Cited by 284Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations

Brody, Carlos D, Romo, Ranulfo, Kepecs, Adam·2003·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Persistent neural activity is observed in many systems, and is thought to be a neural substrate for holding memories over time delays of a few seconds. Recent work has addressed two issues. First, how can networks of neurons robustly hold such an active memory? Computer systems obtain significant robustness to noise by approximating analogue quantities with discrete digital representations. In a similar manner, theoretical models of persistent activity in spiking neurons have shown that the most robust and stable way to store the short-term memory of a continuous parameter is to approximate it with a discrete representation. This general idea applies very broadly to mechanisms that range from biochemical networks to single cells and to large circuits of neurons. Second, why is it commonly observed that persistent activity in the cortex can be strongly time-varying? This observation is almost ubiquitous, and therefore must be taken into account in our models and our understanding of how short-term memories are held in the cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00050-3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some state variables may exert graded effects on wakefulness rather than triggering discrete state transitions.

    “Furthermore, some state variables may exert a graded effect on the character of wakefulness, rather than triggering transitions between discrete states”

    From Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses (2015) · cites this paper as Brody et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brody, C. D., Romo, R., & Kepecs, A.
Affiliations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Corresponding author
Brody, Carlos D
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
204-211
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974408180
Cited by
284
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
persistent activity, short-term memory, continuous attractors, dynamic representations, spiking neural networks
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review