The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science
Abstract
People can make decisions to join a group based solely on exposure to that group's physical environment. Four studies demonstrate that the gender difference in interest in computer science is influenced by exposure to environments associated with computer scientists. In Study 1, simply changing the objects in a computer science classroom from those considered stereotypical of computer science (e.g., Star Trek poster, video games) to objects not considered stereotypical of computer science (e.g., nature poster, phone books) was sufficient to boost female undergraduates' interest in computer science to the level of their male peers. Further investigation revealed that the stereotypical broadcast a masculine stereotype that discouraged women's sense of ambient belonging and subsequent interest in the environment (Studies 2, 3, and 4) but had no similar effect on men (Studies 3, 4). This masculine stereotype prevented women's interest from developing even in environments entirely populated by other women (Study 2). Objects can thus come to broadcast stereotypes of a group, which in turn can deter people who do not identify with these stereotypes from joining that group.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One study, for instance, found that the presence of cues aligned with the stereotype of male computer scientists-geeky posters and video games-in a computer science classroom had a negative effect on women's performance (Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009).”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009
In the citing paper
“Stereotype threat can also undermine women's sense of belonging in a field and their motivation and desire to pursue success within the field (Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009
In the citing paper
“For example, women who were exposed to stereotypically masculine items in their environment, including a Star Trek poster and video games, reported less interest in pursuing computer science than those not exposed to the gendered environment (Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Cheryan, Plaut, Davies, & Steele, 2009
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Self-citationThe measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Self-citationWhat Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited.
Feldman, K. A., & Astin, A. W. (1994) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2943781 · Cited by 5,728
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027143 · Cited by 1,312
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationWang, M., & Degol, J. L. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x · Cited by 1,418
Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026659 · Cited by 1,113
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework.
Montoya, A. K., & Hayes, A. F. (2016) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000086 · Cited by 1,004
Math–Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children
Dario Cvencek, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x · Cited by 811
Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality.
Gaucher, D. M., Friesen, J. P., & Kay, A. C. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022530 · Cited by 800
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049 · Cited by 646
Self-citationConsumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105 · Cited by 668
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000061 · Cited by 662
Self-citationWalton, G. M., Logel, C. R., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037461 · Cited by 613
Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?
Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050 · Cited by 553
“When discussing reasons for leaving STEM, many students, particularly students of color and women, describe feelings of isolation and lack of belonging (Hewlett et al., 2008; Cheryan et al., 2009; Strayhorn, 2011).”
BackgroundBehavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution
Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3 · Cited by 599
Mere Belonging: The Power of Social Connections
Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025731 · Cited by 543
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x · Cited by 522
Self-citationGender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM
Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24631 · Cited by 553
Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611405218 · Cited by 503
Self-citationShapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0 · Cited by 501
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613117114 · Cited by 557
Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025199 · Cited by 526
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214549471 · Cited by 471
Dasgupta, N. (2011) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2011.607313 · Cited by 466
Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership
Hoyt, C. L., & Murphy, S. E. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002 · Cited by 454
Intervening within and across levels: A multilevel approach to stigma and public health
Cook, J. E., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Meyer, I. H., & Busch, J. T. A. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.023 · Cited by 438
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659 · Cited by 514
"What about me?" Perceptions of exclusion and whites' reactions to multiculturalism.
Plaut, V., Garnett, F. G., Buffardi, L. E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022832 · Cited by 388
Self-citationPresumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures.
Kaiser, C. R., Major, B., Jurcevic, I., Dover, T. L., Brady, L. M., & Shapiro, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030838 · Cited by 405
Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314564789 · Cited by 440
Beyer, S. (2014) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2014.963363 · Cited by 427
Fox, J., & Tang, W. Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014 · Cited by 361
Diversity Science: Why and How Difference Makes a Difference
Plaut, V. C. (2010) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478401003676501 · Cited by 398
Self-citationDiekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316642141 · Cited by 392
Schmader, T., & Sedikides, C. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734080 · Cited by 370
Shattering the Myth of Separate Worlds: Negotiating Nonwork Identities at Work
Ramarajan, L., & Reid, E. M. (2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0314 · Cited by 332
Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study
Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., Floyd-Smith, T., Bates, R., & Plett, M. (2015) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x · Cited by 336
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2100030118 · Cited by 356
Self-citationThe Effects of a Female Role Model on Academic Performance and Persistence of Women in STEM Courses
Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757 · Cited by 321
Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004 · Cited by 287
Self-citationDrury, B. J., Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2011) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2011.620935 · Cited by 288
Self-citationKong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026 · Cited by 277
Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions
Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0475-18.2019 · Cited by 351
Barbulescu, R., & Bidwell, M. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0757 · Cited by 275
Gender Gaps in Achievement and Participation in Multiple Introductory Biology Classrooms
Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204 · Cited by 281
Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non‐STEM student engagement
Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. E. (2016) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12371 · Cited by 303
Burnette, J. L., Pollack, J. M., Forsyth, R. B., Hoyt, C. L., Babij, A. D., Thomas, F. N., & Coy, A. E. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719864293 · Cited by 264
Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science
Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306 · Cited by 261
Enduring Influence of Stereotypical Computer Science Role Models on Women’s Academic Aspirations
Cheryan, S., Drury, B. J., & Vichayapai, M. (2012) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684312459328 · Cited by 260
Self-citationSmith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212468332 · Cited by 256
Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest
Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x · Cited by 271
Self-citationSchinske, J. N., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., & Wyer, M. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0002 · Cited by 247
Leveraging Mindsets to Promote Academic Achievement
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615599383 · Cited by 301
Dumas, T. L., & Sanchez‐Burks, J. (2015) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2015.1028810 · Cited by 236
Joshi, A. (2014) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839214528331 · Cited by 251
Tellhed, U., Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2016) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y · Cited by 272
Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Ito, T. A. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020110 · Cited by 261
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory ApproachPreprint
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2840975 · Cited by 221
Using Learning Analytics to Understand the Learning Pathways of Novice Programmers
Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Smith, C. P., & Davis, D. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.836655 · Cited by 217
Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2017) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684317720186 · Cited by 224
Women at Work: Pathways from Gender Stereotypes to Gender Bias and Discrimination
Heilman, M. E., Caleo, S., & Manzi, F. (2023) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-034105 · Cited by 294
Sex Differences in Spatial Cognition: Advancing the Conversation
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1380 · Cited by 209
Designing Classrooms to Maximize Student Achievement
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214548677 · Cited by 206
Self-citationEmerson, K. T. U., & Murphy, M. C. (2014) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035403 · Cited by 234
Phillips, L. T., Stephens, N. K., Townsend, S. S. M., & Goudeau, S. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000234 · Cited by 208
Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM
Thébaud, S., & Charles, M. (2018) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci7070111 · Cited by 210
Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering.
