The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral vigilance following infusions of 192 IgG-saporin into the basal forebrain: selectivity of the behavioral impairment and relation to cortical AChE-positive fiber density
Abstract
Rats were trained in a previously validated behavioral vigilance task that required them to detect visual signals of variable length and to discriminate signal from nonsignal events. Baseline performance was characterized by a signal length-dependent ability to score hits, a decline in hits over time, and a correct rejection rate of approximately 70%. After the rats reached criterion performance in this task, the immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin or its vehicle was infused into the area of the nucleus basalis/substantia innominata of the basal forebrain. Postoperative performance in lesioned rats was characterized by a decrease in their ability to detect signals while their ability to correctly reject nonsignals remained unaffected. The effect of the lesion did not recover in the course of over 180 sessions of postlesion testing. The overall performance of the rats correlated with acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-positive fiber density in all cortical areas measured except the cingulate and pyriform cortex. These findings help to elucidate the nature of the attentional impairments resulting from the loss of cortical cholinergic inputs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In rodents, lesions of cholinergic inputs to the cortex impair tests of sustained attention, particularly across sensory modalities (McGaughy et al., 2002; McGaughy et al., 1996; Turchi and Sarter, 1997).”
From Acetylcholine as a Neuromodulator: Cholinergic Signaling Shapes Nervous System Function and Behavior (2012) · cites this paper as McGaughy et al., 1996
In the citing paper
“At the same time, this deafferentation did not affect the animals’ response accuracy in blank trials (i.e., the correct reporting of the absence of a cue).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as McGaughy et al, 1996
In the citing paper
“While intact animals detected over 70–80% of the longest (500 ms) cues, cortical cholinergic deafferentation reduced the detection rate for all cues to about 30%, with no recovery despite several months of daily post-surgery practice (McGaughy et al, 1996).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as McGaughy et al, 1996
In the citing paper
“Removal of cortical cholinergic inputs selectively and persistently impaired the animals’ detection rate (or number of hits). In contrast, response accuracy in blank trials remained completely spared.”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as McGaughy et al, 1996
In the citing paper
“As orienting is not necessary for detection, the residual hit rate following cortical cholinergic deafferentation (McGaughy et al, 1996) may have been due to detections that occurred without the facilitating benefits of attentional orienting.”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as McGaughy et al, 1996
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuropsychology of Anxiety
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522713.001.0001 · Cited by 1,953
Acetylcholine as a Neuromodulator: Cholinergic Signaling Shapes Nervous System Function and Behavior
Picciotto, M. R., Higley, M. J., & Mineur, Y. S. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036 · Cited by 1,404
“In rodents, lesions of cholinergic inputs to the cortex impair tests of sustained attention, particularly across sensory modalities (McGaughy et al., 1996, 2002; Turchi and Sarter, 1997).”
BackgroundCENTRAL CHOLINERGIC SYSTEMS AND COGNITION
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.649 · Cited by 1,348
The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry
Robbins, T. (2002) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7 · Cited by 1,282
The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up.
Sarter, M., Givens, B., & Bruno, J. P. (2001) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00044-3 · Cited by 1,194
Self-citationModes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition
Hasselmo, M. E., & Sarter, M. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.104 · Cited by 733
“As orienting is not necessary for detection, the residual hit rate after cortical cholinergic deafferentation (McGaughy et al, 1996) may have been because of detections that occurred without the facilitating benefits of attentional orienting.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationCognitive functions of cortical acetylcholine: toward a unifying hypothesis
Sarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (1997) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(96)00009-4 · Cited by 675
Self-citationAuld, D. S., Kornecook, T. J., Bastianetto, S., & Quirion, R. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00079-5 · Cited by 678
Sarter, M., Hasselmo, M. E., Bruno, J. P., & Givens, B. (2005) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.08.006 · Cited by 667
“There is now ample experimental evidence in support of the hypothesis that the integrity of cortical cholinergic inputs is necessary for normal attentional performance, and that such performance robustly activates cortical cholinergic inputs [3,29,32,33,39, 50,73,101,99,132,162,183,180,181].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrefrontal Acetylcholine Release Controls Cue Detection on Multiple Timescales
Parikh, V., Kozak, R., Martinez, V., & Sarter, M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.025 · Cited by 623
“…or the selective removal of the cortical cholinergic input system indicated the necessary role of this neuromodulator for attentional performance (Chiba et al., 1995; Dalley et al., 2004; McGaughy et al., 1996, 2000, 2002; Muir et al., 1992, 1994; Turchi and Sarter, 1997; Voytko et al., 1994).”
