CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 796Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory.

Wolfe, David A., Scott, Katreena, Reitzel-Jaffe, Deborah, Wekerle, Christine, Grasley, Carolyn, Straatman, Anna-Lee·2001·Psychological Assessment
DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Four studies examined the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI), a measure of abusive behavior among adolescent dating partners. Exploratory factor analysis was used to refine items based on high school participants with dating experience (N = 393; 49% female). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to derive and cross-validate the factor structure with participants from 10 high schools (N = 1,019, 55% female; ages 14-16). The model structure fit for all grades and both sexes, with physical abuse, verbal abuse, and threatening behavior most representative of the underlying "abuse" factor. In Studies 3 and 4, the second-order abuse factor showed acceptable test-retest reliability, partner agreement, and correlation (significant for males only) between observer ratings of dating partners' interactions and youths' CADRI scores. Results support the CADRI as a measure of abusive behavior in adolescent dating relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Arbuckle, 1999, AMOS 4.0 user's guide.
  2. 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00309-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40 · DOI
  4. Bentler, 1995, EQS structural equations program manual.
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00101.x · DOI
  7. 10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.546 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/1131876 · DOI
  9. Furman, 1997, Adolescent romantic relationships: A developmental perspective., 21
  10. Gray, 1997, Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 126, 10.1177/088626097012001008 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/353382 · DOI
  12. Hoyle, 1995, Writing about structural equation models., 158
  13. Hu, 1995, Evaluating model fit., 76
  14. 10.1016/S1359-1789(97)00049-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1023/A:1007545302987 · DOI
  16. Joreskog, 1986, LISREL VI.
  17. Kasian, 1992, Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350, 10.1177/088626092007003005 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.197 · DOI
  19. MacCallum, 1995, Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues., 16
  20. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00143-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/jado.1994.1049 · DOI
  23. Molidor, 1998, Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence., Violence Against Women, 4, 180, 10.1177/1077801298004002004 · DOI
  24. Neeman, 1995, The changing importance of romantic relationship involvement to competence from late childhood to late adolescence., Development and Psychopathology, 7, 727, 10.1017/S0954579400006817 · DOI
  25. O'Keefe, 1997, Predictors of dating violence among high school students., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546, 10.1177/088626097012004005 · DOI
  26. O'Keefe. 1998 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.2.263 · DOI
  28. Pan, 1994, Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the modified conflict tactics., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 366, 10.1177/088626094009003006 · DOI
  29. Poitras, 1995, A study of the prevalence of sexual coercion in adolescent heterosexual dating relationships in a Quebec sample., Violence and Victims, 10, 299, 10.1891/0886-6708.10.4.299 · DOI
  30. Satorra. Robustness issues in structured equation modeling: A review of recent developments. Quality & Quantity 24 367 1990 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0167-9473(90)90004-2 · DOI
  32. Schafer, 1996, Measuring spousal violence with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Notes on reliability and validity issues., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 572, 10.1177/088626096011004008 · DOI
  33. Shapiro, 1991, A three-component model of children's teasing: Aggression, humor, and ambiguity., Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 459, 10.1521/jscp.1991.10.4.459 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00978703 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/351733 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sugarman, 1997, Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review., Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 275, 10.1177/088626097012002008 · DOI
  37. Tolman, 1989, The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners., Violence and Victims, 4, 173, 10.1891/0886-6708.4.3.159 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00091-9 · DOI
  39. Wolfe, 1997, Alternatives to violence: Empowering youth to develop healthy relationships., 10.4135/9781483327846 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0954579498001345 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A.-L.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
277-293
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
DOI
10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277
OpenAlex
W2049140572
Cited by
796
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
adolescent dating relationships, abusive behavior, dating violence, physical abuse, verbal abuse, threatening behavior, instrument development, factor structure, test-retest reliability, partnership agreements, observer ratings, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouse Abuse, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review