The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for motivated reasoning.
Abstract
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective 55-58 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Khatun et al. (2022) and Ahsan et al. (2022) identify involuntary non-migrants in Bangladesh using retrospective, self-reported survey data, which run the risk of motivated reasoning (Kunda 1990).”
From Trapped by climate change? (In)voluntary immobility in Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“People may process information in a manner that is consistent with their partisan identities, prior beliefs, and motivations, a process known as motivated cognition (34–37).”
From Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The processing of false information is likely to be motivated by a confirmation bias (e.g., Hameleers et al., 2024): People are more likely to uncritically accept information when it reassures their worldviews and political attitudes, and critically scrutinize information when it does not confirm their existing worldviews (e.g., Kunda, 1990).”
From How persuasive are political cheapfakes disseminated via social media? The effects of out-of-context visual disinformation on message credibility and issue agreement (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Based on various theories, such as the theory of motivated reasoning, which explains that decisions are often based on pre-determined goals and desirability rather than an accurate reflection of the evidence (Kunda, 1990), researchers have identified a few individual variables that may motivate the person to believe misinformation they are exposed to.These include political orientation (Chen et al”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“the reason being people's motivated reasoning (Grossman, 2014; Kunda, 1990)-the tendency to interpret reality in a self-serving way.”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“It is proposed that there are two distinct but coexisting human motivations that account for citizens' choice and consumption of political information: directional vs. accuracy (Kunda, 1990, or defensive vs. accuracy in Hart et al., 2009, or cognitive consistency vs. understanding in Holbert et al., 2013).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The underlying reason for the reinforcing tendency of algorithms is that algorithms are naturally designed to operate with, not against, human tendencies, one of which is that people feel more comfortable with consistency and confirmation (Kunda, 1990).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Yet, given the human tendency toward psychological consistency (Kunda, 1990), cognitive salience of counter-attitudinal ideas in the user mind would not be strong enough to drive routine searches online.”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The self has a powerful need to see itself as having integrity, but it must do so within the constraints of reality (Adler 2012, Kunda 1990, Pennebaker & Chung 2011, Wilson 2011).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“One kind of less epistemically rational but more epistemically committal belief in AI consciousness may manifest when AI users continue to attribute consciousness to chatbots even when strong evidence suggests otherwise, because their reasoning processes are distorted by cognitive or motivational biases.”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“many motivationally biased beliefs aren't yet fully insulated from counterevidence but depend on what has been called an”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive–motivational, insofar as they involve the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition), as described in several classic social psychological theories88,96,97.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“It is also important to emphasize that many of these top-down influences occur automatically and without awareness (Kunda, 1990; Nickerson, 1998; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Thus, such use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that then can bias the observations and interpretation of the actual evidence”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 2×
“In several studies, incentives or admonitions to be accurate did not eliminate bias ( Fischhoff, 1977 ; Kahneman & Tversky, 1972a ; Lord, Lepper, & Preston, 1984 ; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 2×
“Bem (1972) argued that the findings could also result from self-perception: The subjects, who have limited direct ac-”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 9,025
Costa, D. F., Carvalho, F. D. M., Moreira, B. C. D. M., & do Prado, J. W. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2371-5 · Cited by 191
The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID‐19 pandemic
Wolf, L. J., Haddock, G., Manstead, A. S. R., & Maio, G. R. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12401 · Cited by 164
Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Motives
Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0017 · Cited by 173
McFarland, C., & Buehler, R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1424 · Cited by 163
What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias?
Peters, U. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1 · Cited by 236
“…Harries note that while all of these cognitions have been labeled ‘confirmation bias’, (1)–(4) are also sometimes viewed as components of ‘motivated reasoning’ (or ‘wishful thinking’) (ibid: 45), i.e., information processing that leads people to arrive at the conclusions they favor (Kunda 1990).”
BackgroundAn integrated framework for ISO 9000 motivation, depth of ISO implementation and firm performance
Jang, W., & Lin, C. (2008) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410380810847918 · Cited by 163
The coherence effect: Blending cold and hot cognitions.
Simon, D., Stenstrom, D. M., & Read, S. J. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000029 · Cited by 162
Truth and Consequences: The Costs and Benefits of Accurate Self-Knowledge
Brown, J. D., & Dutton, K. A. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672952112006 · Cited by 158
Han, P. K. J., Moser, R. P., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730600637541 · Cited by 168
Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties
Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., Vasilopoulos, P., & Foucault, M. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12571 · Cited by 186
Ballew, M. T., Pearson, A. R., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102024 · Cited by 176
Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps
Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12349 · Cited by 269
Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them
Bonaccorsi, A. J., Apreda, R., & Fantoni, G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119855 · Cited by 162
Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Hilbert, M., Liu, B., & Luu, J. (2020) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2020.1757365 · Cited by 164
“Yet, given the human tendency toward psychological consistency (Kunda, 1990), cognitive salience of counter-attitudinal ideas in the user mind would not be strong enough to drive routine searches online.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-Signaling and Diagnostic Utility in Everyday Decision Making
Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003) · The Psychology of Economic Decisions · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199251063.003.0006 · Cited by 258
Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes
Braman, E., & Nelson, T. E. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00290.x · Cited by 161
Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations.
Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000021 · Cited by 171
Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change
Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1003-1 · Cited by 167
When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence
Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014372008257 · Cited by 158
Leary, M., Terry, M. L., Allen, A. B., & Tate, E. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309342595 · Cited by 123
Self-Affirmations Provide a Broader Perspective on Self-Threat
Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. A. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214554956 · Cited by 180
Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in India
Badrinathan, S. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000459 · Cited by 191
How Do Values Affect Behavior? Let Me Count the Ways
Sagiv, L., & Roccas, S. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211015975 · Cited by 160
Thill, E. E., & Cury, F. (2000) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1 · Cited by 26
Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias.
Ito, T. A., Friedman, N. P., Bartholow, B. D., Correll, J., Loersch, C., Altamirano, L. J., & Miyake, A. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038557 · Cited by 159
Beyond Social Contagion: Associative Diffusion and the Emergence of Cultural Variation
Goldberg, A., & Stein, S. K. (2018) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418797576 · Cited by 160
Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated
Luke, T. J. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619838258 · Cited by 174
Selective Use of Heunrstic and Systematic Processing Under Defense Motivation
Giner-Sorolila, R., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297231009 · Cited by 159
Changing minds about electric cars: An empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach
Wolf, I., Schröder, T., Neumann, J., & de Haan, G. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.010 · Cited by 170
Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.001 · Cited by 162
Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion
Strickland, A. A., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2011) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-1460524 · Cited by 158
Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027408.72713.45 · Cited by 157
Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000290 · Cited by 173
The Emergency of Climate Change: Why Are We Failing to Take Action?
Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2009) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01180.x · Cited by 165
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12321 · Cited by 174
Becker, J. A., Porter, E. V., & Centola, D. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1817195116 · Cited by 162
What is the “science of science communication”?
Kahan, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.14030404 · Cited by 161
Levy, N. L. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192895325.001.0001 · Cited by 173
The dark side of meaning-making: How social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking
Graeupner, D., & Coman, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003 · Cited by 162
Barriers to Resolution in Ideologically Based Negotiations: The Role of Values and Institutions
Wade‐Benzoni, K. A., Hoffman, A. J., Thompson, L., Moore, D. A., GILLESPIE, J. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922336 · Cited by 189
Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship: Table 1.
Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/659755 · Cited by 155
The neuroscience of motivated cognition
Hughes, B., & Zaki, J. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006 · Cited by 167
Intentional Self-Deception in a Single Coherent Self
Talbott, W. J. (1995) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2108309 · Cited by 155
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1279.009 · Cited by 152
Prevalence and Effects of Rape Myths in Print Journalism
Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., Cepress, S. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2008) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801207313971 · Cited by 154
Song, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, M., Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Shi, J. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0448 · Cited by 156
Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research
Petelczyc, C., Capezio, A., Wang, L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Aquino, K. F. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206317731519 · Cited by 157
When resistance is futile: consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty.
Rucker, D., & Petty, R. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.219 · Cited by 172
Detecting Regime Shifts: The Causes of Under- and Overreaction
Massey, C., & Wu, G. (2005) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0386 · Cited by 152
Accounting as an affective technology: A study of circulation, agency and entrancement
Boedker, C., & Chua, W. F. (2013) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.05.001 · Cited by 153
The Decision to Persist with Underperforming Alliances: The Role of Trust and Control
Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00791.x · Cited by 156
Giebelhausen, M. D., Chun, H. H., Cronin, J. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.14.0497 · Cited by 166
Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.965 · Cited by 153
Self-citationMotivated person perception: Constructing justifications for desired beliefs
Klein, W. M. P., & Kunda, Z. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90036-j · Cited by 153
Self-citationReflecting on Six Decades of Selective Exposure Research: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x · Cited by 152
Visceral influences on risk‐taking behavior
Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., Epstein, E. B., Jacobson, J. A., & MacDonald, T. K. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.520 · Cited by 152
EPISTEMIC ANXIETY AND ADAPTIVE INVARIANTISM
Nagel, J. (2010) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00198.x · Cited by 153
Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments
Rudolph, T. J. (2006) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00451.x · Cited by 152
Who Believes the Hype? An Experimental Examination of How Language Affects Investor Judgments
Hales, J., Kuang, X., & Venkataraman, S. (2010) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00394.x · Cited by 148
The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
Stanovich, K. E. (2021) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13367.001.0001 · Cited by 152
Making sense of overconfidence in market entry
Cain, D. M., Moore, D. A., & Haran, U. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2196 · Cited by 151
Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence
Tsai, C. I., Klayman, J., & Hastie, R. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.005 · Cited by 155
Nakhaeizadeh, S., Dror, I. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2013) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.11.003 · Cited by 151
Knowledge ascriptions and the psychological consequences of changing stakes
Nagel, J. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400801886397 · Cited by 151
Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L., & Newman, G. E. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034701 · Cited by 151
Blue and Red Voices: Effects of Political Ideology on Consumers’ Complaining and Disputing Behavior
Jung, K., Garbarino, E., Briley, D. A., & Wynhausen, J. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx037 · Cited by 157
Examining the relationships between e-WOM, consumer ethnocentrism and brand equity
Sun, Y., González‐Jiménez, H., & Wang, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.040 · Cited by 194
Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: Evidence from Experimental Asset Markets
Kirchler, E. M., & Maciejovsky, B. (2002) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1023/a:1016319430881 · Cited by 151
Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals.
