Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study.

Gottfried, Adele Eskeles, Fleming, James S., Gottfried, Allen W.·2001·Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two aspects of continuity, stability of individual differences and means, were examined in a longitudinal study from the middle elementary through the high school years. Two hypotheses regarding individual-difference stability were supported with structural equation modeling in both the general-verbal and math domains: (a) Academic intrinsic motivation is a stable construct throughout these years, and (b) with advancement in age, academic intrinsic motivation becomes increasingly stable. A third hypothesis, that the mean level of academic intrinsic motivation declines over these ages, also was supported, and significant linear trends were obtained, but it was also found to be modified by particular subject areas, with math showing the greatest decline and social studies showing no significant change. The combination of these 2 aspects of continuity places those with low motivation early in their schooling particularly at risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 1994, Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America.
  2. Asendorpf, 1992, Continuity and stability of personality traits and personality patterns., 116
  3. Berlyne, 1965, Curiosity and education., 67
  4. Berlyne, 1971, What next? Concluding summary., 186
  5. Block, 1971, Lives through time.
  6. 10.2307/1131226 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/1131221 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.631 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2307/1132277 · DOI
  12. Gottfried, 1994, Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects.
  13. 10.1037/0012-1649.17.3.300 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hunt, 1966, The epigenesis of intrinsic motivation and early cognitive learning., 84
  15. Joreskog, 1977, Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data., 285
  16. Lepper, 1983, Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation: Implications for the classroom., 281
  17. Lightfoot, 1992, Description and explanation in developmental research: Separate agendas., 207
  18. Maw, 1971, Differences in the personalities of children differing in curiosity., 91
  19. Nicholls, 1983, Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education., 211
  20. Pittman, 1983, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Limiting conditions on the undermining and enhancing effects of reward on intrinsic motivation., 319
  21. Stodolsky, 1988, The subject matters.
  22. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001-03
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
3-13
ISSN
  • 1939-2176
  • 0022-0663
DOI
10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
Cited by
573
References
63
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.