Cited by 418Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Prospective incidence of first onsets and recurrences of depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression.

Alloy, Lauren B., Abramson, Lyn Y., Whitehouse, Wayne G., Hogan, Michael E., Panzarella, Catherine, Rose, Donna T.·2006·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Do negative cognitive styles provide similar vulnerability to first onsets versus recurrences of depressive disorders, and are these associations specific to depression? The authors followed for 2.5 years prospectively college freshmen (N = 347) with no initial psychiatric disorders at high-risk (HR) versus low-risk (LR) for depression on the basis of their cognitive styles. HR participants had odds of major, minor, and hopelessness depression that were 3.5-6.8 times greater than the odds for LR individuals. Negative cognitive styles were similarly predictive of first onsets and recurrences of major depression and hopelessness depression but predicted first onsets of minor depression more strongly than recurrences. The risk groups did not differ in incidence of anxiety disorders not comorbid with depression or other disorders, but HR participants were more likely to have an onset of anxiety comorbid with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.115.1.145

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Panzarella, C., & Rose, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Mental Health Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2006-02
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
145-156
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2078978171
Cited by
418
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
31.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH43866, MH48216)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, cognitive style, negative cognitive style, depression recurrence, first-episode depression, minor depression, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, comorbidities, depression risk, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Incidence, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review