Cited by 217Team Dynamics and PerformanceGender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 257 of the 259 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; 2 of the 125 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.

Open access
Homan, Astrid C., Gündemir, Seval, Buengeler, Claudia, van Kleef, Gerben A.·2020·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The importance of leaders as diversity managers is widely acknowledged. However, a dynamic and comprehensive theory on the interplay between team diversity and team leadership is missing. We provide a review of the extant (scattered) research on the interplay between team diversity and team leadership, which reveals critical shortcomings in the current scholarly understanding. This calls for an integrative theoretical account of functional diversity leadership in teams. Here we outline such an integrative theory. We propose that functional diversity leadership requires (a) knowledge of the favorable and unfavorable processes that can be instigated by diversity, (b) mastery of task- and person-focused leadership behaviors necessary to address associated team needs, and (c) competencies to predict and/or diagnose team needs and to apply corresponding leadership behaviors to address those needs. We integrate findings of existing studies on the interplay between leadership and team diversity with insights from separate literatures on team diversity and (team) leadership. The resulting Leading Diversity model (LeaD) posits that effective leadership of diverse teams requires proactive as well as reactive attention to teams' needs in terms of informational versus intergroup processes and adequate management of these processes through task- versus person-focused leadership. LeaD offers new insights into specific competencies and actions that allow leaders to shape the influence of team diversity on team outcomes and, thereby, harvest the potential value in diversity. Organizations can capitalize on this model to promote optimal processes and performance in diverse teams. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Verified 2026-10-11 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000482

Cites

257 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

2 of 125 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 104 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 41
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
75 of 75
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A team has a clear hierarchical structure, in which the leader is held responsible and accountable for its functioning.

    “In line with Zaccaro and colleagues (2001), we presume that a team has a clear hierarchical structure, in which the leader is held responsible and accountable for its functioning.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The leader is motivated to understand the team's needs and manage team diversity.

    “We assume that the leader is motivated to understand the team's needs and manage team diversity (see also Nishii, Khattab, Shemla, & Paluch, 2018).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Diversity is not limited to organizations but is also present in schools, neighborhoods, sport teams, and society as a whole.

    “Diversity is not limited to organizations, but is also present in schools, neighborhoods, sport teams, and society as a whole.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Hassan study is described as both finding and not finding moderation

    Minor

    The review table says Hassan and colleagues found a significant interaction between transformational leadership and cognitive diversity. The subsequent summary lists the same study as evidence that transformational leadership had no impact on diversity's effects.

  • Intergroup bias is assigned two different matching strategies

    Minor

    The model consistently labels person-focused leadership for intergroup bias a complementary match, but its later interpretation of the Homan and Greer study calls that same pairing a supplementary match.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 224 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. [93]93. ‫ء‬ Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., & Côté, S. (2015, August). Regulating emotional events in diverse teams: The role of leader emotion management. Paper presented at the 75th conference of the Academy of Management (AoM), Vancouver, Canada.
  3. [105]105. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  4. [211]211. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  5. [218]218. Thompson, P. A. (1996). What's fueling the flames in cyberspace: A social influence model. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. B. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 297-315). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  6. [239]239. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Homan, Astrid C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2020-10
Volume
105
Issue
10
Pages
1101-1128
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W3001510674
Cited by
217
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
team diversity, functional leadership, intergroup processes, leader competencies, diversity management
MeSH terms
Employment, Group Processes, Humans, Leadership, Psychological Theory, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review