Self-citationMore attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort
Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., & Kozak, R. (2006) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.11.002 · Cited by 552
“…system represents an essential component of neuronal systems mediating attentional functions and capacities (Chiba et al., 1995; Dalley et al., 2001; Everitt and Robbins, 1997; McGaughy et al., 1996; 2000, 2002; Mesulam, 1990; Sarter and Bruno, 1997, 2000; Sarter et al., 1999, 2001; Voytko, 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHasselmo, M. E., & McGaughy, J. (2004) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(03)45015-2 · Cited by 525
“In all studies, the degree of attentional impairment was correlated with the extent of cortical deafferentation (McGaughy et al., 1996; McGaughy and Sarter, 1998; McGaughy et al., 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (1999) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00487-x · Cited by 417
Self-citationCholine transporters, cholinergic transmission and cognition
Sarter, M. F., & Parikh, V. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1588 · Cited by 400
Self-citationAcetylcholine, Aging, and Alzheimer's Disease
Muir, J. L. (1997) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00431-5 · Cited by 357
Thiele, A., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.008 · Cited by 350
“…from segregated populations in the central amygdala and the caudate nucleus (after Gielow and Zaborszky, 2017). selective attentional deficits, while sparing other cognitive functions such as learning and memory (Dalley et al., 2004; Gill et al., 2000; McGaughy et al., 1996; Voytko et al., 1994).”
BackgroundCognitive functions of the basal forebrain
Baxter, M. G., & Chiba, A. A. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80024-5 · Cited by 351
Meck, W. H., & Williams, C. L. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00069-1 · Cited by 324
“[65] McGaughy J, Kaiser T, Sarter M.”
Young, J. W., Powell, S. B., Risbrough, V. B., Marston, H. M., & Geyer, M. A. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.004 · Cited by 312
“Neither methylphenidate nor AChEIs improved performance in normal or basal forebrain lesioned rats (McGaughy et al., 1996; McGaughy & Sarter, 1998; McGaughy et al., 1999).”
The Nucleus Basalis Magnocellularis Cholinergic System: One Hundred Years of Progress
Wenk, G. L. (1997) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1006/nlme.1996.3757 · Cited by 284
Attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: What does it mean for learning and memory?
Sarter, M. F., Bruno, J. P., & Givens, B. S. (2003) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/s1074-7427(03)00070-4 · Cited by 283
Self-citationDalley, J. W., McGaughy, J., O'Connell, M. T., Cardinal, R. N., Levita, L., & Robbins, T. W. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-13-04908.2001 · Cited by 277
“Thus, lesions of the cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain produced using excitotoxins or the more selective cholinergic toxin 192-IgG saporin result in robust and persistent impairments in sustained attention (Muir et al., 1994; Voytko et al., 1994; McGaughy et al., 1996).”
