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3994 · Cited by 19
Glogger-Frey, I., Treier, A.-K., & Renkl, A. (2022) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09577-6 · Cited by 19
Self-citationWang, Z., & Adesope, O. (2016) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2016.923a · Cited by 17
Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps
Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., & de Jong, T. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09299-7 · Cited by 30
Rampf, S., Gehrig, H., Möltner, A., Fischer, M., Schwendicke, F., & Huth, K. C. (2024) · European Journal Of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/eje.13028 · Cited by 15
Stark, L., Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13051 · Cited by 14
A comparison of tutor and student behavior in speech versus text based tutoring
Rosé, C. P., Litman, D. J., Bhembe, D., Forbes-Riley, K., Silliman, S., Srivastava, R., & VanLehn, K. A. (2003) · doi:10.3115/1118894.1118899 · Cited by 13
Kuldas, S., Hashim, S., Ismail, H. N., & Bakar, Z. A. (2015) · International Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.17583/ijep.2015.832 · Cited by 12
Waldeyer, J., Endres, T., Roelle, J., Baars, M., & Renkl, A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09944-4 · Cited by 14
Self-citationSelf‐explanation activities in statics: A knowledge‐building activity to promote conceptual change
Hoz, J. L. D. L., Vieira, C., & Arteta, C. A. (2023) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20531 · Cited by 12
Wang, C., Li, J., Li, H., Xia, Y., Wang, X., Xie, Y., & Wu, J. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03460-1 · Cited by 10
Chen, X., Mitrović, A., & Mathews, M. (2019) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-019-00179-x · Cited by 9
Micro productive failure and the acquisition of algebraic procedural knowledge
Ziegler, E., Trninić, D., & Kapur, M. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09544-7 · Cited by 11
In-code Comments as a Self-explanation Strategy for Computational Science Education
Vieira, C., Roy, A., Magana, A. J., Falk, M. L., & Reese, M. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.25642 · Cited by 9
Applying Cognitive Science to Online LearningPreprint
Williams, J. J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2535549 · Cited by 8
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Retrieval Practice in Stepwise Worked Examples Improves Learning
van den Broek, G. S. E., van Wermeskerken, M., & van Gog, T. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102196 · Cited by 9
Learning Like “Fast Fish”: A Research Review on the Promise of Contextualized Agency
Cuzzolino, M. P., Grotzer, T. A., & Xu, J. (2023) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x231223510 · Cited by 10
Hale, J. F., Terrien, J., Quirk, M. E., et al. (2018) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s166112 · Cited by 6
Overcoming Problems of Knowledge Application and Transfer
Stark, R., Gruber, H. G., Hinkofer, L., & Mandl, H. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2094-5_4 · Cited by 6
The Effectiveness of Alternative Training Techniques on Analytical Procedures PerformancePreprint
Moreno, K. K., Bhattacharjee, S., & Brandon, D. M. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.739785 · Cited by 6
Effectiveness of Holistic Mental Model Confrontation in Driving Conceptual Change
Gadgil, S. (2008) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e527312012-944 · Cited by 6
Fukuda, M., Nesbit, J. C., & Winne, P. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1446941 · Cited by 5
Davis, J. S. (2020) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.7.9 · Cited by 7
Nogry, S., & Didierjean, A. (2006) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503306001072 · Cited by 5
Scaffolded Self-Explanation with Visual Representations Promotes Efficient Learning in Early AlgebraPreprint
Nagashima, T., Bartel, A. N., Tseng, S., Vest, N. A., Silla, E., Alibali, M. W., & Aleven, V. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/sbwfj · Cited by 5
Pushing the (Visual) Narrative: the Effects of Prior Knowledge Elicitation in Provocative TopicsPreprint
Heyer, J., Raveendranath, N. K., & Reda, K. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/rtfkw · Cited by 5
Relationship Between the Quality of Learning From Failure and Subsequent Problem-Solving:
Shiba, S. (2023) · The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.5926/jjep.71.319 · Cited by 4
Witkowska, M. (1970) · Neofilolog · doi:10.14746/n.2010.34.13 · Cited by 4
Guiding Students’ Attention During Example Study by Showing the Model’s Eye Movements
van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H. M., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. H., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_26 · Cited by 4
Revitalizing Plenary Finance Lectures
Bertheussen, B. A. (2013) · Beta · doi:10.18261/issn1504-3134-2013-01-05 · Cited by 2
Self-Explaining Photosynthesis to Achieve Conceptual Change: An Analysis of Explanation Content
Oliver, M., & Troemel, V. (2022) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.21.7.22 · Cited by 3
Interface Adaptation to Style of User-Computer Interaction
Dimitrova, M., Boyadjiev, D., & Butorin, N. (2000) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44595-1_32 · Cited by 3
Effects of Instruction-Supported Learning with Worked Examples in Quantitative Method Training
Wagner, K., Klein, M., Klopp, E., Puhl, T., & Stark, R. (2013) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v3n3p1 · Cited by 2
Mandatory retrieval test to incentivize retrieval practice of physics principles
Gjerde, V., Marisaldi, M., Oksavik, K., Olafsson, K., Spångberg, H., & Holst, B. (2025) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.21.010119 · Cited by 1
Park, S., Ryu, J., Tak, Y., Jo, S.-B., & Kim, D. (2023) · Educational communications and technology: issues and innovations · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37697-9_12 · Cited by 1
Effects of using learners’ produced screencast as worked examples in learning
Yang, I., & Lau, B. T. (2017) · ICST Transactions on e-Education and e-Learning · doi:10.4108/eai.29-11-2017.153390 · Cited by 1
Sweller, J. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00673 · Cited by 1
Reis, H. M. (2020) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.55.2020.tde-07012020-095959 · Cited by 1
Theorien und Methoden der Expertiseforschung in biologiedidaktischen Studien
Sandmann, A. (2007) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68166-3_21
La interacción entre función y modalidad del lenguaje. Consecuencias teóricas y prácticas
Rodicio, H. G. (2009) · Gredos (University of Salamanca) · doi:10.14201/gredos.22537
Effects of Expertise in Learning From Examples
Urao, A., Shintaro, I. T. O., Aoki, S., & Hayashi, Y. (2011) · Journal of JSEE · doi:10.4307/jsee.59.6_86
Turns, S. R. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--23332
Bonface, K., Gatumu, J., Muriithi, E., et al. (2021) · doi:10.7176/jep/12-33-05
Computergestütztes kollaboratives Lernen (CSCL)
(2008) · X.media.press · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37226-4_23
Metadata
- Authors
- RENKL, A.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- RENKL, A
- ORCID
- RENKL, A
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084895013
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- worked examples, self-explanation, individual differences, learning gains, probability calculation, think-aloud, time on task, prior knowledge, mathematics learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review