Smith, J. L., Cech, E. A., Metz, A. M., Huntoon, M. I., & Moyer, C. (2014) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036945 · Cited by 202
Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., Nuttall, A. K., Roseth, C. J., & Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000567 · Cited by 201
Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework
Heilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218761587 · Cited by 237
When He Doesn’t Mean You : Gender-Exclusive Language as Ostracism
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211406434 · Cited by 244
Dahl, J. L., Vescio, T. K., & Weaver, K. S. (2015) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000248 · Cited by 219
Canetto, S. S., & Chen, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.042 · Cited by 194
Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation
Chen, Y., Li, S. X., Liu, T. X., & Shih, M. J. (2014) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.002 · Cited by 186
Casad, B. J., Petzel, Z. W., & Ingalls, E. A. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0942-4 · Cited by 232
Sax, L. J., Blaney, J. M., Lehman, K. J., Rodriguez, S. L., George, K. L., & Zavala, C. (2018) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci7080122 · Cited by 191
Stereotype threat in organizations: implications for equity and performance
Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322 · Cited by 184
My Fair Physicist? Feminine Math and Science Role Models Demotivate Young Girls
Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612440735 · Cited by 184
Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities
Bian, L., Leslie, S., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006 · Cited by 201
Novice Programmers and Introductory Programming
Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.013 · Cited by 191
Robnett, R. D. (2015) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684315596162 · Cited by 206
Gender Inclusion and Fit in STEM
Schmader, T. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-043052 · Cited by 217
Correll, S. J. (2017) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243217738518 · Cited by 193
Using implicit bias training to improve attitudes toward women in STEM
Jackson, S. M., Hillard, A. L., & Schneider, T. R. (2014) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9259-5 · Cited by 177
Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation
Carr, P. B., & Walton, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.015 · Cited by 187
Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. L. (2013) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9232-8 · Cited by 189
The Development of Social Categorization
Rhodes, M., & Baron, A. S. (2019) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084824 · Cited by 201
Gender Bias Produces Gender Gaps in STEM Engagement
Moss‐Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C. M., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z · Cited by 180
Starr, C. R. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318793848 · Cited by 192
Beyond Social Contagion: Associative Diffusion and the Emergence of Cultural Variation
Goldberg, A., & Stein, S. K. (2018) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418797576 · Cited by 160
Steinke, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716 · Cited by 158
Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: An intersectional approach.
O’Brien, L. T., Blodorn, A., Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., & Hammer, E. D. (2014) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037944 · Cited by 201
Cultural Stereotypes and Sense of Belonging Contribute to Gender Gaps in STEM.
Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2020) · International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology · Cited by 156
Engage Me: The Mature-Age Worker and Stereotype Threat
Kulik, C. T., Perera, S. S., & Cregan, C. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0564 · Cited by 165
Huang, W., & Looi, C. (2020) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411 · Cited by 155
The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM
Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6 · Cited by 152
Plaza, M., Boiché, J., Brunel, L., & Ruchaud, F. (2016) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0650-x · Cited by 151
Lewis, C. M., Anderson, R. E., & Yasuhara, K. (2016) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/2960310.2960332 · Cited by 160
London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614166 · Cited by 154
O’Brien, L. T., BART, H. L. J., & Garcia, D. M. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09538-x · Cited by 152
Fisher, A. J., Mendoza‐Denton, R., Patt, C., Young, I., Eppig, A., Garrell, R. L., Rees, D. C., Nelson, T. W., & Richards, M. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209279 · Cited by 159
Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver‐Linn, E. (2011) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1045-1060
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2056648275
- Cited by
- 1,372
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 47.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Keywords
- gender stereotypes, gender gap in computing, stereotype threat, women in technology, gendered objects, female undergraduates
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Computers, Cues, Environment, Female, Gender Identity, Georgia, Group Processes, Humans, Male, Social Identification, Social Perception, Stereotyped Behavior, Stereotyping, Students, Organizational Culture, Informatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review