Self-citationHenny, P., & Jones, B. E. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06029.x · Cited by 266
“Lesions of cholinergic BF neurons have been associated with decreased amplitude of theta and gamma activity (Lee et al., 1994; McGaughy et al., 1996; Gerashchenko et al., 2001; Berntson et al., 2002), yet not to the extent that non-specific lesions or inactivation of the total BF cell population had previously been sh…”
BackgroundIncreases in cortical acetylcholine release during sustained attention performance in rats
Himmelheber, A. M., Sarter, M., & Bruno, J. P. (2000) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00012-4 · Cited by 261
Self-citationDecreased neurogenesis after cholinergic forebrain lesion in the adult rat
Cooper‐Kuhn, C. M., Winkler, J., & Kuhn, H. G. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.20116 · Cited by 270
“It has been shown previously that a single injection of 192IgG-saporin results in a complete and selective loss of ChATimmunoreactive neurons in the basal forebrain, long-lasting cortical cholinergic hypoactivity, and deficits in attention, learning, and memory tasks (Berger-Sweeney et al., 1994; Heckers et al., 1994;…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMcGaughy, J., Ross, R. S., & Eichenbaum, H. (2008) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.064 · Cited by 226
“…the neurochemical basis of attention have found that both norepinephrine (NE) and acetylcholine (ACh) mediate aspects of attention (McGaughy and Sarter, 1995b; McGaughy et al., 1996; Rajkowski et al., 2004; Milstein et al., 2007) but some conditions dissociate the functions of these systems.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGill, T. M., Sarter, M., & Givens, B. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-12-04745.2000 · Cited by 228
“…demonstrated that the selective loss of corticopetal cholinergic projections is sufficient to produce impairments in attention (Chiba et al., 1995, 1999; Bucci et al., 1998), especially in sustained (McGaughy et al., 1996; McGaughy and Sarter, 1998) and divided attention (Turchi and Sarter, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationAnxiety and cardiovascular reactivity: the basal forebrain cholinergic link
Berntson, G. G., Sarter, M. F., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00041-2 · Cited by 225
“Several lines of evidence, including in vivo measures of cortical ACh release in task-performing animals [225] and investigations of the cognitive effects of lesions of this system [166], collectively suggested a crucial role of cortical ACh in the detection and selection of relevant stimuli and in the capacity to sub…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPassetti, F., Dalley, J. W., O’Connell, M. T., Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2000) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00183.x · Cited by 223
Conner, J. M., Chiba, A. A., & Tuszynski, M. H. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.003 · Cited by 223
Modulators in concert for cognition: Modulator interactions in the prefrontal cortex
Briand, L. A., Gritton, H., Howe, W. M., Young, D. A., & Sarter, M. (2007) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.06.007 · Cited by 216
“Infusions of this cholinotoxin into the nbM/SI or cortical regions results in persistent and robust deficits in attentional performance, specifically impairing animals’ ability to detect cues indicative of reward (McGaughy et al., 1996; McGaughy and Sarter, 1998; Turchi and Sarter, 1997, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSex‐specific mechanisms for responding to stress
Bangasser, D. A., & Wicks, B. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.23812 · Cited by 208
“This circuit includes cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain region of the nucleus basalis of Meynet (nbM) that project to the cortex (McGaughy et al., 1996; Sarter et al., 2001).”
Cortical cholinergic signaling controls the detection of cues
Gritton, H. J., Howe, W. M., Mallory, C. S., Hetrick, V. L., Berke, J. D., & Sarter, M. F. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516134113 · Cited by 191
“Conversely, silencing cholinergic activity reduced hit rates to long cues, consistent with effects of cholinergic lesions (9).”
BackgroundSelf-citationArnold, H. M., Burk, J. A., Hodgson, E. M., Sarter, M., & Bruno, J. P. (2002) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00292-0 · Cited by 195
“Similarly, using an operant task designed to measure sustained attention performance, McGaughy et al. (1996) demonstrated that the loss of cortical cholinergic inputs produced by infusions of the selective cholinergic immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin into the basal forebrain decreases animals’ ability…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAcetylcholine in cortical inference
Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00058-8 · Cited by 195
Cholinergic modulation of cognitive processing: insights drawn from computational models
Newman, E. L., Gupta, K., Climer, J. R., Monaghan, C. K., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2012) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00024 · Cited by 196
“Using this approach, McGaughy et al. (1996) found that selective cholinergic deafferentation of cortex, by infusing 192 IgG-saporin into the nucleus basalis/substantia innominata of the basal forebrain, of rats previously trained on the SAT elicited selective deficits in stimulus detection.”
