Cited by 169Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The anhedonia hypothesis: mark III.

Wise, Roy A.·1985·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x00020306

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wise, R. A.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wise, Roy A.
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
1985-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
178-186
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2030325444
Cited by
169
References
104
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anhedonia, reward, motivation, depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review