Cited by 324Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Control of visual cortical signals by prefrontal dopamine

Open access
Noudoost, Behrad, Moore, Tirin·2011·Nature

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex is thought to modulate sensory signals in posterior cortices during top-down attention, but little is known about the underlying neural circuitry. Experimental and clinical evidence indicate that prefrontal dopamine has an important role in cognitive functions, acting predominantly through D1 receptors. Here we show that dopamine D1 receptors mediate prefrontal control of signals in the visual cortex of macaques (Macaca mulatta). We pharmacologically altered D1-receptor-mediated activity in the frontal eye field of the prefrontal cortex and measured the effect on the responses of neurons in area V4 of the visual cortex. This manipulation was sufficient to enhance the magnitude, the orientation selectivity and the reliability of V4 visual responses to an extent comparable with the known effects of top-down attention. The enhancement of V4 signals was restricted to neurons with response fields overlapping the part of visual space affected by the D1 receptor manipulation. Altering either D1- or D2-receptor-mediated frontal eye field activity increased saccadic target selection but the D2 receptor manipulation did not enhance V4 signals. Our results identify a role for D1 receptors in mediating the control of visual cortical signals by the prefrontal cortex and suggest how processing in sensory areas could be altered in mental disorders involving prefrontal dopamine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09995

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D1 receptors in the FEF mediated prefrontal control by leading to enhanced and more selective neuronal responses in V4, comparable with known top-down attentional modulations.

    “D1 receptors in the FEF mediated prefrontal control by leading to enhanced and more selective neuronal responses in V4 in a manner that was comparable with known top-down attentional modulations.”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Noudoost and Moore (2011)

  • Dopamine may preferentially contribute to endogenous attention.

    “whereas dopamine may preferentially contribute to endogenous attention [47].”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [47]

  • With nonhuman primates we can interrogate how catecholaminergic circuits in the prefrontal cortex contribute to ADHD-linked behaviors.

    “With nonhuman primates we can, for example, interrogate how catecholaminergic circuits in the prefrontal cortex contribute to ADHD-linked behaviors (e.g. [19,47])”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [47]

  • D1 dopaminergic receptor activation in frontal eye fields enhances amplitude and selectivity of neural responses in cortical area V4.

    “Moreover, D1 dopaminergic receptor activation in the frontal eye fields enhances the amplitude and selectivity of neural responses in cortical area V4 (REF.206).”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [206]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noudoost, B., & Moore, T.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Noudoost, Behrad
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-05-15
Volume
474
Issue
7351
Pages
372-375
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2008506107
Cited by
324
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Eye Institute (EY014924, R01EY014924, R56EY014924)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
prefrontal dopamine, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, frontal eye field, top-down attention, orientation selectivity, macaque
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzazepines, Dopamine, Macaca mulatta, Muscimol, Neurons, Saccades, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, GABA-A Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review