BackgroundSeptohippocampal Acetylcholine: Involved in but not Necessary for Learning and Memory?Preprint
Parent, M. B., & Baxter, M. G. (2004) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.69104 · Cited by 194
“Lesions of corticopetal cholinergic projections (from the NBM) also often impair performance on a variety of attentional tasks (McGaughy et al. 1996, 2002; Lehmann et al. 2003) without substantially affecting memory (e.g., Baxter et al. 1995; Dornan et al. 1996; Galani et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMethodChanges in Acetylcholine Extracellular Levels During Cognitive Processes: Table 1.Preprint
Pepeu, G., & Giovannini, M. G. (2004) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.68104 · Cited by 193
“Most of the studies report disrupted attentional processing in NBor MS-injected animals (McGaughy et al. 1996; Wrenn andWiley 1998), thus confirming the role of the cholinergic system in attention.”
BackgroundNeuromodulation by acetylcholine: examples from schizophrenia and depression
Higley, M. J., & Picciotto, M. R. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.004 · Cited by 184
Sex differences in stress reactivity in arousal and attention systems
Bangasser, D. A., Eck, S. R., & Sanchez, E. O. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0137-2 · Cited by 192
Reduction of Brain Kynurenic Acid Improves Cognitive Function
Kozak, R., Campbell, B. M., Strick, C. A., Horner, W., Hoffmann, W. E., Kiss, T., Chapin, D. S., McGinnis, D. J., Abbott, A. L., Roberts, B. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1107-14.2014 · Cited by 182
“This operant procedure consists of a random sequence of signal and nonsignal events followed by a variable intertrial interval (ITI), as described in detail by McGaughy et al. (1996).”
MethodCholinergic Mediation of Attention
Parikh, V., & Sarter, M. F. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1417.021 · Cited by 181
Self-citationCell type-specific long-range connections of basal forebrain circuit
Do, J. P. H., Xu, M., Lee, S., Chang, W.-C., Zhang, S., Chung, S., Yung, T. J., Fan, J. L., Miyamichi, K., Luo, L., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.13214 · Cited by 172
“For example, 192-IgG-saporin-mediated lesion of cholinergic neurons impaired the ability of rats to discriminate between signal and non-signal visual events in an attention task (McGaughy et al., 1996) and disrupted training-induced cortical map reorganization associated with motor learning”
BackgroundTurchi, J. N., & Sarter, M. F. (1997) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(97)00027-x · Cited by 165
Self-citationSarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01289-2 · Cited by 161
Self-citationMcGaughy, J. A., Everitt, B. J., Robbins, T. W., & Sarter, M. F. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00262-x · Cited by 161
Self-citationCholinergic enhancement modulates neural correlates of selective attention and emotional processing
Bentley, P., Vuilleumier, P. O., Thiel, C. M., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00302-1 · Cited by 157
“Cholinergic inputs to frontoparietal cortex have been associated with performance on sustained and selective attention tasks (McGaughy et al., 1996; Himmelheber et al., 2001), with attention-correlated-neural activity (Gill et al.”
BackgroundBaxter, M. G., Holland, P. C., & Gallagher, M. (1997) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-13-05230.1997 · Cited by 155
“The present results, taken together with other data (Muir et al., 1994; Chiba et al., 1995, 1997; McGaughy et al., 1996), indicate that specific deficits in attentional processing result from selective destruction of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons.”
ResultCortical Cholinergic Transmission and Cortical Information Processing in Schizophrenia
Sarter, M. (2005) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi006 · Cited by 153
“…the selective decrease in the animals' ability to detect signals (i.e., hits) that results from lesions of the cortical cholinergic input system (McGaughy et al. 1996; McGaughy and Sarter 1998), from infusions of a BZR agonist or an NMDA receptor antagonist into the BF (Holley et al. 1995;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHowe, W. M., Ji, J., Parikh, V., Williams, S., Mocaër, E., Trocmé-Thibierge, C., & Sarter, M. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.9 · Cited by 150
“Cholinergic activity is necessary for the performance of attention tasks (e.g., McGaughy et al , 1996; for review see Sarter et al., 2005, 2006).”
