CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells

Stingele, Silvia, Stoehr, Gabriele, Peplowska, Karolina, Cox, Jürgen, Mann, Matthias, Storchova, Zuzana·2012·Molecular Systems Biology
DOI 10.1038/msb.2012.40PMC PMC3472693
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/msb.2012.40

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SQSTM1 overexpression at both gene and protein levels can be observed in muscle atrophy induced by cancer, though not by glucocorticoids, suggesting that the stimulus inducing autophagy may also be relevant to differential regulation of autophagy-related proteins.

    “Of interest, SQSTM1 overexpression at both the gene and protein levels can be observed in muscle atrophy induced by cancer, though not by glucocorticoids, suggesting that the stimulus inducing autophagy may also be relevant to the differential regulation of autophagy-related proteins [584].”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [584]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger DL, Veitia RA (2005) Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet 21: 219–226 · DOI
  2. Chen G, Bradford WD, Seidel CW, Li R (2012) Hsp90 stress potentiates rapid cellular adaptation through induction of aneuploidy. Nature 482: 246–250 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fournier RE (1981) A general high‐efficiency procedure for production of microcell hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 6349–6353 · DOI
  4. Goldberg AL, Dice JF (1974) Intracellular protein degradation in mammalian and bacterial cells. Annu Rev Biochem 43: 835–869 · DOI
  5. Guialis A, Morrison KE, Ingles CJ (1979) Regulated synthesis of RNA polymerase II polypeptides in Chinese hamster ovary cell lines. J Biol Chem 254: 4171–4176 · DOI
  6. Guo M, Birchler JA (1994) Trans‐acting dosage effects on the expression of model gene systems in maize aneuploids. Science 266: 1999–2002 · DOI
  7. Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P (2007) The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum Mol Genet 16: R203–R208 · DOI
  8. Haugen AC, Goel A, Yamada K, Marra G, Nguyen TP, Nagasaka T, Kanazawa S, Koike J, Kikuchi Y, Zhong X, Arita M, Shibuya K, Oshimura M, Hemmi H, Boland CR, Koi M (2008) Genetic instability caused by loss of MutS homologue 3 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 68: 8465–8472 · DOI
  9. Huettel B, Kreil DP, Matzke M, Matzke AJ (2008) Effects of aneuploidy on genome structure, expression, and interphase organization in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 4: e1000226 · DOI
  10. Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP (2008) Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet 4: e1000223 · DOI
  11. Lamark T, Johansen T (2009) Autophagy: links with the proteasome. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 192–198 · DOI
  12. Makarevitch I, Phillips RL, Springer NM (2008) Profiling expression changes caused by a segmental aneuploid in maize. BMC Genomics 9: 7–16 · DOI
  13. Masramon L, Ribas M, Cifuentes P, Arribas R, García F, Egozcue J, Peinado MA, Miró R (2000) Cytogenetic characterization of two colon cell lines by using conventional G‐banding, comparative genomic hybridization, and whole chromosome painting. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 121: 17–21 · DOI
  14. Niwa O, Tange Y, Kurabayashi A (2006) Growth arrest and chromosome instability in aneuploid yeast. Yeast 23: 937–950 · DOI
  15. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1: 376–386 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R (2010) Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468: 321–325 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ruepp A, Waegele B, Lechner M, Brauner B, Dunger‐Kaltenbach I, Fobo G, Frishman G, Montrone C, Mewes HW (2010) CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes‐‐2009. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D497–D501 · DOI
  18. Segal DJ, McCoy EE (1974) Studies on Down's syndrome in tissue culture. I. Growth rates and protein contents of fibroblast cultures. J Cell Physiol 83: 85–90 · DOI
  19. Selmecki A, Forche A, Berman J (2006) Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug‐resistant Candida albicans. Science 313: 367–370 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sheltzer JM, Blank HM, Pfau SJ, Tange Y, George BM, Humpton TJ, Brito IL, Hiraoka Y, Niwa O, Amon A (2011) Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science 333: 1026–1030 · DOI
  21. Stenberg P, Lundberg LE, Johansson A‐M, Rydén P, Svensson MJ, Larsson J (2009) Buffering of Segmental and Chromosomal Aneuploidies in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 5: e1000465 · DOI
  22. Storchova Z, Pellman D (2004) From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 45–54 · DOI
  23. Tang YC, Williams BR, Siegel JJ, Amon A (2011) Identification of aneuploidy‐selective antiproliferation compounds. Cell 144: 499–512 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Torres EM, Dephoure N, Panneerselvam A, Tucker CM, Whittaker CA, Gygi SP, Dunham MJ, Amon A (2010) Identification of aneuploidy‐tolerating mutations. Cell 143: 71–83 · DOI
  25. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, Amon A (2007) Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317: 916–924 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Upender MB, Habermann JK, McShane LM, Korn EL, Barrett JC, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T (2004) Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells. Cancer Res 64: 6941–6949 · DOI
  27. Williams BR, Prabhu VR, Hunter KE, Glazier CM, Whittaker CA, Housman DE, Amon A (2008) Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 322: 703–709 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stingele, S., Stoehr, G., Peplowska, K., Cox, J., Mann, M., & Storchova, Z.
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-09-11
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
1744-4292
DOI
10.1038/msb.2012.40
PMC
PMC3472693
Cited by
468
References
8
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review