Cited by 1,412Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis, derived from terror management theory, that reminding people of their mortality increases attraction to those who consensually validate their beliefs and decreases attraction to those who threaten their beliefs. In Study 1, subjects with a Chris-tian religious background were asked to form impressions of Christian and Jewish target persons. Before doing so, mortality was made salient to half of the subjects. In support of predictions, mortal-ity salience led to more positive evaluations of the in-group member (the Christian) and more nega-tive evaluations of the out-group member (the Jew). In Study 2, mortality salience led to especially negative evaluations of an attitudinally dissimilar other, but only among subjects high in authoritari-anism. In Study 3, mortality salience led to especially positive reactions to someone who directly praised subjects ' cultural worldviews and especially negative reactions to someone who criticized them. The implications of these findings for understanding in-group favoritism, prejudice, and intol-erance of deviance are discussed. One of the most destructive and perplexing problems facing contemporary society is the pervasive tendency of people to re-spond with hostility and disdain toward those who are different

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1990-02
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
308-318
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2106674466
Cited by
1,412
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 59
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, cultural worldview, in-group favoritism, prejudice, authoritarianism, intergroup evaluation, attitude similarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review