Howe, W. M., Gritton, H. J., Lusk, N. A., Roberts, E. A., Hetrick, V. L., Berke, J. D., & Sarter, M. F. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2737-16.2017 · Cited by 155
“The detection of cues in attentional contexts depends on cholinergic activity in the cortex (McGaughy et al., 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (2004) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.11.011 · Cited by 150
“For example, selective loss of cortical cholinergic inputs, produced by infusions of 192 IgG-saporin into the basal forebrain or the cortex, results in impairments in a wide range of attentional abilities, ranging from sustained attention to divided attention [110,206].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAugmented Prefrontal Acetylcholine Release during Challenged Attentional Performance
Kozak, R., Bruno, J. P., & Sarter, M. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi079 · Cited by 144
Self-citationJacobsen, L. K., Slotkin, T. A., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2007) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301398 · Cited by 144
“Earlier work has shown that increases in cortical cholinergic neurotransmission enhance the selectivity of perceptual processing (Furey et al, 2000; McGaughy et al, 1996; McGaughy and Sarter, 1998; Sarter et al, 2005), and improve the efficiency (reduce activation) of brain regions supporting…”
BackgroundAfferents to anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and midcingulate areas 24a′ and 24b′ in the mouse
Fillinger, C., Yalçın, İ., Barrot, M., & Veinante, P. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1290-1 · Cited by 144
Control of arousal by the orexin neurons
Alexandre, C., Andermann, M. L., & Scammell, T. E. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.04.008 · Cited by 146
“For example, cortical release of acetylcholine is greatest during demanding attention tasks [74] and cholinergic SI neurons have been shown to play a role in sustained [75] and divided attention [76] in rats.”
BackgroundNewman, L. A., Darling, J., & McGaughy, J. (2008) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1097-8 · Cited by 137
“Histological analyses DBH-positive fibers were quantified in cortical areas in a manner modified from that described by McGaughy et al. (1996).”
Self-citationParikh, V., Ji, J., Decker, M. W., & Sarter, M. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5712-09.2010 · Cited by 133
“Cholinergic drugs modulate attentional performance and the activity of brain regions mediating attention (McGaughy et al., 1996; Turchi and Sarter 1997; Arnold et al., 2002; Sarter et al., 2005; Kozak et al., 2006, 2007; Bentley et al., 2008; Furey et al., 2008; Deco and Thiele, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrefrontal cortical modulation of acetylcholine release in posterior parietal cortex
Nelson, C. L., Sarter, M., & Bruno, J. P. (2005) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.007 · Cited by 128
“…(ACh) in cortex results in arked performance deficits in tasks explicitly designed to ax attentional processing (McGaughy and Sarter, 1998; cGaughy et al., 1996, 2002; Turchi and Sarter, 1997). oreover, performance in such tasks is sufficient to stimulate ortical ACh release (Arnold et…”
BackgroundSelf-citationMcGaughy, J., Decker, M. W., & Sarter, M. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050991 · Cited by 128
Self-citationParikh, V., Man, K., Decker, M. W., & Sarter, M. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5251-07.2008 · Cited by 127
“Because of evidence indicating that cortical ACh release mediates attentional performance (McGaughy et al., 1996; Gill et al., 2000; Dalley et al., 2004; Apparsundaram et al., 2005; Sarter et al., 2005, 2006; Kozak et al., 2006; Parikh et al., 2007), the enhancement of attentional functions and capacities by nAChR ago…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHowe, W. M., Berry, A. S., François, J., Gilmour, G., Carp, J., Tricklebank, M. D., Lustig, C., & Sarter, M. F. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5809-12.2013 · Cited by 136
“Despite being tethered while performing the SAT, rats exhibited typical levels of performance.”
InfluentialSelf-citationCholine acetyltransferase activity and cognitive domain scores of Alzheimer's patients.
