Cited by 435Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioral vigilance following infusions of 192 IgG-saporin into the basal forebrain: selectivity of the behavioral impairment and relation to cortical AChE-positive fiber density

McGaughy, Jill, Kaiser, Tiffany, Sarter, Martin·1996·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Rats were trained in a previously validated behavioral vigilance task that required them to detect visual signals of variable length and to discriminate signal from nonsignal events. Baseline performance was characterized by a signal length-dependent ability to score hits, a decline in hits over time, and a correct rejection rate of approximately 70%. After the rats reached criterion performance in this task, the immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin or its vehicle was infused into the area of the nucleus basalis/substantia innominata of the basal forebrain. Postoperative performance in lesioned rats was characterized by a decrease in their ability to detect signals while their ability to correctly reject nonsignals remained unaffected. The effect of the lesion did not recover in the course of over 180 sessions of postlesion testing. The overall performance of the rats correlated with acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-positive fiber density in all cortical areas measured except the cingulate and pyriform cortex. These findings help to elucidate the nature of the attentional impairments resulting from the loss of cortical cholinergic inputs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.110.2.247

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 337

Metadata

Authors
McGaughy, J., Kaiser, T., & Sarter, M.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1996-04
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
247-265
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2075076974
Cited by
435
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 28 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag010173-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG10 173)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH01072, K02MH001072)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS32938, R01NS032938)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
192 IgG-saporin, nucleus basalis of Meynert, substantia innominata, basal forebrain, attentional impairment, signal detection, visual discrimination, lesion recovery, rats
MeSH terms
Saporins, Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Immunotoxins, Attention, Brain Mapping, Carbolines, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Male, N-Glycosyl Hydrolases, Rats, Inbred F344, Mental Recall, Substantia Innominata, Visual Perception, Prosencephalon, Cholinergic Agents, Rats, Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review