Cited by 103Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural dynamics and brain functionBiofield Effects and Biophysics

The brain is both neurocomputer and quantum computer

Hameroff, Stuart R.·2007·Cognitive Science

Abstract

In their article, Is the Brain a Quantum Computer,? Litt, Eliasmith, Kroon, Weinstein, and Thagard (2006) criticize the Penrose-Hameroff "Orch OR" quantum computational model of consciousness, arguing instead for neurocomputation as an explanation for mental phenomena. Here I clarify and defend Orch OR, show how Orch OR and neurocomputation are compatible, and question whether neurocomputation alone can physiologically account for coherent gamma synchrony EEG, a candidate for the neural correlate of consciousness. Orch OR is based on quantum computation in microtubules within dendrites in cortex and other regions linked by dendritic-dendritic gap junctions ("dendritic webs") acting as laterally connected input layers of the brain's neurocomputational architecture. Within dendritic webs, consciousness is proposed to occur as gamma EEG-synchronized sequences of discrete quantum computational events acting in integration phases of neurocomputational "integrate-and-fire" cycles. Orch OR is a viable approach toward understanding how the brain produces consciousness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03640210701704004

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MT-based information processing offers a huge potential increase in brain capacity.

    “MT-based information processing offers a huge potential increase in brain capacity [74].”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [74]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hameroff, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Hameroff, Stuart R.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1035-1045
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2135027517
Cited by
103
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
Keywords
Orchestrated Objective Reduction, Penrose-Hameroff, neural computation, consciousness, microtubules, gamma synchrony, EEG, neural correlates of consciousness, gap junctions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review