Pappas, B., Bayley, P., Bui, B. K., Hansen, L., & Thal, L. (2000) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00090-7 · Cited by 122
nAChR agonist-induced cognition enhancement: Integration of cognitive and neuronal mechanisms
Sarter, M., Parikh, V., & Howe, W. M. (2009) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.04.019 · Cited by 123
“Following the validation of the immunotoxin 192-IgG-saporin as a tool for selectively removing the cortical cholinergic input system [62], several experiments demonstrated that such deafferentation selectively impairs the detection of signals in the SAT and similar tasks [63,64].”
Self-citationCNTRICS final animal model task selection: Control of attention
Lustig, C., Kozak, R., Sarter, M. F., Young, J. W., & Robbins, T. W. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.05.009 · Cited by 122
“…systems and other variables (e.g., gonadal steroids) in signal detection and vigilance (Briand et al., 2008; McGaughy & Sarter 1995, 1998, 1999; McGaughy et al., 1996; 1997,1999, 2000; Turchi et al.,1995, 1996; Turchi & Sarter 2001a,b; Himmelheber et al. 2000a,b, 2001; Holley et al., 1995;…”
Self-citationRollema, H., Hajós, M., Seymour, P. A., Kozak, R., Majchrzak, M. J., Guanowsky, V., Horner, W. E., Chapin, D. S., Hoffmann, W. E., Johnson, D. E., et al. (2009) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.033 · Cited by 118
Sarter, M. F., Albin, R. L., Kucinski, A. J., & Lustig, C. (2014) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.032 · Cited by 117
“Cholinergic lesions disrupt sustained, selective and divided attention performance (Bucci et al., 1998; Dalley et al., 2004; McGaughy et al., 1996) and impair performance involving ns in the intact brain (a), and following the dual loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons d to provide a…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02004.x · Cited by 113
“Such selective lesions of the BF cholinergic system were repeatedly demonstrated to result in a decrease in the animals' ability to detect a range of visual signals but not to affect their conditioned response to nonsignal trials (e.g. McGaughy et al., 1996; McGaughy & Sarter, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe behavioral functions of the cholinergic basalforebrain : lessons from 192 IgG‐SAPORIN
Wrenn, C. C., & Wiley, R. G. (1998) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0736-5748(98)00071-9 · Cited by 112
Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior
Sarter, M. F., & Lustig, C. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1305-19.2019 · Cited by 118
“, 2016) demonstrated that cholinergic transients cause behavior: optogenetic inhibition of transients during signal trials reduced hits, but did not affect correct rejections, similar to the effects of cholinergic lesions (McGaughy et al., 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSarter, M. F., Bruno, J. P., & Turchi, J. N. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09277.x · Cited by 110
Self-citationTowart, L. A., Alves, S. E., Znamensky, V., Hayashi, S., McEwen, B. S., & Milner, T. A. (2003) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10753 · Cited by 109
“One of the primary functions of the cholinergic septohippocampal projection is attention, including vigilance, arousal, and expectancy (McGaughy et al., 1996; Muir, 1997; Baxter et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMcGaughy, J. A., Koene, R. A., Eichenbaum, H., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2386-05.2005 · Cited by 105
“Rats were randomly assigned to receive the immunotoxin 192 IgGsaporin (Advanced Targeting Systems, San Diego, CA) or its vehicle, Dulbecco's saline infused into the region of the entorhinal cortex, using previously published surgical techniques (McGaughy et al., 1996).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationAttention and memory in aged rats: Impact of lifelong environmental enrichment.
Harati, H., Majchrzak, M., Cosquer, B., Galani, R., Kelche, C., Cassel, J., & Barbelivien, A. (2011) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.03.012 · Cited by 94
“…are known to be preferentially sensitive to cholinergic lterations in the basalo-cortical system (e.g., Harati et al., 008; Lehmann et al., 2003; McGaughy et al., 1996, 2002) nd the decline of attention processes with age may be related, t least partially, to a neuronal loss/dysfunction in this…”
BackgroundThe role of the extrapersonal brain systems in religious activity
Previc, F. H. (2006) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.009 · Cited by 107
Demeter, E., Hernández-García, L., Sarter, M. F., & Lustig, C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.026 · Cited by 107
“…of the frontal– parietal cholinergic system via drug or deafferentiation has dramatic effects on performance and interacts with the distractor (e.g., McGaughy et al., 1996; Parikh et al., 2007; Broussard et al., 2009; Howe and Sarter, 2010), suggesting that while performance-and challenge-related…”
Self-citationRats and humans paying attention: Cross-species task development for translational research.
