Cited by 45Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation

Lorencatto, Fabiana, West, Robert, Seymour, Natalie, Michie, Susan·2013·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a difference between interventions as planned and as delivered in practice. Unless we know what was actually delivered, we cannot understand "what worked" in effective interventions. This study aimed to (a) assess whether an established taxonomy of 53 smoking cessation behavior change techniques (BCTs) may be applied or adapted as a method for reliably specifying the content of smoking cessation behavioral support consultations and (b) develop an effective method for training researchers and practitioners in the reliable application of the taxonomy. METHOD: Fifteen transcripts of audio-recorded consultations delivered by England's Stop Smoking Services were coded into component BCTs using the taxonomy. Interrater reliability and potential adaptations to the taxonomy to improve coding were discussed following 3 coding waves. A coding training manual was developed through expert consensus and piloted on 10 trainees, assessing coding reliability and self-perceived competence before and after training. RESULTS: An average of 33 BCTs from the taxonomy were identified at least once across sessions and coding waves. Consultations contained on average 12 BCTs (range = 8-31). Average interrater reliability was high (88% agreement). The taxonomy was adapted to simplify coding by merging co-occurring BCTs and refining BCT definitions. Coding reliability and self-perceived competence significantly improved posttraining for all trainees. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to apply a taxonomy to reliably identify and classify BCTs in smoking cessation behavioral support delivered in practice, and train inexperienced coders to do so reliably. This method can be used to investigate variability in provision of behavioral support across services, monitor fidelity of delivery, and identify training needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032106

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Borrelli, B. (2011). The assessment, monitoring and enhancement of fidelity in public health clinical trials. Pub Health Dentistry, vol. 71, p.52-63.
  2. Hardeman, W., Lamming, L., Kellar, I., et al. (2011). Fidelity of a nurse-led intervention to support medication taking in type 2 diabetes (SAMS trial). Psychology and Health, vol. 26 (2).
  3. Lorencatto, F., West, R., & Michie, S. (2012). Identifying evidence-based behaviour change techniques for smoking cessation in pregnancy. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol. 14 (9), pp. 1019-1026.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Seymour, N., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
528-544
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2047356023
Cited by
45
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health (DOH T336/BSS/M)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
smoking cessation, behaviour change techniques, smoking cessation services, inter-rater reliability, coding reliability, perceived competence
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, England, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Smoking Cessation, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review