The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for motivated reasoning.
Abstract
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective 55-58 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Khatun et al. (2022) and Ahsan et al. (2022) identify involuntary non-migrants in Bangladesh using retrospective, self-reported survey data, which run the risk of motivated reasoning (Kunda 1990).”
From Trapped by climate change? (In)voluntary immobility in Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“People may process information in a manner that is consistent with their partisan identities, prior beliefs, and motivations, a process known as motivated cognition (34–37).”
From Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The processing of false information is likely to be motivated by a confirmation bias (e.g., Hameleers et al., 2024): People are more likely to uncritically accept information when it reassures their worldviews and political attitudes, and critically scrutinize information when it does not confirm their existing worldviews (e.g., Kunda, 1990).”
From How persuasive are political cheapfakes disseminated via social media? The effects of out-of-context visual disinformation on message credibility and issue agreement (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Based on various theories, such as the theory of motivated reasoning, which explains that decisions are often based on pre-determined goals and desirability rather than an accurate reflection of the evidence (Kunda, 1990), researchers have identified a few individual variables that may motivate the person to believe misinformation they are exposed to.These include political orientation (Chen et al”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“the reason being people's motivated reasoning (Grossman, 2014; Kunda, 1990)-the tendency to interpret reality in a self-serving way.”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“It is proposed that there are two distinct but coexisting human motivations that account for citizens' choice and consumption of political information: directional vs. accuracy (Kunda, 1990, or defensive vs. accuracy in Hart et al., 2009, or cognitive consistency vs. understanding in Holbert et al., 2013).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The underlying reason for the reinforcing tendency of algorithms is that algorithms are naturally designed to operate with, not against, human tendencies, one of which is that people feel more comfortable with consistency and confirmation (Kunda, 1990).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Yet, given the human tendency toward psychological consistency (Kunda, 1990), cognitive salience of counter-attitudinal ideas in the user mind would not be strong enough to drive routine searches online.”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The self has a powerful need to see itself as having integrity, but it must do so within the constraints of reality (Adler 2012, Kunda 1990, Pennebaker & Chung 2011, Wilson 2011).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“One kind of less epistemically rational but more epistemically committal belief in AI consciousness may manifest when AI users continue to attribute consciousness to chatbots even when strong evidence suggests otherwise, because their reasoning processes are distorted by cognitive or motivational biases.”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“many motivationally biased beliefs aren't yet fully insulated from counterevidence but depend on what has been called an”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive–motivational, insofar as they involve the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition), as described in several classic social psychological theories88,96,97.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“It is also important to emphasize that many of these top-down influences occur automatically and without awareness (Kunda, 1990; Nickerson, 1998; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Thus, such use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that then can bias the observations and interpretation of the actual evidence”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 2×
“In several studies, incentives or admonitions to be accurate did not eliminate bias ( Fischhoff, 1977 ; Kahneman & Tversky, 1972a ; Lord, Lepper, & Preston, 1984 ; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 2×
“Bem (1972) argued that the findings could also result from self-perception: The subjects, who have limited direct ac-”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 9,025
A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments.
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.5 · Cited by 839
Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships.
Murray, S., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641 · Cited by 811
Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615 · Cited by 786
The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000586 · Cited by 852
Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M. B., Bhaskar, L. S., & Velury, U. K. (2012) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50350 · Cited by 788
Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask
Klayman, J., Soll, J. B., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C. C., & Barlas, S. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2847 · Cited by 787
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004 · Cited by 743
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M. B., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 · Cited by 770
MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM IN THE EVALUATION OF POLITICAL BELIEFS (2006)
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711019 · Cited by 760
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns
Piazza, J. R., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011 · Cited by 857
A metaphor-enriched social cognition.
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020970 · Cited by 804
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758
Franco‐Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001 · Cited by 755
Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior
Westaby, J. D. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003 · Cited by 823
On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses.
Fujita, K. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311411165 · Cited by 734
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3144139 · Cited by 1,222
Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information.
Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. M. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.5.861 · Cited by 739
The evolution and psychology of self-deception
von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. L. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10001354 · Cited by 767
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects
Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s002238161000006x · Cited by 736
Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K., & Sheldon, K. M. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0022575 · Cited by 720
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342 · Cited by 767
Why Do People Regulate Their Emotions? A Taxonomy of Motives in Emotion Regulation
Tamir, M. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868315586325 · Cited by 840
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12234 · Cited by 741
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 · Cited by 693
Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes
Smith, W. K. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0932 · Cited by 774
Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
Berinsky, A. J. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000186 · Cited by 511
The End of Framing as we Know it … and the Future of Media Effects
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811 · Cited by 704
Positive Illusions and Coping with Adversity
Taylor, S. E., & Armor, D. A. (1996) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00947.x · Cited by 723
Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894 · Cited by 690
What is social comparison and how should we study it?