Demeter, E., Sarter, M. F., & Lustig, C. (2008) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0013712 · Cited by 116
“Similar floor effects at shorter signal durations following an attentional challenge were previously reported on this task in rats (e.g., McGaughy et al., 1996;Kozak et al., 2006), suggesting the 500 ms duration may be the most useful to examine when considering manipulations that decrease hit…”
Self-citationLehmann, O., Grottick, A. J., Cassel, J., & Higgins, G. A. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02745.x · Cited by 104
“…may however, wonder whether the AChE-staining technique is specific enough to account for cholinergic denervation, particularly in the medial prefrontal, cingulate and retrosplenial cortices (see studies based on this method; Holley et al., 1994; McGaughy et al., 1996; Turchi & Sarter, 1997, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSarter, M., Bruno, J. P., & Parikh, V. (2007) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301285 · Cited by 100
“Contrasting effects on release were found in animals performing a task, which taxes attentional functions and is known to depend on the integrity and activity of the cortical cholinergic input system (Arnold et al, 2002; McGaughy et al, 1996 ).”
Self-citationDeterministic functions of cortical acetylcholine
Sarter, M. F., Lustig, C., Howe, W. M., Gritton, H. J., & Berry, A. S. (2014) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12515 · Cited by 104
“to guide decisions about ongoing behavior (Muir et al., 1992; McGaughy et al., 1996; Turchi & Sarter, 1997; Dalley et al., 2004; Botly & De Rosa, 2009).”
Self-citationWrenn, C. C., Harris, A. P., Saavedra, M. C., et al. (2003) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.21 · Cited by 99
Saporito, M. S., Hudkins, R. L., & Maroney, A. C. (2002) · Progress in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0079-6468(08)70081-x · Cited by 99
Central blockade of muscarinic cholinergic receptors disrupts affective and attentional set‐shifting
Chen, K. C., Baxter, M. G., & Rodefer, J. S. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03548.x · Cited by 97
“…the systemic scopolamine data, it might be concluded that set-shifting is not regulated by central acetylcholine, based on the absence of cholinergic lesion effects on attentional set-shifting relative to impairments in other aspects of attention following such lesions (e.g. McGaughy et al., 1996).”
BackgroundKim, C. H., Hvoslef‐Eide, M., Nilsson, S. R. O., Johnson, M. R., Herbert, B. R., Robbins, T. W., Saksida, L. M., Bussey, T. J., & Mar, A. C. (2015) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-015-4081-0 · Cited by 95
“The 5-CSRTT and the SATwere originally developed for rats and are well-validated based on a wealth of data examining its behavioural, neural and pharmacological underpinnings (Carli et al. 1983; McGaughy et al. 1996; Lustig et al. 2013).”
BackgroundAnimal Models of Schizophrenia
Young, J. W., Zhou, X., & Geyer, M. A. (2010) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2010_62 · Cited by 97
Wrenn, C. C., Lappi, D. A., & Wiley, R. G. (1999) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02099-5 · Cited by 94
Rezvani, A., Kholdebarin, E., Brucato, F., Callahan, P., Lowe, D., & Levin, E. (2009) · Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.11.018 · Cited by 97
“Similar observations have beenmade in rats with cortical cholinergic lesions (McGaughy et al., 1996; Sarter et al., 2001).”
