Cited by 5,292Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 312 of the 315 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 150 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The interpersonal theory of suicide.

Open access
Van Orden, Kimberly A., Witte, Tracy K., Cukrowicz, Kelly C., Braithwaite, Scott R., Selby, Edward A., Joiner, Thomas E.·2010·Psychological Review

Abstract

Suicidal behavior is a major problem worldwide and, at the same time, has received relatively little empirical attention. This relative lack of empirical attention may be due in part to a relative absence of theory development regarding suicidal behavior. The current article presents the interpersonal theory of suicidal behavior. We propose that the most dangerous form of suicidal desire is caused by the simultaneous presence of two interpersonal constructs-thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness (and hopelessness about these states)-and further that the capability to engage in suicidal behavior is separate from the desire to engage in suicidal behavior. According to the theory, the capability for suicidal behavior emerges, via habituation and opponent processes, in response to repeated exposure to physically painful and/or fear-inducing experiences. In the current article, the theory's hypotheses are more precisely delineated than in previous presentations (Joiner, 2005), with the aim of inviting scientific inquiry and potential falsification of the theory's hypotheses.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide, arguing that lethal suicidal desire requires the co-occurrence of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness with hopelessness, while the capacity to act is acquired separately through habituation to pain and fear. It reviews risk-factor literature and prior tests to specify four falsifiable hypotheses linking these constructs to passive ideation, active desire, intent, and lethal or near-lethal attempts.

Key findings

  • The theory separates suicidal desire from suicidal capability: desire is attributed to simultaneous thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and hopelessness about those states; capability is acquired through repeated exposure to physically painful or fear-inducing experiences, lowering fear of death and raising pain tolerance.
  • Four hypotheses are proposed: either thwarted belongingness or perceived burdensomeness alone can produce passive ideation; both plus hopelessness can produce active suicidal desire; desire plus reduced fear of death can produce suicidal intent; and intent plus elevated pain tolerance can produce serious attempts.
  • Cited empirical support includes a moderate correlation between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness (about .58), findings that high levels of both predict more severe ideation, an interaction between perceived burdensomeness and acquired capability predicting clinician-rated risk, and a three-way interaction predicting whether a suicidal crisis involved an attempt.
  • Epidemiological figures cited include roughly one million suicide deaths worldwide in 2000 with 10 to 20 times as many attempts, about 95% of people who die by suicide having a mental disorder, a U.S. male-to-female death ratio of 4 to 1 versus a female-to-male non-lethal attempt ratio of 3 to 1, non-lethal attempts outnumbering lethal ones 25 to 1, and annual U.S. rates of 3.3% serious ideation, 1.0% planning, 0.6% attempts, and .01% deaths.

Methods

  • This is a theoretical and integrative review rather than a new empirical study; it reviews risk factors for lethal suicidal behavior and existing theories, then maps those factors onto the proposed constructs.
  • The authors specify four hypotheses and conditions under which each could be falsified, drawing on prior studies from their group and others, including clinical, undergraduate, community, military, psychological autopsy, and suicide-note samples.
  • The main analysis is conceptual synthesis and hypothesis specification; no new statistical analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that its constructs are treated as sufficient but not necessary for suicidal behavior, leaving open other pathways, and that whether the same mechanisms underlie all suicidal behaviors remains an empirical question.
  • The paper notes that some tests are partial—for example, one study measured perceived burdensomeness and acquired capability but not belongingness—and that retrospective designs may introduce recall bias; direct tests with lethal outcomes are proposed but not yet conducted.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review rather than a systematic meta-analysis, many cited findings come from separate studies that do not test the full model, and the constructs and their measures are still being validated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018697

Cites

312 of 312 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

7 of 150 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 139 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 93
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 50
127 of 127
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A core set of processes and conditions underlies near-lethal and lethal suicide attempts, and these processes operate to varying degrees in other suicide-related behaviors.

    “our theory assumes that a core set of processes and conditions underlie near-lethal and lethal suicide attempts and that these processes are operative, to varying degrees, in other suicide-related behaviors”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Suicidal behavior has received relatively little empirical attention.

