Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate.

Kenrick, Douglas T., Funder, David C.·1988·American Psychologist

DOI 10.1037/0003-066x.43.1.23

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.43.1.23

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT.
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256404 · Cited by 4,519
A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006824100041 · Cited by 4,071
Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5 · Cited by 3,414
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00030-4 · Cited by 1,533
Testosterone and dominance in men
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x98001228 · Cited by 1,447
An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021212 · Cited by 1,059
Whole Trait Theory
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009 · Cited by 839
Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty
Iyengar, S. (1990) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf00992330 · Cited by 787
9 Creativity in Organizations
George, J. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559814 · Cited by 781
Do people's self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life.
Swann, W. B., Chang-Schneider, C., & Larsen McClarty, K. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.84 · Cited by 746
Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.55.1.149 · Cited by 582
Self-citation
Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels‐of‐analysis issues
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Compliance with a Request in Two Cultures: The Differential Influence of Social Proof and Commitment/Consistency on Collectivists and Individualists
Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299258006 · Cited by 458
ARE SOME PEOPLE CRIME‐PRONE? REPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONALITY‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENDERS, RACES, AND METHODS*
CASPI, A., MOFFITT, T. E., SILVA, P. A., STOUTHAMER‐LOEBER, M., KRUEGER, R. F., & SCHMUTTE, P. S. (1994) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01151.x · Cited by 438
Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms.
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.3 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
The ADHD Response-Inhibition Deficit as Measured by the Stop Task: Replication with DSM–IV Combined Type, Extension, and Qualification
Nigg, J. T. (1999) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1021980002473 · Cited by 249
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019 · Cited by 248
Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation.
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415 · Cited by 239
The cumulative continuity model of personality development: Striking a balance between continuity and change in personality traits across the life course
Roberts, B. W., & Caspi, A. (2003) · Understanding Human Development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_9 · Cited by 231
Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within- and cross-context fluctuations in affect, self-evaluations, and behavior in everyday life
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003 · Cited by 210
Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation
Wu, C. C., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Katovich, K., & Knutson, B. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.055 · Cited by 176
On Traits, Situations, and Their Integration: A Developmental Perspective
Roberts, B. W., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_5 · Cited by 134
Perceiving artificial social agents
Holtgraves, T. M., Ross, S. J., Weywadt, C. R., & Han, T. L. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.017 · Cited by 131
Human Cognition Through the Lens of Social Engineering Cyberattacks
Montañez, R., Golob, E., & Xu, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01755 · Cited by 106
A Connectionist Approach to the Organization and Continuity of Working Models of Attachment
Fraley, R. C. (2007) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00471.x · Cited by 98
If the person–situation debate is really over, why does it still generate so much negative affect?
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.009 · Cited by 65
Individual differences in contingencies between situation characteristics and personality states.
Kuper, N., Breil, S. M., Horstmann, K. T., Roemer, L., Lischetzke, T., Sherman, R. A., Back, M. D., Denissen, J. J. A., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000435 · Cited by 63
I'm lonely, can't you tell? Convergent validity of self- and informant ratings of loneliness
Luhmann, M., Bohn, J., Holtmann, J., Koch, T., & Eid, M. (2016) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.002 · Cited by 61

Authors: Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C.
Venue: American Psychologist
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1988
Volume: 43
Issue: 1
Pages: 23-34
ISSN: 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
1935-990X
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.43.1.23
OpenAlex: W4297832221
Cited by: 837
References: 0
FWCI: 57.05
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review