The effects of manipulations of attentional demand on cortical acetylcholine release
Himmelheber, A. M., Sarter, M. F., & Bruno, J. P. (2001) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00064-7 · Cited by 94
Self-citationBerntson, G. G., Shafi, R., & Sarter, M. F. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02310.x · Cited by 93
“These ®ndings are also in accord with previous studies that report behavioural effects of intrabasalis 192 IgG-saporin only after fairly extensive cholinergic degeneration (McGaughy et al., 1996).”
MethodResultSelf-citationLesions of the Amygdala Central Nucleus Alter Performance on a Selective Attention Task
Holland, P. C., Han, J., & Gallagher, M. (2000) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-17-06701.2000 · Cited by 90
“Other research demonstrates a role for the BF cholinergic system in the regulation of attentional processes engaged in sustained or selective attention tasks (Muir et al., 1992; Pang et al., 1993; Voytko et al., 1994; McGaughy et al., 1996; Chiba et al., 1999).”
BackgroundSilvestrini, N., Musslick, S., Berry, A. S., & Vassena, E. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000372 · Cited by 96
Ramanathan, D., Tuszynski, M. H., & Conner, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0230-09.2009 · Cited by 89
“Indeed, previous studies have indicated that the basal forebrain cholinergic system becomes most relevant in tasks in which attentional load is increased (McGaughy et al., 1996; Turchi and Sarter, 1997).”
ResultMcAuley, J. D., Stewart, A. L., Webber, E. S., Cromwell, H. C., Servatius, R. J., & Pang, K. C. H. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.036 · Cited by 94
Berger-Sweeney, J. E. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00070-8 · Cited by 88
CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Control of Attention
Nuechterlein, K. H., Luck, S. J., Lustig, C., & Sarter, M. F. (2008) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn158 · Cited by 90
Self-citationSiesser, W. B., Zhao, J., Miller, L. R., Cheng, S.-Y., & McDonald, M. P. (2005) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00161.x · Cited by 88
“Sustained attention (simple reaction time) Sustained attention was assessed using modifications of previously published procedures (McGaughy & Sarter 1995; McGaughy et al. 1996, 1997; McDonald et al. 1998; McGaughy & Sarter 1999).”
MethodSelective removal of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain alters cued target detection
Chiba, A. A., Bushnell, P. J., Oshiro, W. M., & Gallagher, M. (1999) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199909290-00044 · Cited by 83
Orexin/hypocretin modulation of the basal forebrain cholinergic system: Role in attention
Fadel, J. R., & Burk, J. A. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.046 · Cited by 89
“For example, accuracy of visual signal detection is decreased in attention-demanding tasks following loss of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic neurons (McGaughy et al., 2002, 1996).”
BackgroundRole of the locus coeruleus and basal forebrain in arousal and attention
Maness, E. B., Burk, J. A., McKenna, J. T., Schiffino, F. L., Strecker, R. E., & McCoy, J. G. (2022) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.07.014 · Cited by 89
McDonald, M. P., Wong, R. S. L., Goldstein, G. B., Weintraub, B. D., Cheng, S.-Y., & Crawley, J. N. (1998) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.5.4.289 · Cited by 84
“The go/no-go task is a variation of the signaldetection paradigm that is used commonly to assesses both sustained attention (vigilance) and impulsivity in humans (Zahn et al. 1980, 1991) and animals (McGaughy and Sarter 1995a,b; McGaughy et al. 1996, 1997).”
Metadata
- Authors
- McGaughy, J., Kaiser, T., & Sarter, M.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-265
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- OpenAlex
- W2075076974
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 28 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag010173-10)
- National Institute on Aging (AG10 173)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH01072, K02MH001072)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS32938, R01NS032938)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- 192 IgG-saporin, nucleus basalis of Meynert, substantia innominata, basal forebrain, attentional impairment, signal detection, visual discrimination, lesion recovery, rats
- MeSH terms
- Saporins, Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Immunotoxins, Attention, Brain Mapping, Carbolines, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Male, N-Glycosyl Hydrolases, Rats, Inbred F344, Mental Recall, Substantia Innominata, Visual Perception, Prosencephalon, Cholinergic Agents, Rats, Ribosome Inactivating Proteins, Type 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review