Cited by 2,333Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study

Abstract

The authors investigated the emergence of gender differences in clinical depression and the overall development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood among members of a complete birth cohort using a prospective longitudinal approach with structured diagnostic interviews administered 5 times over the course of 10 years. Small gender differences in depression (females greater than males) first began to emerge between the ages of 13 and 15. However, the greatest increase in this gender difference occurred between ages 15 and 18. Depression rates and accompanying gender differences for a university student subsample were no different than for a nonuniversity subsample. There was no gender difference for depression recurrence or for depression symptom severity. The peak increase in both overall rates of depression and new cases of depression occurred between the ages of 15 and 18. Results suggest that middle-to-late adolescence (ages 15-18) may be a critical time for studying vulnerability to depression because of the higher depression rates and the greater risk for depression onset and dramatic increase in gender differences in depression during this period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.107.1.128

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,017

Metadata

Authors
Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1998-02
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
128-140
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2110531929
Cited by
2,333
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 131 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 136
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, gender differences, developmental trajectories, adolescence, early adulthood, depression onset, depression recurrence, depression severity, birth cohort, depression vulnerability, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Personality Development, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review