Cited by 624Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior.

Aarts, Henk, Dijksterhuis, Ap·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

On the basis of the idea that situational norms are mentally represented as associations between environments and normative behavior, it was proposed that an environment can automatically direct normative behavior. More specifically, when situational norms are well-established (e.g., when entering the library, one should be silent), an environment is capable of automatically activating mental representations of normative behavior and the behavior itself. In these experiments, participants were exposed to pictures of environments, and effects on accessibility of representations of normative behavior and on actual behavior were assessed. Results indicated that representations of behavior and actual behavior itself are activated automatically when (a) goals to visit the environment are active and (b) strong associations between environment and normative behavior are established.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social norms not only spur but also guide action in direct and meaningful ways.

    “the research has clearly established that social norms not only spur but also guide action in direct and meaningful ways (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2003;Cialdini, Kallgren, & Reno, 1991;Darley & Latane´, 1970;Goldstein, Cialdini, & Griskevicius, 2006;Kerr, 1995;Terry & Hogg, 2001).”

    From The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms (2007) · cites this paper as Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2147126411
Cited by
624
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 43
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
automatic activation, mental representation, normative behavior, environmental cues, goal-directed behavior, associative learning, social behavior
MeSH terms
Affect, Habits, Humans, Libraries, Noise, Random Allocation, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Responsibility, Voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review