Freitas, A. L., Salovey, P., & Liberman, N. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.410 · Cited by 159
Bounded Rationality and the Diffusion of Modern Investment Treaties
Poulsen, L. N. S. (2013) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12051 · Cited by 152
Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment: The Road to Self-Enhancement Is Paved with Good Intentions
Kruger, J., & Gilovich, T. D. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203259932 · Cited by 150
Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E. A., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2016) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699016678186 · Cited by 150
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., & Mantel, S. P. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212944 · Cited by 154
Affective influences on partner choice: Role of mood in social decisions.
Forgas, J. P. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.708 · Cited by 154
Kahan, D. M., Wittlin, M., Peters, E. M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1871503 · Cited by 166
O'Brien, B. (2009) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/a0017881 · Cited by 149
Antecedents and Consequences of Group-Based Guilt: The Effects of Ingroup Identification
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206064637 · Cited by 149
Why wasn't O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference
Thagard, P. R. (2003) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/0269993024400002 · Cited by 147
Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction.
Byram, S. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.3.3.216 · Cited by 149
Gilbert, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.011 · Cited by 153
The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias
Weijters, B., Geuens, M., & Schillewaert, N. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.09.003 · Cited by 152
Buijs, A. E., & Lawrence, A. (2012) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.002 · Cited by 167
Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance
Au, K. Y.-F., Chan, F., Wang, D., & Vertinsky, I. B. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00510-1 · Cited by 143
The future of buyer–seller interactions: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Ahearne, M., Atefi, Y., Lam, S. K., & Pourmasoudi, M. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00803-0 · Cited by 184
Feelings as Information: Moods Influence Judgments and Processing Strategies
Schwarz, N. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.031 · Cited by 149
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Death Goes to the Polls: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Effects on Political Attitudes
Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12005 · Cited by 209
Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.988 · Cited by 152
Can Nonverbal Cues be Used to Make Meaningful Personality Attributions in Employment Interviews?
DeGroot, T., & Gooty, J. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9098-0 · Cited by 147
The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures
Białek, M., & Pennycook, G. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0963-x · Cited by 168
Kadous, K., Leiby, J., & Peecher, M. E. (2013) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50529 · Cited by 138
Partisanship in a Social Setting
Klar, S. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12087 · Cited by 290
Wojcieszak, M. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01436.x · Cited by 152
The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity
Phillips, L. T., & Lowery, B. S. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.008 · Cited by 142
Levy, N. L. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1477-x · Cited by 162
Medina, J., & Cason, S. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.021 · Cited by 155
Schaller, M. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.61 · Cited by 145
Hegarty, P. V., & Felicia Pratto, B. (2001) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1300/j082v41n01_04 · Cited by 145
Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., & Tham, S. M. (2020) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699019864680 · Cited by 145
“…fits within the argument that situations arise that motivate partisans to strategically seek out agreeable information (Garrett, 2009), especially when their political identity is challenged and they are looking to fortify their ideological beliefs to remain consistent and “right” (Kunda, 1990).”
BackgroundInfluentialReczek, R. W., Droms, C. M., & Haws, K. L. (2009) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.28.2.221 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunda, Z.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kunda, Ziva
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-498
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2149893809
- Cited by
- 9,022
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 542 · 2025: 609 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 583 · 2022: 640 · 2021: 606 · 2020: 642 · 2019: 631 · 2018: 483 · 2017: 372 · 2016: 331 · 2015: 321 · 2014: 299 · 2013: 231 · 2012: 258
- FWCI
- 23.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh042239-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH42239-01A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- motivated reasoning, motivation, belief evaluation, cognitive strategies, accuracy motivation, confirmation bias, justification
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Concept Formation, Humans, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review