Cited by 7,950Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity

Open access

Abstract

The systematic translation of cancer genomic data into knowledge of tumour biology and therapeutic possibilities remains challenging. Such efforts should be greatly aided by robust preclinical model systems that reflect the genomic diversity of human cancers and for which detailed genetic and pharmacological annotation is available. Here we describe the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): a compilation of gene expression, chromosomal copy number and massively parallel sequencing data from 947 human cancer cell lines. When coupled with pharmacological profiles for 24 anticancer drugs across 479 of the cell lines, this collection allowed identification of genetic, lineage, and gene-expression-based predictors of drug sensitivity. In addition to known predictors, we found that plasma cell lineage correlated with sensitivity to IGF1 receptor inhibitors; AHR expression was associated with MEK inhibitor efficacy in NRAS-mutant lines; and SLFN11 expression predicted sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors. Together, our results indicate that large, annotated cell-line collections may help to enable preclinical stratification schemata for anticancer agents. The generation of genetic predictions of drug response in the preclinical setting and their incorporation into cancer clinical trial design could speed the emergence of 'personalized' therapeutic regimens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,107

Metadata

Authors
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., Reddy, A., Liu, M., Murray, L., Berger, M. F., Monahan, J. E., Morais, P., Meltzer, J., Korejwa, A., Jané-Valbuena, J., Mapa, F. A., Thibault, J., Bric-Furlong, E., Raman, P., Shipway, A., Engels, I. H., Cheng, J., Yu, G. K., Yu, J., Aspesi, P., de Silva, M., Jagtap, K., Jones, M. D., Wang, L., Hatton, C., Palescandolo, E., Gupta, S., Mahan, S., Sougnez, C., Onofrio, R. C., Liefeld, T., MacConaill, L., Winckler, W., Reich, M., Li, N., Mesirov, J. P., Gabriel, S. B., Getz, G., Ardlie, K., Chan, V., Myer, V. E., Weber, B. L., Porter, J., Warmuth, M., Finan, P., Harris, J. L., Meyerson, M., Golub, T. R., Morrissey, M. P., Sellers, W. R., Schlegel, R., & Garraway, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schlegel, Robert
  • Garraway, Levi A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
483
Issue
7391
Pages
603-607
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2043398720
Cited by
7,950
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 361 · 2025: 501 · 2024: 617 · 2023: 719 · 2022: 723 · 2021: 839 · 2020: 682 · 2019: 687 · 2018: 628 · 2017: 500 · 2016: 516 · 2015: 436 · 2014: 348 · 2013: 283 · 2012: 103
FWCI
124.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP2OD002750)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG003067)
  • National Cancer Institute (R33CA155554, R33CA126674)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM074024)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, anticancer drug sensitivity, drug resistance, cancer cell lines, Ewing sarcoma, PARP inhibitors, SLFN11, topoisomerase inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, NRAS mutation, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, gene expression profiles, chromosomal copy number, predictive modeling, precision oncology
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Chromosomes, Human, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Encyclopedias as Topic, Humans, Models, Biological, Neoplasms, Pharmacogenetics, Plasma Cells, Genes, ras, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Databases, Factual, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Cell Lineage, Gene Expression Profiling, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Genomics, Cell Line, Tumor, Precision Medicine, Topoisomerase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review