Wood, J. V. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296225009 · Cited by 697
(Un)Ethical Behavior in Organizations
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745 · Cited by 794
The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation
Lodge, M. G., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082427 · Cited by 687
Dunning, D. A., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.020 · Cited by 689
A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing
Nelson, M. W. (2009) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1 · Cited by 675
The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school
Zimmerman, C. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001 · Cited by 749
On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal
Limón, M. (2001) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00037-2 · Cited by 715
Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611003 · Cited by 660
Information Avoidance: Who, What, When, and Why
Sweeny, K. M., Melnyk, D., Miller, W. A., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021288 · Cited by 651
The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest.
Gino, F., & Dan Ariely, C. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026406 · Cited by 740
Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379621 · Cited by 635
Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704882114 · Cited by 607
The Psychological Foundations of Culture
Harton, H. C., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2003) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410608994 · Cited by 638
The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information
Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G. F., & Seppi, D. J. (2009) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9060-6 · Cited by 608
The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases
Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3 · Cited by 838
Consumer resistance to innovation—a behavioral reasoning perspective
Claudy, M., Garcia, R., & O’Driscoll, A. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0 · Cited by 646
OSMUNDSEN, M., BOR, A., VAHLSTRUP, P. B., BECHMANN, A., & PETERSEN, M. B. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000290 · Cited by 614
“Cognitive psychologists have demonstrated the existence of two fundamentally different motivational goals that structure how individuals engage with information: Accuracy-oriented and goal-oriented motivations (the latter sometimes referred to as directional motivations) (Kunda 1990).”
BackgroundSocial Cognition and Social Perception
Fiske, S. T. (1993) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103 · Cited by 626
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 · Cited by 548
A Proposed Model of External Consumer Information Search
Schmidt, J. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1996) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070396243005 · Cited by 591
News media trust and its impact on media use: toward a framework for future research
Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, T. (2020) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338 · Cited by 740
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x · Cited by 588
When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self
Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611011 · Cited by 584
The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback
Aronson, E. (1992) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1 · Cited by 603
Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media
Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2024292118 · Cited by 560
Koch, A. J., D'Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036734 · Cited by 664
Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis
Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12360 · Cited by 634
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3680 · Cited by 587
The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x · Cited by 576
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
van der Linden, S. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6 · Cited by 570
DOES DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY WORK?
Ryfe, D. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633 · Cited by 590
Political diversity will improve social psychological science
Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14000430 · Cited by 604
Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037963 · Cited by 560
Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x · Cited by 574
Mele, A. R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/019515617x.001.0001 · Cited by 553
Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813 · Cited by 547
Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522 · Cited by 553
Self-citationHow voters decide: information processing during election campaigns
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2956 · Cited by 539
Weeks, B. E. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12164 · Cited by 531
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128 · Cited by 571
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320 · Cited by 533
Haidt, J. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x · Cited by 585
Self as Cultural Product: An Examination of East Asian and North American Selves
Heine, S. J. (2001) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696168 · Cited by 531
Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 · Cited by 707
Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches.
DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11503-000 · Cited by 535
Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219854600 · Cited by 522
Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K. A., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947 · Cited by 517
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557 · Cited by 725
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01559.x · Cited by 530
The Addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations.
Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443 · Cited by 541
Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation
Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12164 · Cited by 722
The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser‐Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1754 · Cited by 550
Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020463 · Cited by 515
The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments
Taber, C. S., Cann, D. M., & Kucsova, S. (2009) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8 · Cited by 465
The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.
Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001 · Cited by 634
Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309346065 · Cited by 504
Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003 · Cited by 615
Temperament and attention: orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1128 · Cited by 529
Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation
MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L. J., & Marcus, G. E. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x · Cited by 502
Why Do We Need What We Need? A Terror Management Perspective on the Roots of Human Social Motivation
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1997) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0801_1 · Cited by 497
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
Swire‐Thompson, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160802 · Cited by 542
Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.001501 · Cited by 509
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. M. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211424291 · Cited by 411
Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process.
Sedikides, C. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.317 · Cited by 710
Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.525 · Cited by 491
Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x · Cited by 543
A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness
Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4 · Cited by 503
The Concept of Mental Toughness: Tests of Dimensionality, Nomological Network, and Traitness
Gucciardi, D. F., Hanton, S., Gordon, S., Mallett, C. J., & Temby, P. (2014) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12079 · Cited by 620
The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12237 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunda, Z.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kunda, Ziva
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-498
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2149893809
- Cited by
- 9,022
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 542 · 2025: 609 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 583 · 2022: 640 · 2021: 606 · 2020: 642 · 2019: 631 · 2018: 483 · 2017: 372 · 2016: 331 · 2015: 321 · 2014: 299 · 2013: 231 · 2012: 258
- FWCI
- 23.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh042239-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH42239-01A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- motivated reasoning, motivation, belief evaluation, cognitive strategies, accuracy motivation, confirmation bias, justification
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Concept Formation, Humans, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
