Cited by 164Diabetes Management and ResearchElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsOcular Surface and Contact Lens

Clinical Evidence for Use of a Noninvasive Biosensor for Tear Glucose as an Alternative to Painful Finger-Prick for Diabetes Management Utilizing a Biopolymer Coating

Open access
Kownacka, Alicja E., Vegelyte, Dovile, Joosse, Maurits, Anton, Nicoleta, Toebes, B. Jelle, Lauko, Jan, Buzzacchera, Irene, Lipinska, Katarzyna +3 more·2018·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Diabetes is a metabolic condition that is exponentially increasing worldwide. Current monitoring methods for diabetes are invasive, painful, and expensive. Herein, we present the first multipatient clinical trial that demonstrates clearly that tear fluid may be a valuable marker for systemic glucose measurements. The NovioSense Glucose Sensor, worn under the lower eye lid (inferior conjunctival fornix), is reported to continuously measure glucose levels in the basal tear fluid with good correlation to blood glucose values, showing clear clinical feasibility in both animals and humans. Furthermore, the polysaccharide coated device previously reported by our laboratory when worn, does not induce pain or irritation. In a phase II clinical trial, six patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus were enrolled and the capability of the device to measure glucose in the tear fluid was evaluated. The NovioSense Glucose Sensor gives a stable signal and the results correlate well to blood glucose values obtained from finger-prick measurements determined by consensus error grid analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01429

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scientific data evidenced how commercially available test strips exhibit the required performance to evaluate glucose concentration in low-volume tears.

    “Scientific data evidenced how commercially available test strips exhibit the required performance to evaluate glucose concentration in low-volume tears 166-168.”

    From Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices (2022) · cites this paper as [166]

    The Results and Discussion describe glucose test strips used to analyze blood samples, while a separate NovioSense sensor measured tear glucose. The Introduction notes the tear film’s small volume, but our copy does not assess whether commercially available strips can measure glucose in low-volume tears (searched for test strips and tear volume). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent clinical trial demonstrated great correlation between tear and blood glucose concentrations in animals and humans (including patients with type 1 diabetes).

    “A recent clinical trial demonstrated great correlation between tear and blood glucose concentrations in animals and humans (including patients with type 1 diabetes)119.”

    From Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring (2019) · cites this paper as [119]

  • Such sensor placement at the base of the eye provides continuously accessible tear glucose measurements when coupled with wireless data transmission, without causing discomfort.

    “Such sensor placement at the base of the eye (behind the eyelid) provides continuously accessible tear glucose measurements when coupled with wireless data transmission, without causing discomfort.”

    From Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring (2019) · cites this paper as [119]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kownacka, A. E., Vegelyte, D., Joosse, M., Anton, N., Toebes, B. J., Lauko, J., Buzzacchera, I., Lipinska, K., Wilson, D. A., Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, N., & Wilson, C. J.
Affiliations
  • NovioSense B.V. , NovioTech Campus, Transistorweg 5 , ,
  • Medisch Centrum Haaglanden (NL)
  • Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, Nel
  • Wilson, Christopher J.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2018-10-12
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
4504-4511
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2898045499
Cited by
164
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 642687)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
tear glucose, non-invasive glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, biosensors, conjunctival fornix, polysaccharide coatings, clinical trials
MeSH terms
Animals, Biopolymers, Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Rabbits, Sheep, Tears, Biosensing Techniques, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review