Cited by 1,290Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Undoing Effect of Positive Emotions

Open access

Abstract

Positive emotions are hypothesized to undo the cardiovascular aftereffects of negative emotions. Study 1 tests this undoing effect. Participants (n = 170) experiencing anxiety-induced cardiovascular reactivity viewed a film that elicited (a) contentment, (b) amusement, (c) neutrality, or (d) sadness. Contentment-eliciting and amusing films produced faster cardiovascular recovery than neutral or sad films did. Participants in Study 2 (n = 185) viewed these same films following a neutral state. Results disconfirm the alternative explanation that the undoing effect reflects a simple replacement process. Findings are contextualized by Fredrickson's broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions (B. L. Fredrickson, 1998).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010796329158

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 66 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
42 of 42
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Cardiovascular reactivity sparked by certain negative emotions prepares the body for specific actions.

    “Assuming (as most emotion theorists do) that the cardiovascular reactivity sparked by certain negative emotions prepares the body for specific actions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Men and African Americans are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease and have exhibited greater cardiovascular reactivity to negative emotions.

    “Men and African Americans are important to study because these groups are known to be at greater risk for cardiovascular disease and have exhibited greater cardiovascular”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Not confirmedt(91) = 1.79reported p = .038 · recomputed p = .077

    “t(91) = 1.79, p = .038”

  • Not confirmedt(91) = 2.68reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .009

    “t(91) = 2.68, p = .004”

  • Not confirmedt(91) = 1.66reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .100

    “t(91) = 1.66, p = .050”

  • Not confirmedt(91) = 2.55reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .012

    “t(91) = 2.55, p = .006”

  • Not confirmedt(72) = 2.43reported p = .008 · recomputed p = .018

    “t(72) = 2.43, p = .008”

  • Not confirmedt(72) = 1.78reported p = .039 · recomputed p = .079

    “t(72) = 1.78, p = .039”

  • ConsistentF(1, 91) = 5.38reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .023

    “F(1, 91) = 5.38, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(3, 81) = 3.4reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .022

    “F(3, 81) = 3.40, p < .05”

  • Consistentχ²(3) = 9.89reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .020

    “χ 2 (3) = 9.89, p < .05”

  • ConsistentF(2, 63) = 3.29reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .044

    “F(2, 63) = 3.29, p < .05”

  • Consistentχ²(2) = 5.88reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .053

    “χ 2 (2) = 5.88, p = .05”

  • ConsistentF(3, 169) = 51.25reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(3, 169) = 51.25,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 169) = 6.23reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .014

    “F(1, 169) = 6.23, p = .014”

  • ConsistentF(3, 169) = 3.09reported p = .029 · recomputed p = .029

    “F(3, 169) = 3.09, p = .029”

  • ConsistentF(3, 169) = 3.64reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .014

    “F(3, 169) = 3.64, p = .014”

  • ConsistentF(3, 169) = 3.06reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .030

    “F(3, 169) = 3.06, p = .030”

16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fredrickson, B. L. (in press-b). Positive emotions. In C. R. Synder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Lee, P. C. (1983). Play as a means for developing relationships. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Primate social relationships (pp. 82–89). Oxford: Blackwell.
  4. Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 123–126). New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Williams, R. B., Barefoot, J. C., & Shekelle, R. B. (1985). The health consequences of hostility. In M. A. Chesney & R. H. Rosenman (Eds.), Anger and hostility in cardiovascular and behavioral disorders (pp. 173–185). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,290

Metadata

Authors
Fredrickson, B. L., Mancuso, R. A., Branigan, C., & Tugade, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Fredrickson, Barbara L.
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2000-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
237-258
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2146844405
Cited by
1,290
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 57
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059615)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
positive emotions, cardiovascular reactivity, anxiety, cardiovascular recovery, contentment, amusements, sadness, broaden-and-build theory, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review