    “Suicidal behavior is a major problem worldwide and at the same time has received relatively little empirical attention.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    People die by suicide because they are capable of suicide and because they desire it.

    “The foundation of the Interpersonal Theory, as discussed above, is the assumption that people die by suicide because they can and because they want to (Figure 1).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Thwarted belongingness is a dynamic cognitive-affective state rather than a stable trait, shaped by interpersonal and intrapersonal factors, and it varies over time.

    “The Interpersonal Theory includes the assumption that thwarted belongingness is a dynamic cognitive-affective state, rather than a stable trait, that is influenced by both interpersonal and intrapersonal factors.”
    “Thus, the theory presumes that an individual’s degree of belongingness is likely to vary over time.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The need to belong is dimensional rather than categorical.

    “The theory also includes the assumption that the need to belong is a dimensional, rather than categorical phenomenon.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Perceived burdensomeness is a dynamic cognitive-affective state and a dimensional phenomenon that varies over time, relationships, and severity.

    “As with thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness is presumed to be a dynamic cognitive affect state, as well as a dimensional phenomenon.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are distinct but related constructs.

    “Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are presumed to be distinct, but related constructs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Method substitution does not typically occur when access to a means for suicide is blocked.

    “data indicating that method substitution does not typically occur”
    “method substitution—when access to a means for suicide is blocked—does not occur”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Impulsive people do not necessarily make impulsive suicide attempts; people who have engaged in more impulsive behaviors have been shown to engage in more prior planning for suicide attempts and use more medically serious methods.

    “impulsive people do not necessarily make impulsive suicide attempts; in fact, people who have engaged in more impulsive behaviors have been shown to engage in more prior planning for suicide attempts and use more medically serious methods.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There are relatively large numbers of people who desire suicide and moderate numbers who have developed the capacity for suicidal behavior, but the presence of both is comparatively rare.

    “the theory involves the assumption that there are relatively large numbers of people who desire suicide and moderate numbers of those who have developed the capacity for suicidal behavior, but the presence of both should be comparatively rare.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    To a large extent, the same mental processes or mechanisms underlie all forms of suicidal behavior.

    “The theory involves the assumption that, to a large extent, the same mental processes underlie all forms of suicidal behavior.”
    “Further, the assumption that the same mechanisms underlie all suicidal behaviors—if it were supported—would greatly enhance the clinical utility of the theory.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Each of the theory's three conditions is relatively rare, and their confluence is rarer.

    “As each of these conditions is relatively rare, and their confluence more so, the theory is consistent with the rarity of suicidal behavior itself.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Male suicides outnumber female suicides worldwide, while far more females than males engage in ultimately non-lethal suicidal behavior.

    “Male suicides outnumber female suicides worldwide, yet far more females than males are engaging in ultimately non-lethal suicidal behavior.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Individuals with mental disorders are at elevated risk for suicide, but the vast majority of them will not demonstrate suicidal behaviors.

    “individuals who suffer from mental disorders are at elevated risk for suicide (with some disorders conferring greater risk than others), but the vast majority of these individuals will not demonstrate suicidal behaviors.”
14 of 14

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The liability indicator list has five entries, not six

    Minor

    The sentence announces six observable risk factors but lists only five: unemployment distress, incarceration distress, homelessness, serious physical illness, and statements of perceived expendability or burden.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 315 references

3 of the 315 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5,292

Metadata

Authors
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2010
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
575-600
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2143095451
Cited by
5,292
References
315
Citations by year
2026: 508 · 2025: 547 · 2024: 512 · 2023: 467 · 2022: 444 · 2021: 486 · 2020: 460 · 2019: 318 · 2018: 359 · 2017: 281 · 2016: 266 · 2015: 215 · 2014: 157 · 2013: 118 · 2012: 79
FWCI
87.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 F31 MH077386-01, 1 F31MH081396, 5T32MH020061-09)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidal behavior, interpersonal theory of suicide, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, hopelessness, suicidal desire, habituation, opponent processes, pain, fear, theory development
MeSH terms
Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychological Theory, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review