Cited by 539Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Gain control by layer six in cortical circuits of vision

Open access
Olsen, Shawn R., Bortone, Dante S., Adesnik, Hillel, Scanziani, Massimo·2012·Nature

Abstract

After entering the cerebral cortex, sensory information spreads through six different horizontal neuronal layers that are interconnected by vertical axonal projections. It is believed that through these projections layers can influence each other's response to sensory stimuli, but the specific role that each layer has in cortical processing is still poorly understood. Here we show that layer six in the primary visual cortex of the mouse has a crucial role in controlling the gain of visually evoked activity in neurons of the upper layers without changing their tuning to orientation. This gain modulation results from the coordinated action of layer six intracortical projections to superficial layers and deep projections to the thalamus, with a substantial role of the intracortical circuit. This study establishes layer six as a major mediator of cortical gain modulation and suggests that it could be a node through which convergent inputs from several brain areas can regulate the earliest steps of cortical visual processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10835

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optogenetic driving of L6 principal cells in V1 inhibited their extrinsic targets in LGN and intrinsic targets in cortical layers 2 to 5.

    “the authors showed that deep L6 principal cells inhibited their extrinsic targets in the LGN and their intrinsic targets in cortical layers 2 to 5 (Olsen et al., 2012).”

    From Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding (2012) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2012

  • In Olsen et al., LGN visual responses were suppressed by 76%, and V1 suppression was around 80-84%.

    “This suppression was powerful – in the LGN, visual responses were suppressed by 76%. Suppression was also high in V1, around 80-84% (Olsen et al., 2012).”

    From Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding (2012) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2012

  • The findings also suggest a local circuit mechanism in visual cortex where deep layers functionally inhibit activity of superficial layers.

    “It also suggests a local circuit mechanism in visual cortex where deep layers functionally inhibit activity of superficial layers (70).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Jones EG Thalamus University of Cambridge Cambridge 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsen, S. R., Bortone, D. S., Adesnik, H., & Scanziani, M.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Olsen, Shawn R.
  • Scanziani, Massimo
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
483
Issue
7387
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2045933100
Cited by
539
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 18
FWCI
21.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS007220, R01 NS069010, RC1NS069010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
primary visual cortex, thalamocortical connections, orientation selectivity, cortical circuits, sensory processing, mouse visual cortex, optogenetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Models, Neurological, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Synapses, Thalamic Nuclei, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review