Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,028

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity

Hogan, Thomas P., Awad, A. G., Eastwood, Robin·1983·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Synopsis: Schizophrenic patients' self-reports of their experience of neuroleptic treatment were used as the basis for the construction of a scale predictive of drug compliance. Reliability analysis of the responses of 150 patients indicated high internal consistency in the 30-item scale, and preliminary validation in the form of discriminant classification accurately assigned 89% of the sample to compliant and non-compliant groupings. Both discriminant and factor analyses suggest that maximum variability in responding is accounted for by items reflecting how the patient feels on medication, rather than what he knows or believes about medication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700050182

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770330075006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280087009 · DOI
  3. Singh, 1976, Dysphoric response to neuroleptic treatment in schizophrenia and its prognostic significance, Diseases of the Nervous System, 37, 191
  4. Sackett, 1976, Compliance with Therapeutic Regimens
  5. 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770130045004 · DOI
  6. 10.1192/bjp.110.464.46 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/h0046007 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF02289743 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1176/ajp.127.12.1631 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF02289652 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0033291700006632 · DOI
  12. DiMascio, 1970, Clinical Handbook of Psychopharmacology, 185
  13. 10.2307/2948420 · DOI
  14. 10.1192/bjp.129.6.513 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/00005053-196109000-00003 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)35350-X · DOI
  17. 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780270073010 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760130049008 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Barofsky, 1976, Compliance with Therapeutic Regimens, 100
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1576 · DOI
  21. Nevins, 1977, Adverse response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia, International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 6, 227
  22. 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002041 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780120013001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Bock, 1975, Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research
  25. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1963.tb07482.x · DOI
  26. 10.1136/bmj.1.5283.972 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760230138011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770290127012 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.648 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Reilly, 1967, Clinical characteristics and medication history of schizophrenics readmitted to the hospital, International Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 3, 85
  31. Nunnally, 1967, Psychometric Theory
  32. 10.1016/0010-440X(77)90047-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hogan, T. P., Awad, A. G., & Eastwood, R.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1983-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
177-183
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2116246373
Cited by
1,028
References
0
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.